开云体育

Attachments are JPGs. Post is e-mail sent from Thunderbird (e-mail program), which shows sent e-mail as having 2 attachments, 433kB; and sent e-mail size as 597kB. On receipt (from Groups.io)

You might tweak your preferences about size. Or perhaps there is a problem with your attachments? What kind of attachments? Are you using the paperclip icon or the Add Pictures icon? Frances -- Help

Items that count towards the storage limit These items are counted towards your group’s storage limit: Files Photos Images in databases Images on wiki pages Message attachments Note: The contents of

A follow up query, if anybody is able to elucidate: Is the test for 'Max Attachment Size' done on the (total) attachments (only) size, (as one would expect), or on the total mesage size (including

/ / /On 2023-06-14 15:10, Peter S. Shenkin via groups.io wrote:// / Personally, if it was my group, I'd have it Announcement-Only as you have, with access to the Directory and Member List disabled,

Since it is an announcement only group, probably no downside. You could add a footer that is added automatically to each message - In Admin, Settings, Message Formatting. Perhaps you could put "Find

Hi, I have no plan to add a discussion group to this group. In view of that, do you still think it's a mistake to leave it open for viewing and for membership? For example, if I meet someone at a gig

/On 2023-06-14 10:31, Peter S. Shenkin via groups.io wrote:// / You should be very careful having your group wide-open like that and also public, especially if you create a discussion subgroup, as

Thanks, Donald. I am already a member. I did report a concern a few weeks ago which, in fact, Mark took care of. -P. wrote:

Thank you Duane, as always. The issue for me isn't privacy but a more user-friendly atmosphere. So I don't mind people I don't know joining and looking in. I'll consider your invitation suggestion,

Peter, Join the beta group here at the link Duane provided earlier: https://beta.groups.io/g/main and state your suggestion with this at the end of the subject line: #Suggestion like: Subject: Change

Final thoughts here.? Why not just invite them instead of Direct Add?? You'd still have some boilerplate in the invitation, but you can insert additional information from an Invite notice or

We seem to be going round in circles and repeating your point of view here is not going to get you anywhere.? I suggest you read Duane's post ( #44070 (

The problem is the Direct Add message, not the Welcome Message. Altering the Welcome message might indeed help to solve the problem. However, the two messages appear to be sent out at the same time if

What is wrong with including your preferred message in the WELCOME message when one subscribes to join? I never had anyone turned off by welcome messages containing nuanced warnings. David Samuelsen,

The group owner, obviously, is what I was referring to. C'est moi, in this case. -P.

Tue, 13 Jun 2023 17:43:52 -0400, "Peter S. Shenkin" <shenkin@...>, wrote: Have you received a legal written opinion about that? Mark Fletcher *is* the owner. Arno

Peter, I've never had anyone tell me that the boilerplate text turned them away from the group, so I can't say it would help me. It wouldn't hurt my groups, so my only concern would be if it can't be

I agree that it might not pass the "who cares" test. So far, I'm the only one who cares! -P.

I don't see it changing. It has to meet the standards of the EU as well as other jurisdictions. They may actually require the legal stuff first. If that's the case, it won't be changed. To suggest