开云体育

When the first message is sent, the person receiving will have the email address of the sender.? If the receiver responds, it will go to the original sender, so then they'd both have each others

Hi Duane, Bruce, Thanks for letting me know, I checked the owner's guide but didn't think to check the members guide - dooh! Best wishes, Peter

Peter -- It's a spam mitigation feature, and thus unlikely to ever be configurable. If someone wants to DM you more than twice a day you'll have to share your email address with them. Of course,

It can't be changed.? It's covered in the Members Manual ( /helpcenter/membersmanual/1/viewing-the-directory ). Duane -- Lots of detailed information can be found in the Owners

Hi, One of our members received the message below when they tried to send a third DM to me in a single day. I've looked in the forum Admin panel but can't find a setting that appears to change this.

In Admin, Settings. Spam Control. That's what it would revert to automatically. If you have chosen All Messages are Moderated. See

I realize the member becomes "Unmoderated", but most of my groups are fully moderated, so I wanted to know if they go to " Override not moderated."? In an emergency, I unmoderate my group, so " Use

After the requisite number of messages, the new member is automatically unmoderated. See this in the Owner Help Manual section about setting up Spam Control and Moderation settings.

When a member has posted the required number of messages to become unmoderated, what is their member status? Use Group Moderation Setting or Override: not moderated Thanks for any help! -- Jim

Ah, thanks.? Missed that in settings.

THAT we do have.? See /helpcenter/membersmanual/1/understanding-groups-io-accounts/setting-account-preferences-and-viewing-account-information about half way down the page.? Be sure

Thank you to everyone that responded! ?I'm by no means newbie at this, but in my old age have gotten somewhat paranoid and legal shy. Not only have I been taking care of the "list" but I am on my

Stephanie -- New graphics-sharing groups are not being approved. Existing groups were grandfathered. Yes, there has been a history of copyright infringement by bad actors, resulting in DMCA takedown

Well said, Jack, and I agree 100% on both points. Our guidelines state that folks should take back-and-forth arguments off-list, and I’ve intervened a number of times to enforce that. Pete

My experience is that most group members prefer a stricter moderator. Also, it is worth while to keep in mind that people rarely care who is in the right in an on-line arguement. They just want it to

I didn't realize until you posted as a bug on beta, but if it were me, I'd just remove the " as it is 100 days since it was created" part, so it would apply to all locked topics. Duane -- Lots of

This individual is likely breaking state law as well as federal law in doing so. Perhaps your local police can help get a restraining order and perhaps file charges. He has no First Amendment rights

There are very few reasons to ban someone immediately and without a second chance, but for me this would be one of them. Pete

*In my opinion* (only), any member who cannot be relied upon to refrain from malicious actions such as you describe should be summarily banned. DaveD

No, at present, a moderated member only pertains to messages they send.? There has been discussion and requests to have individual permissions/restrictions per member for files, photos, etc.? It was