开云体育

Unless you change it, which, weirdly, you can do.

No.? The person that creates the album will always be shown as the owner.? BTW, if a member creates an album, they can set it to Personal so only they (and group owner/mods) can add photos. Duane --

Unfortunately not true.?? Some MUAs (e.g. Thunderbird) make "reply to list" the default reply action to messages, even if the list is configured "Announce Only", "Reply To=Sender", and "Remove other

I've recently set up the Annaba Veterans private members' group with a view to collecting members' photos in various albums.? As all the members have complete access to the Photos section, I'd like

This is correct as you and Peter point out. In the US, there is no free speech requirement on private citizens or groups thereof. And your last question is key. The groups I run are

Btw, even government forums have the right to police content.

You are correct. The first amendment - which I'm assuming is what we're referring to here - relates specifically to Congressional authority and nothing more. Like any other publisher (think Twitter,

If it was reported to GIO and nothing was done, then management (Mark) doesn't find that it violates any terms.? At that point, just ignore it and move on.? I don't believe this was the case

It seems to me that free speech rights don't come into play here. This isn't a government-sponsored forum. The owners of groups and Groups.IO can set limits on content. The real issue is whether the

What follows is a personal opinion with which others may or may not agree. If your fellow owner actually wrote what you quoted above then I'm afraid I see that as problematic. Politics is a very

Do you have your group guidelines posted on your site? See /g/GroupManagersForum/wiki/Member-Notices And there are other sample guideline documents in the wiki. Also you can suggest

Hi peeps, We co-moderate/co-own a ~ 3k member group -- One member recently complained to groups.io about a post a moderator wrote, saying it wasn't on topic, violated the rules, etc. Long story.

Larry, SORBS is one that I recognize. Which means it is old-school, and was likely a thorn in the side of Yahoo Groups delivery at some point in the past. I don't run an email service so I don't

Robin, A rather heavy-handed approach to this would be to keep all sensitive information in a sub-group. Then you control access to the sensitive information by who you add to the subgroup. That's the

There is no such setting. Regards, Bruce Check out the new groups.io Help Center ( /helpcenter ) and groups.io Owners Manual (

Is there a setting that can be turned off to NOT unsubscribe a member when they hit SPAM on a groups.io message? I have plenty of folks doing it by mistake not understanding why they are no longer

I could not find any mention of this "sole remaining owner" exception in the new Owners Manual or GMF Wiki. I might suggest this be added in Docs group and here in the Wiki. Thank you.

I have prevented it in the visibility section for non-members, but wish there was a ‘limited’ subscription or something. Thank you for taking the time to answer me. Robin

You can't. Members have access to the archives and that's it. (I assume that you mean message archives...) There is no he can but he can't see "x". Even non - members have access to the message

Hello all, I'm trying to figure out where exactly I would find the control over which members have access to the archives. I would like to be able to limit a member's access since they will not be on