开云体育

Paul M, Nope. But I think there have been suggestions along those lines. I think the suggestion was more along the line of causing those messages to be automatically held for moderation (in an

And one persons 'profanity' is anothers name__? refer https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=Dikshit. The answer is no. And 'moderation is the answer. Intervention and education is a form of

Minh Tran wrote: In beta #21312, Bruce Bowman replied: https://beta.groups.io/g/main/message/21312 Bruce, I may be missing something obvious, but can you explain your inference? I dragged this back to

Hi all, This week's change log: https://beta.groups.io/g/main/message/21314 Feel free to reply to this topic if you'd like to comment on the changes. Or better yet, if you expect a lot of discussion

Apparently it depends to some extent on how busy the servers are, how big the file is, type of file, etc.? I've uploaded a couple of files (pdf) near 500MB (for testing storage limits on a free

Rob, It looks like the limit is 20 MB. https://beta.groups.io/g/main/message/436 That's a pretty old message. You might post a suggestion in beta that the current limit be displayed on the upload page

Even profanity can't be completely stopped by blacklists and the like, in part because different people legitimately have a different sense of what profane is. I was once in the baggage claim of BMI

With all due respect, it actually doesn’t answer the question. If there is a file size restriction, what is the maximum file size that can be uploaded? I’m paying for storage, it’s not much good

That is certainly true, but while not commenting on whether a Profanity Stopper might or might not be useful or practicable, and accepting that responsibility for what children can see is in the first

Jim Pruitt forwarded a copy of Mark's thoughts on the matter, and you quoted it, as in you quoted the answer to your own question. :) Chris

And is there a file size restriction? I know every time I try to load a large file it just hangs. [excess quote trimmed by moderator]

Just a point - the originator of the thread thought that it could optional and turned on by the group owner if necessary. I do agree that there are problems with such a list - could be too strict. But

This made sense back in the days of acoustic modems. It makes no sense now. Best, Glenn

Not entirely.? Not everyone can afford a new computer every few years just so they can run the software that demands an upgrade.? I use plain text, an old computer, and simple software.? It does

Does that mean it is possible to upload HTML files? Jim Fisher -- http://jimellame.tumblr.com - My thoughts on freedom (needs updating) http://jimella.wordpress.com - political snippets, especially

I agree 100% with you on everything you said in this message Brian. If I were setting up such a file of "bad" words it would be completely empty. I don't believe there are such things as bad words,

I wouldn't argue with any of that, but senders should be aware that formatting which relies on HTML will not be seen by all their readers. Presumably it's there because they want their readers to be

And I have grown bone tired of being told about "the problems" of those who cling to antiquated software and methods of all sorts.? Those problems are entirely of their own making. The phrase, "Do

Yes, exactly. If, for example, someone decides to read their email using PINE because that's what they baby ducked on, that doesn't mean that the rest of us should be denied in-line attachments just

Mark said that he did not know of a filetype restriction but thought it was file size.? The largest file showed 10.052mb according to Windows Explorer but Groups.io had it as 9.52mb for the 7z