开云体育

Toby, keep you and Alan and the same reply. I have not heard, of Mark hiring any help. He had a friend, that was going to watch out for things while he in travel mode. India will small issues.

So, it turns out that Google and some others allow weird dotting in email addresses so that's how I got onto the new groups without a dot in my name. I logged in with the dotless name per Shal's

Shal, I appreciate your calm and reasonable comments, recognize that you aren't responsible for the policy, and are trying to be fair. But I must respectfully disagree with much of what you said.

dd, Look at the Membership menu and see if you can switch to your owner membership: The screenshot shows me having three memberships, each using a distinct email address, and each with a different

I think that's a battle you need to be having with Google. They're the ones misusing the email standards. Or more likely there's a simple spelling error somewhere where the address is being stored. In

Thank you Shal, Sorry for the lack of patience. When I was in IT (the 2nd Millennium), you didn't go on vacation to keep your job. :) I will await his/her return. Kind Regards.

I am the Owner of the group. I did as you describe below (Moderators tab) and it displays 4 moderators. 3 of them are me of which one is the owner (me). Can I simply create the GroupsIO thing and

Toby, Just joined this forum and did not see Mark’s message. Thanks for the update, now I understand. Al Sent: Thursday, July 26, 2018 11:30 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [GMF]

Chris, In the /Message Policies/ section of your group's /Settings/ page select either /Sender/ or /Moderators/ in the /Reply To/ control, and also check the /R//emove Other Relply Options/ box just

Hi anyone know how to turn off the reply to group link in the footer. I have an announcement group so members cannot post to it. So Reply to Group does not seem to make much sense. Hence I would like

Daniel, This is why I hate this topic. Politics causes some people to lose all perspective. Keep this clearly in mind: the only people being offered a free upgrade are those who run lists (groups) in

It's not illegal discrimination, but It is plainly discrimination nonetheless: giving a preference to some group of people while denying it to others based on some personal characteristic which you

Art, The transfer agent is on vacation: https://beta.groups.io/g/main/topic/23456809 Shal -- Help: /static/help More Help: /g/GroupManagersForum/wiki Even More Help:

Daniel, Keep in mind that Groups.io is not turning anyone away. All that has happened is that groups of a certain nature are offered a free upgrade to Premium. Some may consider it a distinction

Oh, members are definitely going to see it. Social media way beyond groups.io is going to see it. One does not deliberately discriminate against a large and active segment of the population without

As a free service, groups.io can advocate any political cause that it wants to and if the people who use the service don't like it they obviously can go elsewhere. However, it seems like a very poor

I invited [email protected] ( transfer@... )?to start transferring the Yahoo Group I own. Any reason for a delay?? Thank you. Ready to start the process. Art

I stand corrected. Another "factoid" learned long ago. I did a bit more research and agree that there are multiple interpretations about punctuation characters in the part of the email address before

Mark's vacation notice stated "Replies to support emails will be delayed during this time. Also, group transfers will be delayed as well." I interpret that to mean slower than normal response, as

Yep ... I've learned by going through the dot problem myself. Ellen