开云体育

I would argue that an on - line chat is nothing like that. A conversation between neighbours is just that, but it does not normally - and perhaps should not, take place in front of numerous

I have such a list and we do have problems. The list is described a conversation between neighbors — like a chat on the front porch or the back fence. No press releases except from the government.

Thank you, Shal. Legally, we are not supposed to discuss anything that is a topic of executive session outside that group. That's what I meant. ? Tamara Sent from my iPad, Strange words courtesy of

Hi, I'm new to Groups.io, a moderator of a handful of Yahoo groups (largest is 2000+ subscribers), not technically savvy, and could use some help. Most immediately, I’m trying to set up a small

That would be up to every individual group owner. My groups do not allow any discussion about Politics and Religion (Preaching) even when I was running a chat group.

?Ullmang, Any recommendations dealing with unfriendly, unneighborly, rude and even ?In my opinion, quash it before it poisons the group and drives away the friendly members. ? That's a good

You should establish Guidelines for the group and then enforce them.? The owner is providing a forum and sets the rules for participation in that forum.? Members that do not play by the rules can be

Ullmang, If you need to ask, you already know that there is a limit to "free speech". In fact, as a group owner, it is your obligation to not permit certain language per the Groups.io Terms and

Sent: Thursday, July 12, 2018 1:04 PM To: GMF Subject: [GMF] Transfer a Y!Group because of the Oath TOS? Ellen, The main thing bad about them is they believe they own the rights to everything you

Any recommendations dealing with unfriendly, unneighborly, rude and even hurtful language on a neighborhood group. We are a restricted membership, unmoderated, no Anonymous posts allowed. We just went

They can have anything I post through any of my groups or any of my members post through any of the groups. ? Most have gotten off the?net anyway. They are graphics, tags and sharing groups. ?

Ellen, ?No, the Oath TOS <https://policies.oath.com/us/en/oath/terms/otos/index.html> specifically states that you retain ownership of any IP rights that you hold in the content (that you posted or

I had a problem with them the minute they wanted me to sign giving them the rights to anything sent through them.? I should have kept that msg ... I didn’t. I just moved my groups out of there the

Barb B, 1) Can the address [email protected] also be used for the main group? > ?Yes.? ?No.? Subgroup names need only be unique within the group, so they can't be used in a format without the

Hi, I tried to find this topic because I thought I remembered reading something about but couldn't find it. So, when you have a main group with a subgroup, I know the emails "officially" become: Main

Jim H, Mark's service, Mark's rules. I respect that completely... but IMO one ?On beta Mark invited comment <https://beta.groups.io/g/main/topic/23242689#17662> from anyone who sees any issues with

Tamara ?, ? Some discussion has occurred in our Groups.io discussion group that needs What do you mean by "back"? If all of the messages in question were originally on the Y!Group then they should

Bill, ?I believe Jim was talking about different groups, some with *Reply To* set to *Group*, other groups set to *Sender*.? Those with *Reply To* set to *Group* are not affected by this change,

Thank you Shal, I see now I have reached that point - though I wasted a few days in the confusion zone :-(

Mark's proposal on beta was: "...by not stripping the incoming Reply-To for groups set to Reply To Sender Only (or tagged appropriately)" If (as you say above) your group is set as "Reply To -> Group