开云体育

Perhaps you could take the trouble to explain why , exactly. This entire discussion is becoming uncomfortably polarised, and at the moment I can see no way out of the impasse. The number of responses

Thanks Shal, Everyone here was correct, 1+1 has to fix the actual problem. I have a MINIMUM of five ways I can work around it if they do not. Thanks for everyone's help and patience in this matter.

Hi Shal, thanks for info. I have not yet begun to experiment. Is the Wiki searchable. It has been a long time since I used a Wiki to organize legal Information I understand that any professional

Mark Fletcher (the guy who runs this thing) might have something set up to provide enhanced technical support for Enterprise groups. You might try contacting him directly at [email protected]?to see

Right, there should have been a hyphen - "Delete-account functionality" The caps should have made the parsing clear but didn't. :) ? -- J

Paul, There are a few ways to do this in Groups.io: One way is to organize the members into subgroups; each subgroup has its own message archive. /static/help#subgroups

Thanks. No wonder I was totally lost. I read it as deleting some functionality from an account. -- Gerald Boutin

> All > > I am a lawyer and an experienced volunteer manager of LSoft Listservs used > by several worldwide legal groups which follow legal developments in the > area of dispute resolution not using

Bruce, am just seeing this now. I missed it in the thread. I'm not proposing anything. This is just the way I've chosen to handle it for my group, which I can do because we pay for the privilege. :)

This will be my last post on this topic before I mute it (you're probably all glad to hear that). I joined GIO about six weeks ago and moved my two groups two weeks later. "Spam problems" have been

I'm saving them the trouble of clicking a meaningless (to them) link to undo a meaningless (to them) action, something they themselves had nothing to do with. Even if they click on the resubscribe

J, It is vitally different: the member had to take an action. No matter how simple the action, the member had to be mentally engaged enough to carry it out. Your way is passive.

J -- Let me make sure I understand. Whether they're set to "no email" or they are removed from the group, your practice will be to immediately reinstate them, thereby subverting whatever process is

Maybe the solution is legal. Maybe Mark should get himself a bulldog lawyer and sue the pants off whatever companies are doing this to groups.io for damaging his business. Tortious interference with

Of course it does. And I was waiting for that exact response. My point is that it's virtually no different from giving them a link to resubscribe. Seriously. What's the epsilon of difference? Of

Jeremy, I don't see how suspending message delivery by a different means (e.g. No Mail) would be any more effective at resolving the issue. An advantage to "dismemberment" is that it correctly handles

Here’s another two cents. Most of my members (family members of pediatric genetic disorder patients) can hardly handle an Email and I am a low intermediate user. Use the KISS principle, Keep It

J, Well, taking that act upon yourself certainly defeats the "forcing function", the point of which was to inconvenience the member as a motivation for them to do whatever is needed to avoid future

Rick, Only the one via GMF this time. Shal -- Help: /static/help More Help: /g/GroupManagersForum/wiki Even More Help: Search button at the top of Messages list

Ellen, This is part of Yahoo's new and somewhat confusing way of letting you stay signed in to more than one account at a time. You can then switch between signed in accounts without having to sign