On Tue, Jan 5, 2021 at 12:16 PM, Carla Nelson wrote:

Sorry to be slow, but where do I find the “no resizing” option (I am a new owner still learning). I poked around in the Admin/settings looking for anything about size but somehow missed it.

Go to Admin, Settings. Scroll down to Features, Photos.
See

Max Size In Photos Section?

?
Use the menu there to choose the first choice - no resizing.?
I use 1024 x 1024 rather than no resizing.

Members can also make changes to attachment size. In Subscription, Adv preferences. In Message Selection.
A member can decide on max attachment size in emails. If an attachment is larger, then a link is provided instead.

Frances



--

---

Help available from Groups.io help and GMF wiki.

?

开云体育

Shal,

I did a five year?projection based on the NEW pricing plan.

In the pricing plan Mark has defined the three list types by member size:

Free (Basic) - 100 members

Premium (Paid) - 400 members

Enterprise (Paid) - 1000 members

You are right, for the first year (2021), my list would be an Enterprise list cloaked as a Basic (Free) list, saving $4400/year by legacy pricing.? If Mark's pricing plan per member reflects

his cost per member to remain viable,? I don't think giving away $22,000 in revenue over five years is sustainable.

I also assumed that there wouldn't be a major price change for three years.? Admittedly this is overly optimistic, as there have been two pricing changes in the last two years.? And that also assumes?

that the pricing changes do not require adjustment (upward) for three years.? Finally I assumed that after three years providing Enterprise size lists with Free service will no longer be sustainable and

that Free lists of Premium size (or larger) will have to be converted to a paid list for groups.io to be sustainable in the near future.

So I presented my list with three basic five year scenarios:

1. Staying as a Basic list with a forced upgrade to Premium after three years at an annual cost of $1100 a year for $2200 total cost over five years
2. Upgrading now to Premium at $220/year for a five year annual cost of $1100
3. Staying as a basic list with a forced upgrade to Enterprise after three years at an annual cost of $4400 per year for $8800 total cost over five years.

My list is choosing #2 at 81% of the votes cast.

I made some?na?ve (not based on inside knowledge) assumptions:

1. Mark is committed to?a sustainable business model with higher cost lists paying for their service.
2. That it will take three years before additional pricing changes are made.
3. That Legacy paid lists will be? upgraded to fee per member pricing AFTER large free lists are asked to upgrade
4. That the fee per member pricing for a Premium list can be avoided in the next five years by upgrading to Premium before Jan18th.
5. That Free lists that have grown into the size of a Premium or Enterprise lists will need to become paid lists in the future.

The view five years from now is much different than the view today.? My list members recognize that our list size does not justify continuation as a free list and

they are willing to become a Paid list to sustain the list in the future.? In return image storage can be increased since the space available is sixty times larger than what we have been using.

The Enterprise plan far exceeds are needs as do the costs exceed are ability to pay.? The list would disband it forced to upgrade to Enterprise level.

--
ken clark

www.shastasprings.com

As new moderators of a 20-year-old group that has migrated from Yahoo,? we have some questions about the below listed restricted dedicated groups and content.

We decided to open a subgroup for OT discussion from the main group mission. We hoped to have an open dialogue on various topics that might include but are not specific to? politics, health, etc.? As it turns out, some of our more vocal members have alternative views and post information and links to support the info they share. Our subgroup is not dedicated to any of the below-restricted groups or content.? However, some of these subjects do arise and our members would like to share and discuss them openly without restriction. They feel that that the groupsio definition of "restricted groups and content" is too vague and undefined, leaving the members and moderators to decide arbitrarily what is acceptable and what is a violation. They feel moderation can and will be based on moderators' own personal predilections. They feel censured and unsure of what is appropriate to post. And moderators are unsure of what discussions will be seen as violating groupsio restricted content. Members have demanded, tongue in cheek, for a list of approved topics...Definitions of conspiracy theories, hoaxes, and approved sources.? They are a lively bunch.

As a moderator, we see value in the sharing and discussion of information that falls into some of the restricted categories to be discussed, questioned, and debated. Otherewise they head back to the echo chambers. But I am worried there will be repercussions of some sort if topics or content crosses the somewhat invisible lines? The priority is the Main list and its mission. We would let the discussion happen, as long as it remains civil and respectful, and take our chances. But not if it can affect our Main group or our good standing on groups.io.? It would help to know what the repercussions might be so we can let the members know. They need to know that the moderators are not moderating willy nilly.?

My questions are:

• If we allow open discussion in our subgroup of topics related to politics and health, which may fall into the categories listed below, will we be violating the iogroups guidelines?
• What makes a group or subgroup" dedicated or promotion of"?
• What happens to groups that accidentally violate these guidelines? Can consequences affect the Main-group? Is a warning issued??
• How does iogroups know what's being discussed? Can it see the conversations??

Our priority is our Main group which has a very narrow focus, with no issue.
We opened the subgroup so people that connect in one area can discuss more freely in other areas not specific to the main group, as not to distract from the mission.? We didn't realize that there were groups.io restrictions and we did not realize that our members would want to discuss things that broached those categories. We as moderators are looking for clarity to help guide our members and ourselves.?

We welcome any thoughts and information and experience that this group can share! Thank you in advance.?



/helpcenter/faq/1/group-owner-moderator-faq/q-what-types-of-groups-are-not

A:?Groups.io does not permit these types of groups and content:

• Pornography, adult content, or nudity
• Harassment of any kind
• Groups that share media or content whose distribution would be in violation of copyright law
• Groups dedicated to the promotion of extreme, hateful, or exclusionary ideas, including, but not limited to, the alt-right
• Groups dedicated to the promotion of conspiracy theories, including, but not limited to, Gamergate, Pizzagate, and Qanon
• Groups dedicated to the promotion of anti-vaccination ideologies
• Groups that are designed strictly to use the Groups.io directory as an advertisement for something other than the group itself

Sorry to be slow, but where do I find the “no resizing” option (I am a new owner still learning). I poked around in the Admin/settings looking for anything about size but somehow missed it.

On Tue, Jan 5, 2021 at 03:47 AM, Andy Wedge wrote:

You don't mention how you are exactly viewing these images. Is this after you have sent it via Groups.io or before?

After uploading! I am usually composing on the web, using insert to bring in a pic. The pictures look clear on my camera roll, but once inserted into a forum post it is blurred. This makes it hard to read screenshots.

Many thanks Frances

Exactly what I was looking for

I had not envisaged creating any more so hadn't saved the pdf from when I think you posted before

Now I find I may need to as a group owner has passed away and there does not seem to be a way of taking over a group

Nivard Ovington in Cornwall (UK)

On Tue, Jan 5, 2021 at 11:03 AM, Nivard Ovington wrote:

I have searched the wiki but could not find anything on the changes and the dates thereof to free groups

I created one 8th November 2020 and wanted to know what facilities it has compared to one created now

You can start with this document in Files on GMF.
/g/GroupManagersForum/files/Groups.io%20features%20%28includes%20legacy%20stuff%29.pdf
As you see, there are no changes since November 2020.

And for the upcoming changes, see?

Frances

?
--

---

Help available from Groups.io help and GMF wiki.

?

I have searched the wiki but could not find anything on the changes and the dates thereof to free groups

I created one 8th November 2020 and wanted to know what facilities it has compared to one created now


--
Nivard Ovington in Cornwall (UK)

I totally agree with you that the pictures are not as good as say Yahoo. There are other topics on this in the GMF and you can search the archives - try blurry.

On Mon, Jan 4, 2021 at 12:41 PM, Susan D'Entremont wrote:

What's the catch??

I was not on the BOD when the contract was made with Morgan, the owner of Groupworks. I was a beta tester and helped implement the roll out nationwide to a non profit. Morgan and Spencer, co-founders of GW are both very accessble by phone and are great at handholding and support.

I am sure much has changed in the past 3 years, so it would be best to contact them directly if interested. I don't know of the catch. Like GIO being entirely free and full featured just 18 months ago, GW's vision was to meet the needs for clubs using a no cost model to the club owners. Like Mark has discovered with GIO, the GW free "no catch" model may not be sustainable going forward. However, in the past few months GW has introduced one discreet, static ad on each screen so I suspect that is now their funding source.

I find most GW users are over 55. They are the sort that don't want to deal with headaches of configuring group settings, managing subscriptions, etc. They just want to log in and have all their club information presented to them.

Personally, my problem with Groupworks is the fact that it's web only access. Where GIO offers real-time individual email delivery and exchange of information over email, Group Works forces users to communicate only by logging into their website. Their digest is limited to none, daily, weekly or 3 times a week. It contains a subject only and I found myself wasting time to log in only to discover the post was of no interest to me.?There is no way to communicate?a pressing, time sensitive matter to the members of your group. You would have to use traditional email to do that.?

But for clubs and hobbyists whose sole reason is routine meeting information, event registration, dues collection and record keeping, access to newsletters, files calendars, tutorials, meetings, etc it works well. Especially if your members are computer challenged or elderly. The font is large and high contrast for easier reading. The help files are large print PDFs and videos.

GW group Owners have ultimate control over their group members with direct add, removal and email address changes. Individuals cannot join GW. They can only join if the group owner or admin directly adds their name and email. At that point, the member receives an email from GW to create a password. Once they do that and log in, they land on their club's homepage.

GW serves a niche need in the online group world.
--
Sandi Dickenson

On Tue, Jan 5, 2021 at 10:28 AM, Annie Green wrote:

I want to create an investment subgroup.? How do I do this.

Whether you can create a subgroup depends on your group plan. Do you have a premium or enterprise plan? Then it is possible.

If you have a basic group, you will need to check when your group was formed. If it is legacy enabled, (before 1/15/2020), you can create subgroups.
See this file on GMF.
/g/GroupManagersForum/files/Groups.io%20features%20%28includes%20legacy%20stuff%29.pdf
?
Here's the help pages on creating subgroups.
/helpcenter/ownersmanual/1/using-subgroups

Frances

--

---

Help available from Groups.io help and GMF wiki.

?

I want to create an investment subgroup.? How do I do this.

The API solution would be the only choice other than manually viewing the activity of each user individually. IMHO, however, I recommend replacing "re-authenticate" with "maintain membership" as there is no authentication involved.
--
Jim

开云体育

On Tue, Jan 5, 2021 at 03:32 AM, Carla Nelson wrote:

Every image I try to attach or embed in a message comes up as blurry and illegible, no matter the size.

You don't mention how you are exactly viewing these images. Is this after you have sent it via Groups.io or before?

Don't forget that embedded images are reduced to 640px in the long dimension and those attached to emails may be resized depending upon your group settings (See Admin > Settings > Message Policies).

The Owners' Manual gives more detail.

Andy

On Sun, Dec 27, 2020 at 03:24 PM, Bruce Bowman wrote:

Any Yahoo Mail addresses that bounce with a "554 mailbox is disabled" error can be safely deleted.?Ref:?/g/GroupManagersForum/message/30601?

Yahoo has been purging "inactive" YMail addresses only a monthly basis and this is the error that comes back when you attempt to send something to one of them.

Sorry for returning to the topic, but I have another doubt.
After disabling No Mail, I sent a special notice to the group to check members and so far I have about 40 Yanoo accounts bouncing with the above mentioned error message.
Strangely, their latest succesful delivery shows the same date (either guidelines or welcome notice sent in february 2018!).

Before removing them, however, I wonder: can a member with a (red or blue) bouncing account still access the group and read messages via web?

Regards,
Marina

开云体育

Did you send it from a gmail address to a gmail group? ??

--
Help: /helpcenter
More Help: /g/GroupManagersForum/wiki
Even More Help: Search button at the top of Messages list

开云体育

I polled the 1900 members of my free group about the change to fee per member pricing.? AS a large group, Enterprise size in the new pricing plan; upgrading now to Premium would save

almost nine?hundred dollars a year to avoid the fee per member schedule for upgrades after Jan 18th.In four days I have had 130 responses, 81% favored upgrading now, versus staying free

and wait for the fee per member prices to drop later.? One subscriber actually favored upgrade to Enterprise at $2200 per year.? I have had twenty members leave, obviously afraid of fee per

member pricing.? I feel confident of more than enough donations to keep the list afloat.? I use Paypal to process payments for my part-time business.? I don't want to mix funds so am planning on a new,

separate Paypal account just to collect subscriber donations.??

--
ken clark

www.shastasprings.com

I have subscribed to the $20 per month subscription, just FYI.