¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

Date

Re: Understanding message in Email Delivery History

 

Yvette,


Response
2.6.0 <[email protected]> [InternalId=6433861077272, Hostname=] 12740 bytes in 0.353, 35.158 KB/sec Queued mail for delivery -> 250 2.1.5
Does this mean that the person's email provider is holding the message we sent and waiting to deliver it

In computer terms a queue does not imply a human-perceptible delay. More to the point, a code beginning with 2 means success, no further intervention is required.

The statement "Queued mail for delivery" may be technically accurate, but completely meaningless to users: the mail probably passed through that queue and reached the member's Inbox in a fraction of a second.

or does it mean that the person's response to us is waiting to be delivered to us?

No, the Email Delivery History is only about outbound messages, from the group to the members.

Problems related to inbound messages will show up in the group's Activity Log.
Shal


--
Help: /static/help
More Help: /g/GroupManagersForum/wiki
Even More Help: Search button at the top of Messages list


Re: Understanding message in Email Delivery History

 

This means that outlook accepted the email from your group and has queued it for delivery to the person.? How long it's held is anyone's guess.? If the inbox were full, it would be a different code number instead of 2.6.0, probably 4.2.2 or 5.2.2.? I don't know that it's the best source, but there's a decent explanation at http://emailaddressmanager.com/tips/codes.html

Duane
--
Help: /static/help
GMF's Wiki: /g/GroupManagersForum/wiki
Search button at the top of Messages list
A few site FAQs: /static/pricing#frequently-asked-questions


Understanding message in Email Delivery History

Yvette Money
 

I apologize if this seems too basic to most, but I don't understand what the response line is actually telling me because I don't understand the codes listed.? I am just wondering about this message in a potential member's Email Delivery History.? We are awaiting a response from this person before we approve their membership application and the deadline for approval is looming.? This is what I see:

Most Recent Successful Delivery

Message
Post To Subscriber
Delivered
Dec 5
Response
2.6.0 <[email protected]> [InternalId=6433861077272, Hostname=AM5EUR03HT157.eop-EUR03.prod.protection.outlook.com] 12740 bytes in 0.353, 35.158 KB/sec Queued mail for delivery -> 250 2.1.5
Does this mean that the person's email provider is holding the message we sent and waiting to deliver it (possibly because the inbox is full), or does it mean that the person's response to us is waiting to be delivered to us?
--
Yvette in Ontario


Re: email to text

 

Paul,


we get a 505 error when trying to invite??970541xxxx@...? to support email to text.?

Others?have had problems using email-to-text gateways with Groups.io. I don't know if they were able to resolve the problems. Apparently different carriers' gateways behave differently.

See also the search results in GMF for "gateway".

Shal

--
Help: /static/help
More Help: /g/GroupManagersForum/wiki
Even More Help: Search button at the top of Messages list


email to text

Paul Hesson
 

we get a 505 error when trying to invite??970541xxxx@...? to support email to text.? Only a problem with T-Mobile.? Att and verison as well as many others work fine.? Only T-Mobile is a problem.


Re: Default password?

 

On Dec 11, 2018, at 5:16 PM, Duane <txpigeon@...> wrote:

On Tue, Dec 11, 2018 at 04:11 PM, Michael Pavan wrote:
It looks like its replacement is:
"Profile and Email Address - Identity, changing email address, adding an email alias, merging accounts.¡±
No, the replacement (it was actually split into separate subjects), with correct wording is now:
/g/GroupManagersForum/wiki/Logging-in-and-How-to-Set-a-Personal-Password
OK, and the information there looks good and presented well.


Wikis are "live", so you can't just save a link and expect it to work forever.
Help links that are temporary are sort of a 'moving target' - that makes them problematic to include in a Member Notices message, which can be automatically sent to new users who are most likely to need the information.

The links should be permanent for the same subject(s) that still needs addressing, only the explanation should be updated. Misnamed Wikis should contain a link (or links) to its/their replacement.

Permanent links would be more helpful for users, plus Owners/Moderators and GMF might not have to deal with those receptive inquiries.

Wikis are only required for what is not clear, nor intuitive.


Re: So no PRIVATE MESSAGING, right? Any hope it will be implemented?

 

Janie,


Disappointed upon searching that PM's don't exist in the IO Groups, right? So the members simply email each other?

Members can initiate PM's to other members via the group's Directory - if the Directory is enabled in the group and if the member you wish to contact has opted to make his/her profile available to other members.

This method sends an email to the other member, without you (the sender) needing to know the other member's address. But your address will be exposed to the other member (the email will be From your address) so that the other member can reply to you privately, by email.

As Bruce mentioned, there is (as yet?) no Inbox or other means to receive such private messages within the Groups.io web interface. So you can only initiate the private conversation here, replies must go through email.

Shal


--
Help: /static/help
More Help: /g/GroupManagersForum/wiki
Even More Help: Search button at the top of Messages list


Re: Is there anyway to change the display of postings to show the Posting number first in the threads?

 

Thanks Toby! I will look into that.


Re: Default password?

Jim Higgins
 

Received from Michael Pavan at 12/11/2018 09:20 PM UTC:

To say users can access the website without a password by using a "login link" is misleading as "login links" are merely temporary passwords. There is no difference in what access they enable, only the duration of access. "Login links" should always include the explanation that they are temporary (30 day) passwords, and the suggestion to create a permanent password along with the explanation of how little effort is required to "upgrade" a login link to a (permanent) password.

My testing reveals that the cookie created by clicking a "login link" does indeed expire in 30 days, BUT it is renewed for 30 days upon each new visit so unless you fail to visit for 30 days, or manually log out, it's a permanent login.

Jim H


Re: Default password?

 

On Tue, Dec 11, 2018 at 04:11 PM, Michael Pavan wrote:
It looks like its replacement is:
"Profile and Email Address - Identity, changing email address, adding an email alias, merging accounts.¡±
No, the replacement (it was actually split into separate subjects), with correct wording is now:
/g/GroupManagersForum/wiki/Logging-in-and-How-to-Set-a-Personal-Password
Wikis are "live", so you can't just save a link and expect it to work forever.

Duane
--
Help: /static/help
GMF's Wiki: /g/GroupManagersForum/wiki
Search button at the top of Messages list
A few site FAQs: /static/pricing#frequently-asked-questions


Re: Is there anyway to change the display of postings to show the Posting number first in the threads?

 

Joe, I see what you're trying to do.? I do that a lot to capture and work with data.? But groups.io is not displaying a tabular view with columns so it's gonna be hard to capture what you want in a way that works (to load into a spreadsheet for example).
Best bet is to find an mbox to csv converter like this ->?

(I googled 'read mbox excel' to find it, there may be others)
Toby


Re: Default password?

 

Duane,

On Dec 10, 2018, at 5:20 PM, Duane <txpigeon@...> wrote:

On Mon, Dec 10, 2018 at 12:44 PM, Michael Pavan wrote:
OK, then the ¡¯30 day¡¯ part of the explanation needs updating/correction
I was accepting that I misstated the duration of a ¡®login link¡¯ and was agreeing that needed updating/correction.
It's been correct on the wiki page since Nov 15.
Your comment makes me believe you did not understand my complete suggestion about ¡®passwords¡¯ vs ¡®login links' and/or I was unclear in my acceptance of your critique of that part of my suggestion:


What I had suggested:
| Passwords/login links
| To say users can access the website without a password by using a ¡®login link¡¯ is misleading as ¡®login links¡¯ are merely temporary passwords. There is no difference in what access they enable, only the duration of access. ¡®Login links¡¯ should always include the explanation that they are temporary (30 day) passwords, and the suggestion to create a permanent password along with the explanation of how little effort is required to ¡®upgrade¡¯ a login link to a (permanent) password.

The GMF Wiki page that I was referring to:
"GroupManagersForum/wiki/How-to-Set-a-Personal-Password-and-Profile%3B-Changing-Email-Address"
/g/GroupManagersForum/wiki/How-to-Set-a-Personal-Password-and-Profile%3B-Changing-Email-Address
now seems to no longer exist.

It looks like its replacement is:
"Profile and Email Address - Identity, changing email address, adding an email alias, merging accounts.¡±
/g/GroupManagersForum/wiki/Profile-and-Email-Address-and-Merging-Accounts
[ in the "Advice to Group Members¡± section of /g/GroupManagersForum/wiki/home ]
which also does not identify ¡®login links¡¯ as temporary passwords, nor how simple it is to upgrade a ¡®login link¡¯ to a (permanent) password.

Michael


Re: So no PRIVATE MESSAGING, right? Any hope it will be implemented?

 

On Tue, Dec 11, 2018 at 02:53 PM, Janie wrote:
By the way, I mean the ability of one member to "private message" another member via the system.
You can enter a private message to someone via groups.io, but they are received by email only...they are not made available online, or even retained in any way by the system that I know of. Perhaps that will be a feature of the groups.io app, but for now it does not exist.

Sorry,
Bruce?
--
The system Help is your friend.??/static/help


Re: So no PRIVATE MESSAGING, right? Any hope it will be implemented?

 

Duane, so the only way in IO for one member to communicate directly to another member privately is just to email them, correct??


Re: So no PRIVATE MESSAGING, right? Any hope it will be implemented?

 

On Tue, Dec 11, 2018 at 01:54 PM, Janie wrote:
the ability to send a message directly to another member
That's what the Private option does, albeit via email.

Duane
--
Help: /static/help
GMF's Wiki: /g/GroupManagersForum/wiki
Search button at the top of Messages list
A few site FAQs: /static/pricing#frequently-asked-questions


Re: Is there anyway to change the display of postings to show the Posting number first in the threads?

 
Edited

You should be able to accomplish the same thing by using the Messages view, /g/GroupManagersForum/messages, since they get numbered as they come in.? You can reverse the sort order by using the Date at the upper right.

Duane
--
Help: /static/help
GMF's Wiki: /g/GroupManagersForum/wiki
Search button at the top of Messages list
A few site FAQs: /static/pricing#frequently-asked-questions


Is there anyway to change the display of postings to show the Posting number first in the threads?

 

On YahooGroups when I would go to look at the threads It could display them in the "Relaxed" "Slim" form with the message number first, then the message subject and then the user who submitted it and the date submitted. I would then manually copy this data and put it into a spreadsheet which allowed me to work with each posting using its posting number as the reference number.

I do not see a way to display the data on Groups.io like that (i.e. with the message number first). I tried exporting my group data to see if that would give me what I needed, but the json files were not showing what I needed and when I tried to open the Mbox file it was way to much info to parse for my needs.

Any idea on how to do this? I have attached a screen shot from YahooGroups of how the messages would display.

TIA!

?


Re: So no PRIVATE MESSAGING, right? Any hope it will be implemented?

 

But the Chat function is not a private conversation between one member to another, correct? I'm referring to what Yahoo had and still has---the ability to send a message directly to another member, so that only you and the member you message are in the conversation, and you and the member are the only ones who can see the conversation between you two.?


Re: So no PRIVATE MESSAGING, right? Any hope it will be implemented?

 

By the way, I mean the ability of one member to "private message" another member via the system. Not about overall group privacy. Just the ability to "private" message another member. Yahoo had it and am surprised IO doesn't.


Re: So no PRIVATE MESSAGING, right? Any hope it will be implemented?

 

Disappointed upon searching that PM's don't exist in the IO Groups,
right? So the members simply email each other?
Janie
When replying from the web page, members compose their reply in the reply window and then need to click on the PRIVATE button in the lower right hand corner below the window to reply to just the sender.

Dano