开云体育

Sharon, That is certainly the intent. One can legitimately question whether the planning and execution within Groups.io as an organization will accomplish that intent. For the current situation, Mark

I’m assuming from all I have read is that this service is on a firm footing and will be “permanent.” Is that right? It seems like a much better business model than other services which are

No because I don't cause backscatter: instead of accepting spam and after that sending NDR (new emails / bounce messages) my sever refuses to accept what it classifies as spam. The refusal is an

Sharon, I don't think any of that has changed: a digest is sent whenever there's 12 (was 25) new messages to send, or when there is at least one new message to send and it is 10pm U.S. Pacific time

Another question — when are digest(s) sent? Does the first one go out after 12 messages are received? Sharon

Sharon, Yup, plus one to start a third. Assuming that many come in over the course of the day. Shal

Most email users just use it. They read the messages they receive, respond or send a new message. Yesterday I had to explain to a person who had been using email for 20 years that messages from the

What happens to the rest of the messages? A second digest message? Sharon ---- Sharon Villines, Historic Takoma Park, Washington DC Where all roads lead to Casablanca

Xaun Loc, That kind of Backscatter was a big problem early in the heyday of the spambots. Not so much any more: the receiving email services have generally gotten a lot smarter about handling messages

From: Lena You're right that spammers never read rejection messages, unfortunately the people whose address was spoofed as the sender get to read thousands of those rejection messages.

I moved to Groups.io and after that I invited all the bouncing members again. Almost 3200 members were moved and ca 500 bounced. About 30 of them joined us again on io and I guess that the rest of the

JimF, What makes you think I mightn't have? I simply asserted that you've missed other parts of the discussion. You're preaching to the choir. The only thing I recall being questioned was how far one

Shal (et all) - You commented: The [spam management] problem may seem simple if you only take it that far. However there is a key point of this discussion that is missing here. And that is the

Jeff, The duplicates are due to emailed responses (namely, Groups.io does not clip the prior photo). The reason changing the order of the emailed photos page helps is to aid in *removal* of those

Part of Gmail spam filtering can be turned off: in Gmail web-interface the gear icon - Settings - Filters and Blocked Addresses - Create a new filter - in "Doesn't have" type a long string of random

I have only one comment... :) Our home page is *FULL* of duplicate photos. All the time. Changing the order didn't help. Ours is a conversation group. Reply to all happens a lot, and no one seems to

Louise, ? ? ? ? ? In your case, why could you not send a message out to the existing group notifying the group of your intent to move? ? As a part of that message you might (I don't know what

I have considered getting a very large yahoo group transferred to io. The group has been in existence for nearly 2 decades so includes many members who are no longer active. I think my attempts to

Louise, Interesting. Does the brown type have a documented meaning. Is that, for example, the color of all the messages in your Spam folder? That's too bad. I think you're right that there are some,

James, The problem may seem simple if you only take it that far. However there is a key point of this discussion that is missing here. And that is the disposition of messages that land automatically