¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

Date

Re: Photos and other images in email, some background

 

Lena,

data: doesn't consume storage where the 1 GB free limit is.
Interesting point. I wonder if that gives Mark a motive to detect the use of data: and treat it as if it had been cid:, at least for the purpose of storage.

The user's subscription control for max attachment size is about the metering or other download restrictions some users may face, particularly on mobile devices. And for that purpose I think it would be more useful if Mark did detect data: and apply the same restrictions.

Shal


Re: question about deleting a subgroup

 

jeffp,

Lena wrote:

Can you rename the subgroup before deleting it?
That's a good point, and I should have thought of it. In Yahoo Groups (and no doubt Groups.io) renaming a group does not reserve the old name.

If the same holds true for Groups.io subgroups then you could rename the subgroup to something arbitrary before deleting it. That way you can pick any arbitrary name to make non-reusable, leaving the desired name free for reuse.

Shal


Transferring Wiki

 

One of my organizations has a wiki on Google Sites. Is it possible to transfer a wiki?

Sharon
----
Sharon Villines, Historic Takoma Park
In Washington DC, Where all roads lead to Casablanca


Transferring Two Groups into One Group

 

Can two Yahoo groups be transferred and combined into one Groups.io?

One of my groups had one email address for 2 years and then changed. Both lists have to be searched to find historically important information on policies, etc.

Sharon
----
Sharon Villines, Historic Takoma Park
In Washington DC, Where all roads lead to Casablanca


Wiki

 

Are there any directions for using the Wiki?

And does it count in the files storage limitation?

Sharon
----
Sharon Villines, Historic Takoma Park
In Washington DC, Where all roads lead to Casablanca


Re: Posting a photo

 

On Sun, Sep 4, 2016 at 02:46 pm, Shal Farley wrote:
I'm also curious about the image showing in full-feature digest messages. Is it shown at full size, inline in the message as sent, or is it shown as a thumbnail that one can open?

?It is shown full size. ?

Here is one of the facebook integration photos that came in daily digest. Sorry but I can't find any of the test photos I did. Integration may be different as it appears a normal size on line but when posted to groups.io even in messages it is massive:

You can see that even with my large laptop the whole picture needed scrolling to see. ?Made members using cell phones to view the messages loose their minds.?

Don't worry, we got it fixed by resizing the photos before they got uploaded to Facebook. Now they appear like this in the daily digest:


Yes it would be helpful if you set up a test, that way we'd all know what to expect when photos are added either remotely or inline.?

I get this forum via Fully Featured Daily Digest and would be happy to report (do you want screen shots?) what I see. ?All I know for sure is that pictures (not from photo albums) from websites remotely posted (copied from webiste and pasted into message) do show up in daily digest. ?How they appear in other message options, (we don't allow attachments/photos in messages) is hit and miss as I was testing various things, with so many other things on the go. ?


As a test, here is an inline photo that is pretty large. I did no resizing. ?


--
-LeeAnne

?Archivist


Re: Photos and other images in email, some background

 

On Sun, Sep 4, 2016 at 10:30 pm, Shal Farley wrote:

data: This scheme is newer, and tells the user interface that the image
file is encoded right here in the message body (within the <img> tag),
not in a separate file.
One could argue that the Max Attachment Size setting shouldn't affect this
scheme, because the data: scheme is technically not an attachment. But the
counter argument is that ignoring the data: scheme defeats the purpose of the
attachment limit: to reduce the data consumed by the message.
data: doesn't consume storage where the 1 GB free limit is.


Re: question about deleting a subgroup

 

On Mon, Sep 5, 2016 at 05:22 pm, Jeff Powell wrote:

having that subgroup
around - but locked down - is going to cause confusion for our members.
Can you rename the subgroup before deleting it?


Re: question about deleting a subgroup

Jeff Powell
 

On Mon, Sep 5, 2016 at 11:28 am, Shal Farley wrote:
jeffp,

Mark answered my submission to [email protected]. His answer was very
concise:

We don't currently recycle group names except when asked. If you run
into this, you can email us and we're recycle a given name for you.
That's not at all the answer I would have expected. Or rather, I would have expected that answer for the primary group names, but not the names of subgroups.

However I just verified it in my test group.

I don't see a reason for this restriction on subgroup names. I think it must be just an artifact of the subgroup implementation being largely the same as primary group implementation.

Shal

I agree that it is a bit of a surprise. And as I work with the group we're planning on transferring soon, I keep thinking that having that subgroup around - but locked down - is going to cause confusion for our members. I need to talk with the other moderators about it, but we may delete it and then ask Mark to make the name available to us again in the future.

It seems that - at least in most cases - subgroups would be created only by owners or moderators, not regular users. In such a case, the deletion of a subgroup should be a relatively rare thing, and not something done lightly. Making the names available again in that case seems rational, but maybe it's a challenge in the system as it is implemented.

In any case, we'll get by. It's just not a place where this system follows the principle of least surprise.


Re: question about deleting a subgroup

 

jeffp,

Mark answered my submission to [email protected]. His answer was very
concise:

We don't currently recycle group names except when asked. If you run
into this, you can email us and we're recycle a given name for you.
That's not at all the answer I would have expected. Or rather, I would have expected that answer for the primary group names, but not the names of subgroups.

However I just verified it in my test group.

I don't see a reason for this restriction on subgroup names. I think it must be just an artifact of the subgroup implementation being largely the same as primary group implementation.

Shal


Re: searching for hashtags

 

On Sun, Sep 4, 2016 at 06:07 pm, J_catlady wrote:


Before I make any suggestion/comment about this on beta or report a bug, I
want to make sure I'm not missing something: shouldn't clicking on a hashtag
on the home page take you to the messages with that hashtag, instead of just
to the messages list??
I already reported this to support.


Re: Photos and other images in email, some background

 

LeeAnne,

I wrote:

Plain Text messages

A plain text message cannot have an image (or any other formatting)
contained within the message body. It can however carry attached files,
and files containing photos or other images can be carried that way.
A factor that can affect delivery of attached image files: if a member has set a Max Attachment Size in the Advanced Preferences section of his/her group Subscription, and the image file exceeds the limit, then the attached file is removed from the message sent to that member, and a link to the site placed at the bottom of the message instead.

HTML (formatted) messages
...
cid: (content ID). ... It tells the receiving email user interface that
the image is contained in an attached file within this email message,
and the ID tells it which attached file is used for this <img> tag.
The member's Max Attachments Size affects this scheme as well, removing the image attachment and instead placing a link to its file on the group's site at the bottom of the message.

data: This scheme is newer, and tells the user interface that the image
file is encoded right here in the message body (within the <img> tag),
not in a separate file.
I'm not sure if that limit is applied to this scheme. I'd test it if I knew of a way to generate test messages that use this scheme, but the user interfaces I've tried (Gmail's web interface, Thunderbird, and Eudora) only generate the cid: scheme. Or if they can generate the data: scheme, I've not figured out how.

One could argue that the Max Attachment Size setting shouldn't affect this scheme, because the data: scheme is technically not an attachment. But the counter argument is that ignoring the data: scheme defeats the purpose of the attachment limit: to reduce the data consumed by the message.

http: (Hyper Text Transfer Protocol). This scheme tells the receiving
mail interface to fetch the image file from a server on the internet.
This one should not be affected: the data representing the image is not in the message.

Shal


Re: searching for hashtags

J_catlady
 

On Sun, Sep 4, 2016 at 06:25 pm, Duane wrote:
Besides the home page, it also behaves the same on the Topics view and Messages view.

Yes, right, I see that now. I'll add a p.s. to my bug report and cc you.

J?


Re: searching for hashtags

J_Olivia Catlady
 

I can't parse your sentence but I will report at least the bug I mentioned.

Sent from my iPhone

On Sep 4, 2016, at 6:23 PM, Duane <txpigeon@...> wrote:

I would expect it to do the search like it does on the Hashtag page wherever it is clicked on. Besides the home page, it also behaves the same on the Topics view and Messages view. It looks like the (bad) links use the "topics?q=#hashtag" argument instead of "search?q=#hashtag" like it does on the Hashtag page.

Duane



Re: searching for hashtags

 

I would expect it to do the search like it does on the Hashtag page wherever it is clicked on. Besides the home page, it also behaves the same on the Topics view and Messages view. It looks like the (bad) links use the "topics?q=#hashtag" argument instead of "search?q=#hashtag" like it does on the Hashtag page.

Duane


searching for hashtags

J_catlady
 

Before I make any suggestion/comment about this on beta or report a bug, I want to make sure I'm not missing something: shouldn't clicking on a hashtag on the home page take you to the messages with that hashtag, instead of just to the messages list??

J


Re: Posting a photo

 

LeeAnne,

Our group doesn't allow posting in messages but you can paste and copy
from other websites (called remote something or other?)
If you copy/paste from a website chances are that the image will be conveyed in an HTML message using the http: scheme - aka a "remote" image. See my longer post on the subject:
/g/GroupManagersForum/message/756

I did some experimenting on how copied and pasted pictures are viewed by
various ways member's receive their emailed messages. It turns out that
copied and pasted pics only show up in Daily Digest. Members receiving
messages by individual or plain daily digest may not be aware there is a
pasted and copied picture in a message.
That's a surprising result. I would expect that members receiving individual messages would have the image available, but might have to tell their user interface that it is ok to display remote images.

I'm also curious about the image showing in full-feature digest messages. Is it shown at full size, inline in the message as sent, or is it shown as a thumbnail that one can open?

I have no idea if this is true of inline pictures but you might want to
check that if pics are vital to a post.
Would it be helpful if I created a table in GMF's database where we can log the results of various experiments with photos in messages? If enough people added their results we might rapidly cover the most commonly used email services and user interfaces.

Shal


Re: Transferring Lists

 

I had forgotten to make the [email protected] a moderator. And thought groups.io was going to send me an email. I reread the very good instructions. All is well again, so far.

Sharon.

On Sep 3, 2016, at 6:14 PM, J_catlady wrote:

You don't need to tell yahoo anything! The steps are (1) invited the transfer address, (2) once it's accepted the invite, make it a moderator and (3) send the transfer address an email saying you're ready for the transfer. The whole thing took less than 48 hours for my group, from invite to fully transferred group. I don't k ow why you're having these problems. Perhaps the process has changed since I moved my group inJanuary.
J

Sent from my iPhone
Excess quote trimmed by moderator]


Photos and other images in email, some background

 

LeeAnne wrote:

I did some experimenting on how copied and pasted pictures are viewed by
various ways member's receive their emailed messages. ...
/g/GroupManagersForum/message/747

I suspect GMF's wiki needs an advice article on the subject for Group Members but before delving into the research necessary to write it, I thought I'd set down some background information.

Plain Text messages

A plain text message cannot have an image (or any other formatting) contained within the message body. It can however carry attached files, and files containing photos or other images can be carried that way.

There is some variability in how various email user interfaces treat attached image files. Some will show the image immediately following the message body. Some show a thumbnail of the image with a link to open it to full size. Others will show only the file name and a link to open it.

How an attached image file is treated by a receiving user interface can also be influenced by how the image was encoded by the sending interface. The standard which covers such attachments (MIME - Multipurpose Internet Mail Extensions) allows various ways of describing the file content as well as various transfer encoding methods for carrying the file content. The choices made by the sending user interface may affect the presentation made by the receiving user interface.

HTML (formatted) messages

HTML (Hyper Text Markup Language) adds options for conveying an image to be presented as part of the message body. Within the <img> tag (which defines the position, size, and other characteristics of how the image is to be displayed) the src attribute tells the receiving email user interface where to find the image file. The fundamental choices are known as schemes.

cid: (content ID). This scheme is the default used by most user interfaces when you upload or open an image file from your computer's files. It tells the receiving email user interface that the image is contained in an attached file within this email message, and the ID tells it which attached file is used for this <img> tag.

data: This scheme is newer, and tells the user interface that the image file is encoded right here in the message body (within the <img> tag), not in a separate file.

http: (Hyper Text Transfer Protocol). This scheme tells the receiving mail interface to fetch the image file from a server on the internet. Images conveyed in this fashion are sometimes referred to as "remote" images. Remote images are often used in commercial email to reduce the size of the email message itself and lower transmission costs. However they do represent a privacy concern because the act of fetching the image file can be logged by the remote server and used to track if and when people read the email message. For this reason many email user interfaces will not automatically display a remote image. The user may be asked to click to display the image, or to always display remote images from that particular sender.

Bottom line

There are many reasons an image might not show up in received messages, or might show for some recipients but not others. And the sending user generally has limited ability to control how an image will be conveyed in their message.

Knowledge of these details can be crucial to determining what happened when messages don't display images properly. Fortunately the View Source (or View Original) of the received message will identify how the image was conveyed by the sending user interface. Unfortunately that alone will not tell how various recipient's email user interfaces might treat the image.

Shal


Re: Transferring Lists

Shadow Grafix
 

You don't have to ask yahoo's permission to moved your group. Just contact Mark or the transfer team and they'll make the move for you.

Hugs,
Judy

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Sharon Villines
Sent: Saturday, September 03, 2016 5:48 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [GMF] Transferring Lists

Thanks to everyone about the transfer process. I¡¯ve done everything I can do from this end.

The next step is an email asking for information for Yahoo about giving Groups.io permission to transfer. I was just wondering who long it might take to receive that.

I had to tell my list members about a potential move so they are overrunning me with questions.

Sharon, Moderator TakomaDC
----
Sharon Villines, Historic Takoma Park, Washington DC Where all roads lead to Casablanca