¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

Date

Re: three yahoo-email members started bouncing today

 

Same happened to me

On Dec 25, 2017, at 12:34 PM, Jonathan Sivier <jsivier@...> wrote:

I can't say that I have seen a sudden increase in Yahoo addresses bouncing. However, one thing I did notice is when I transferred several lists from Yahoo to Groups.io earlier this month was the number of Yahoo addresses that were immediately bounced. The error messages were something like "doesn't have a Yahoo account." Thinking back it seems like I hadn't seen ANY bouncing addresses in my Yahoo groups for some time. It's like the bounce reporting process at Yahoo wasn't working. There were other email providers as well, but you would think that Yahoo would at least know when it's own addresses were no longer viable. The numbers weren't huge, but having them come all at once was a bit of a surprise.

Jonathan

[excess quote trimmed by moderator]


Re: Automatic unsubscription ?

J_Catlady
 

On Mon, Dec 25, 2017 at 09:49 am, Jonathan Sivier wrote:
To me this seems like a poor way to handle this issue,
Since this is a draft, personally I'd delete that because you don't know what the alternatives are, it's likely to cause more flaming about the issue, etc.

Also, this part

until it does don't mark email as spam unless it really is.
neglects to mention that often (even, perhaps, most often), the message is marked as spam without the user's knowledge. I think you should mention that it might be done without their knowledge.
?
--
J


Re: three yahoo-email members started bouncing today

 

I can't say that I have seen a sudden increase in Yahoo addresses bouncing. However, one thing I did notice is when I transferred several lists from Yahoo to Groups.io earlier this month was the number of Yahoo addresses that were immediately bounced. The error messages were something like "doesn't have a Yahoo account." Thinking back it seems like I hadn't seen ANY bouncing addresses in my Yahoo groups for some time. It's like the bounce reporting process at Yahoo wasn't working. There were other email providers as well, but you would think that Yahoo would at least know when it's own addresses were no longer viable. The numbers weren't huge, but having them come all at once was a bit of a surprise.

Jonathan

On 12/25/2017 9:09 AM, J_Catlady wrote:
Thanks. I know more than I¡¯d ever want to know about bounce handling. I¡¯m just asking here whether other group owners now have a sudden spate of bouncing by yahoo email.
J
[excess quote trimmed by moderator]


Re: Automatic unsubscription ?

 

Here is a first draft of a message dealing with the spam issue.

Spam email is a big issue these days and list servers like Groups.io work hard to avoid being identified as a source of spam. Be aware that if you mark an email message from the group as spam your email program may report this back to your ISP. They in turn send a report to Groups.io, who may automatically unsubscribe you from the list. You will then be sent a message to allow you to resubscribe if you wish. To me this seems like a poor way to handle this issue, but it is a complex topic and I'm not sure what would be a good solution. This policy may change at some point, but until it does don't mark email as spam unless it really is. If you don't wish to read a particular topic just delete the messages or use the "Mute This Topic" link at the bottom of the message. I suppose no real harm will be done if you then resubscribe right away, but it may be annoying and you may wonder what is going on.


Jonathan

On 12/25/2017 9:47 AM, Toby Kraft wrote:
J, could you post an example of what you post in the welcome or monthly letter?? so we can see a succinct explanation of the issue and warning?
Thanks!
Toby


Re: Automatic unsubscription ?

J_Catlady
 

Toby,

Sure, see below. I actually no longer include it in the welcome letter, but I have a set of wiki pages that I call "tips" and which I rotate in and out of the sticky wiki. The one on the spam fiasco is below. When I find it necessary to post this info directly to the group in a message, I usually add something facetious regarding the lack of technical details ("don't even ask" or something like that;). Here's the wiki tip page:

TIP: Marking a Message "Spam" Might Automatically Remove You From the Group. If you mark a message from this group (or any groups.io group) as spam, either intentionally or accidentally via your email's spam filter, the system may automatically remove you from the group. Check your spam folder regularly, and never delete a groups.io message directly from your spam folder (move it to your inbox first). If you are removed, check your inbox for a resubscribe link.
--
J


Re: Automatic unsubscription ?

 

J, could you post an example of what you post in the welcome or monthly letter?? so we can see a succinct explanation of the issue and warning?
Thanks!
Toby


Re: three yahoo-email members started bouncing today

J_Catlady
 

Thanks. I know more than I¡¯d ever want to know about bounce handling. I¡¯m just asking here whether other group owners now have a sudden spate of bouncing by yahoo email.
J

Sent from my iPhone

On Dec 25, 2017, at 5:43 AM, Paul, Ohio, USA via Groups.Io <pwberndt@...> wrote:

Hi J,
The first thing I do with a bounce is send them an email from my personal gmail & Yahoo accounts to see if they bounce. Most of the time, I've found that the member has changed emails or let the email expire/be reclaimed by Yahoo. If they don't bounce, then there is a different problem.
?
Use a subject that won't cause the email to go to spam. With Yahoo being in such turmoil, I wouldn't be surprised that they are losing mail clients &/or accidentally deleting them.
?
Paul, Ohio, USA
Gedmatch A228451, Cousin CGW A428058 & Cousin CSWC A866649
?
[excess quote trimmed by moderator]


Re: three yahoo-email members started bouncing today

 

Hi J,
The first thing I do with a bounce is send them an email from my personal gmail & Yahoo accounts to see if they bounce. Most of the time, I've found that the member has changed emails or let the email expire/be reclaimed by Yahoo. If they don't bounce, then there is a different problem.

Use a subject that won't cause the email to go to spam. With Yahoo being in such turmoil, I wouldn't be surprised that they are losing mail clients &/or accidentally deleting them.

Paul, Ohio, USA
Gedmatch A228451, Cousin CGW A428058 & Cousin CSWC A866649

On Monday, December 25, 2017, 12:46:22 AM EST, J_Catlady <j.olivia.catlady@...> wrote:

Three of my group members started bouncing emails today, and all are using a yahoo email address. Anyone else experiencing this? Mark posted about some general failed deliveries a few days ago, but yahoo wasn't included.
--
J? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ??


three yahoo-email members started bouncing today

J_Catlady
 

Three of my group members started bouncing emails today, and all are using a yahoo email address. Anyone else experiencing this? Mark posted about some general failed deliveries a few days ago, but yahoo wasn't included.
--
J


Re: Deleting pictures in bulk.

 

Shal - excellent summary of the situation.

My personal preference would be for 1b) Action: Consolidate.

Fully automatic deletion runs the risk of all fully automatic things, in that we can't be certain that it's going according to plan; it's little work to do a manual 1b) type delete periodically.

Failing that. I'd go for 1a) delete.

Fully automatic would be my least favourite choice of the three options.

Thanks for all your work on our behalf.

....and Merry Christmas from Wales!

Martin.

***

Judy, Martin, Marv, ...


I've posted my suggestion for handling these signature images to beta@


Shal


Re: Deleting pictures in bulk.

 

Judy, Martin, Marv, ...

My thought was to turn it off, but then I decided against that because
some of our members do post family pictures and I'd hate for them to
lose those photos.
I've posted my suggestion for handling these signature images to beta@


See if any of those ideas make sense to you as a way to handle this problem. Note that although I talk about images that are part of a member's signature, I don't think the proposed mechanism(s) would or could actually make that distinction: any photo posted in a message would be a target.

Shal


Re: Deleting pictures in bulk.

Shadow Grafix
 

My thought was to turn it off, but then I decided against that because some of our members do post family pictures and I'd hate for them to lose those photos.
Judy

----- Original Message -----
From: Shal Farley <shals2nd@...>
Reply-To: <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: 12/23/2017 3:47:04 PM
Subject: Re: [GMF] Deleting pictures in bulk.
________________________________________________________________________________

Judy,

[excess quote trimmed by moderator]

The family photos I'm trying to leave, but I may end up having to turn
off the photos all together.
In what way?

That is, do you plan to check the "Plain Text Only" box in the message
formatting? The other method I can see would be to prohibit attachments.
Or am I missing something?

Shal


Re: Deleting pictures in bulk.

 

Personally, I think this would be the solution to most of our problems with multiple images Shal - identify an unwanted image, do a kind of "select all" on it, delete.

Problem solved!

Martin.



Mark already has a pattern matching list to strip recognized advertisements from messages; that idea might be extended to member signatures. Kind of the opposite of the feature added not too long ago that allows a member to add a signature to his postings.


Shal


Re: Deleting pictures in bulk.

 

Judy,

After reading the initial post about this problem, I went and checked
our photos and there were over 36,000 of them.
Sounds like your group could really use a means to identify signature images and consolidate or delete them. Something like an image search, where you can do a bulk operation on the result. That's what I had in mind for Martin's similar finding.

Would you have any interest in finding and perhaps hiding or removing signature text in the messages archive along with the signature images? Mark already has a pattern matching list that operates across all groups to strip recognized advertisements from messages; that idea might be extended to member signatures. Kind of the opposite of the feature added not too long ago that allows a member to add a signature to his postings.

I spent six hours yesterday deleting garbage.
What consideration(s) motivated that effort?

An obvious possibility is that they make the Emailed Photos album nearly useless - too hard to find the wheat amid all that chaff.

Another I can imagine, with numbers that high, would be a concern with the amount of your storage needlessly consumed. It is fortunate that such images tend to be relatively small files, or the total of them might be non-negligible.

The family photos I'm trying to leave, but I may end up having to turn
off the photos all together.
In what way?

That is, do you plan to check the "Plain Text Only" box in the message formatting? The other method I can see would be to prohibit attachments. Or am I missing something?

Shal


Re: Automatic unsubscription ?

 

Francis,
I think you don't realize that the recipient doesn't even have to mark the a message from the group as spam.? The recipient's email service might actually do this also and the intendended recipient might never see the email.? This is a result of stringent rules that have been put into place to combat actual spam.? Not all Internet Email Providers' crews seem to be well trained in exactly how to implement the rules, which continue to evolve.
--
Bob Bellizzi

The Corneal Dystrophy Foundation


Re: Deleting pictures in bulk.

Shadow Grafix
 

After reading the initial post about this problem, I went and checked our photos and there were over 36,000 of them. I spent six hours yesterday deleting garbage. The family photos I'm trying to leave, but I may end up having to turn off the photos all together. I tried it with just the managers posting photos and that lasted about two seconds before a new graphic showed up.

Merry Christmas all,
Judy

----- Original Message -----
From: Marv Waschke <marv@...>
Reply-To: <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: 12/23/2017 1:43:16 PM
Subject: Re: [GMF] Deleting pictures in bulk.
________________________________________________________________________________

You are right. I was thinking that for our group, simply opting out of automated posting to the photos folder would eliminate the duplication problem before it started. I expect most things that will show up in our photos folder will be inadvertent. I notice that a graphic from a signature has already appeared in our photos folder during minimal testing. From that, I anticipate that tidying up the photos folder will be a daily task. Since our Y! group photos folder is mostly unused, it occurred to me that an opt out flag would be an easy improvement for us, but we can certainly live without it.
Best, Marv


[excess quote trimmed by moderator]


Re: Deleting pictures in bulk.

 

You are right. I was thinking that for our group, simply opting out of automated posting to the photos folder would eliminate the duplication problem before it started. I expect most things that will show up in our photos folder will be inadvertent. I notice that a graphic from a signature has already appeared in our photos folder during minimal testing. From that, I anticipate that tidying up the photos folder will be a daily task. Since our Y! group photos folder is mostly unused, it occurred to me that an opt out flag would be an easy improvement for us, but we can certainly live without it.
Best, Marv

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Shal Farley
Sent: Saturday, December 23, 2017 12:40 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [GMF] Deleting pictures in bulk.

Marv,

> My suggestion is an option in the user profile like "Do not save > graphics in my posts to the group pictures folder."

I saw that in beta@ and may comment on it.

However I'm not sure it addresses Martin's issue, which was primarily with an multitude of copies on an image from a member's message signature.

If I'm understanding correctly his group might value the pictures of book covers, title pages, and other images carried in the body of the messages. So a blanket option to effectively turn off the Emailed Photos album might be too severe a solution.

Notably there's no real cost implied by having the photos from email messages be gathered into the Emailed Photos album - the storage for the photo was necessarily consumed to have the photo remain as part of the message body or attachment in the Messages archive. Putting a reference to them in the Emailed Photos album is simply an convenient way to find and organize them. Except when that album becomes cluttered by an overabundance of copies of the same signature image.

> I don't think your idea is flawed, but it might introduce unneeded > complication and processing.

I'll grant there's some complication in what I proposed, especially in the fully automatic version. Whether that complication is unneeded or not only those who might use it can tell us. I think it would have value in any group that encounters that kind of duplicated image posts, allowing them to be handled gracefully rather than becoming a source of friction between the group member(s) and group admins.

Shal


Re: Deleting pictures in bulk.

 

Marv,

My suggestion is an option in the user profile like "Do not save
graphics in my posts to the group pictures folder."
I saw that in beta@ and may comment on it.

However I'm not sure it addresses Martin's issue, which was primarily with an multitude of copies on an image from a member's message signature.

If I'm understanding correctly his group might value the pictures of book covers, title pages, and other images carried in the body of the messages. So a blanket option to effectively turn off the Emailed Photos album might be too severe a solution.

Notably there's no real cost implied by having the photos from email messages be gathered into the Emailed Photos album - the storage for the photo was necessarily consumed to have the photo remain as part of the message body or attachment in the Messages archive. Putting a reference to them in the Emailed Photos album is simply an convenient way to find and organize them. Except when that album becomes cluttered by an overabundance of copies of the same signature image.

I don't think your idea is flawed, but it might introduce unneeded
complication and processing.
I'll grant there's some complication in what I proposed, especially in the fully automatic version. Whether that complication is unneeded or not only those who might use it can tell us. I think it would have value in any group that encounters that kind of duplicated image posts, allowing them to be handled gracefully rather than becoming a source of friction between the group member(s) and group admins.

Shal


Re: Deleting pictures in bulk.

 

My suggestion is an option in the user profile like "Do not save graphics in my posts to the group pictures folder." For my group, I would like this to be the default, but other groups may be different. I would prefer to have members explicitly upload to the group pictures folder rather than assume that any graphic included in a post should go to the pictures folder.
Generally, I find it better to let individuals designate what they want done rather than automate decisions and make exceptions and mitigations downstream. Most often, I find that approach reduces system processing and avoids tortured logic.
I don't think your idea is flawed, but it might introduce unneeded complication and processing.
Best, Marv

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Shal Farley
Sent: Friday, December 22, 2017 7:25 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [GMF] Deleting pictures in bulk.

Martin,

> One of our list members has a signature as a graphic so every time > they post, the graphic is saved to our group pictures folder - we have > 670 copies so far!

Oops.

So I see two problems here.

> How do I do a bulk delete of pictures? I can do single deletes, but i > won't live long enough to do this 670 times (and counting!!).

That's one of them. We don't have that feature yet.

The other is how to automatically detect such signature images and not store them individually, both to avoid this problem in the Emailed Photos album, and to avoid the related problem of needlessly using up your group's storage quota.

There probably are relatively quick ways to determine if that such an image has already been stored, especially since we don't need (nor want) a "looks like" type of match, an exact match of the image file (and maybe the surrounding text of the signature) will do.

A manual solution would be to have checkbox or button in the Emailed Photos album where you can designate an image as being repeated (as in a signature). The system would go merge all copies into a single stored copy and check future message posts for more of the same.

One question about doing this would be what to do about the "Message"
button that takes you back to the message the image came from. It would likely be ok if that was a link back to the first use. At the other extreme it could bring up a list of all the messages (operating like a kind of search result), but that might be over the top - imagining your case with 670 messages containing the image.

Anyone spot the obvious flaw with this idea, before I post it in beta?

Shal


Re: Deleting pictures in bulk.

 

Martin,

One of our list members has a signature as a graphic so every time
they post, the graphic is saved to our group pictures folder - we have
670 copies so far!
Oops.

So I see two problems here.

How do I do a bulk delete of pictures? I can do single deletes, but i
won't live long enough to do this 670 times (and counting!!).
That's one of them. We don't have that feature yet.

The other is how to automatically detect such signature images and not store them individually, both to avoid this problem in the Emailed Photos album, and to avoid the related problem of needlessly using up your group's storage quota.

There probably are relatively quick ways to determine if that such an image has already been stored, especially since we don't need (nor want) a "looks like" type of match, an exact match of the image file (and maybe the surrounding text of the signature) will do.

A manual solution would be to have checkbox or button in the Emailed Photos album where you can designate an image as being repeated (as in a signature). The system would go merge all copies into a single stored copy and check future message posts for more of the same.

One question about doing this would be what to do about the "Message" button that takes you back to the message the image came from. It would likely be ok if that was a link back to the first use. At the other extreme it could bring up a list of all the messages (operating like a kind of search result), but that might be over the top - imagining your case with 670 messages containing the image.

Anyone spot the obvious flaw with this idea, before I post it in beta?

Shal