开云体育

Since mute isn't an option (and I can kind of see some issues with putting someone on "mute" when dealing with digests), why not just put the rogue person on moderation and just keep an eye on what

Andy . . . wrote: I gave some thought about this. You are correct in some cases where the person I may want to mute is doing something that adversely affects the good atmosphere of a group. That could

Andy, I respectfully disagree with your assessment and the proposal for Mods to ‘police this.’ Mods have enough to do without having to moderate every subtlety of social interaction for every

Just to be abundantly clear, if you change your group from public to private, you cannot change it back again later, Regards Andy

filtering emails will work for those receiving individual messages but it won't remove a persons post from within a digest, whereas a mute person option would mean they weren't in the digest anyway. I

Just an FYI.? The suggestion has been submitted to beta, so additional support there might be worthwhile, https://beta.groups.io/g/main/topic/91985347. Duane -- Lots of detailed information can be

I put in a vote for individual mute. Sometimes a poster simply gets my personal goat. They dwell on a line of argument that I am tired of, or get repetitious in ways that I find personally annoying.

Another thought:? If the same person is posting on behalf of a committee every time, you might put an identifying string in that person's customized sig line.

Hashtags added to the subject line of a reply are included in the email sent out to members but are not added to the topic subject so a search will not pick them up. Regards Andy

Hashtags cannot be used to distinguish the original post from a reply (or replies from each other). You can, however, search on words in the message body. You would have train people to manually put a

Duane . . . What would happen if someone simply added a hashtag to a subject line in a reply to the group? Donald ---------------------------------------------------- Some ham radio groups you may be

My point is that replies need a field or hashtag (searchable) that can be used to view/group replies.

Just to be clear, any messages stored by search engines, like Google, won't be deleted immediately, but they will disappear eventually after they realize they can't get to them any more.? The

More help on privacy: /helpcenter/ownersmanual/1/customizing-group-settings/privacy-settings Frances -- Help available from Groups.io help ( /helpcenter ) and GMF

Go to Admin, Settings. In Privacy, Visibility, choose Private Messages. You can allow your group to be listed in the Groups.io directory - just the name and part of your description.

Can someone please assist me— my message archiving is showing up as public. ? ?Can you give me directions on changing that from public to private?

I know there are all sorts of groups but I really don't understand the desire for the mute of individuals If someone is posting things that others or the moderator does not like, moderate them and

My group would also like the ability to mute other members. We have one member who often posts snarky, provocative comments and people complain about him, but he does not step over the line. I

Sandi . . . In most email programs you can set up email filters and have them route messages meeting certain criteria to a separate folder. Some programs can be set up to delete those instead of

I believe the consensus is that an individual would control who they mute, but would not be able to mute the mod/owner.? I've had a couple of occasions where I'd like to have the feature, but didn't