开云体育

Samuel, I think the best way to "educate" users about a problem such as this one I certainly agree with that, it is what Groups.io already attempts to do. That speaks directly to to Patty's issue. In

I think perhaps the mail providers have become more aggressive classifying emails as spam. Today I started seeing replies to an email chain where I did not receive the first message, even though I was

Michael, My ‘opt-out’ button suggestion is to opt-out of receiving the regular Ah, that's better than what I thought you meant. Still, I'm concerned that those messages would themselves be

Patty, Okay, for fear of getting stomped on, again, since I've been a vocal You still seem to have the cart before the horse: When the email service sends a report to Groups.io, they are *not* saying

I have noticed that when we do this: 1. Upload a file with notification to members. 2. Using the scissors icon, move the file. The link in the email becomes useless and just leads to the general files

I like this approach, perhaps it could be the most workable and successful...

<snip> My ‘opt-out’ button suggestion is to opt-out of receiving the regular Special Notices reminders of “How and Why not to get 'Removed for SPAM’" - it would not be mandatory to choose not

Well thought out and stated, especially a 7 day vs 3 day window. I respect Mark’s mission to try to improve Groups.io’s reputation with ISPs. I actually assumed it might be a new industry mandate

I believe one source of information done well by Professionals (with non-computer savvy language help) is more efficient and likely to be more effective than 1000s of efforts of inconsistent quality.

Although this solves your personal problem and thus makes your own situation easier, the very real effect is that each time a groups.io post is allowed to be classified as spam, it affects groups.io

Okay, for fear of getting stomped on, again, since I've been a vocal proponent of changing this function on Groups.io, here is my experience with my large groups: 1.? I have tried to educate before

We have a group for quilting and sewing and had the same problem. I was directed by helpful members here to use the wiki method and it does work well. It just takes time to learn the best way to do

On Thu, Sep 27, 2018 at 11:24 PM, Michael Pavan wrote: The responsibility to educate individual email List users should not be on individual groups owner, who will not all do so (if at all) in a clear

Hi Here is our travel wiki - the table of contents and a page of links. All links are clickable. There is a link from the table of contents to the topic / page Travel Tools. Lots of other uses for a

This is the best explanation I've ever heard. Even though I'm a group owner I regularly get unsubscribed and couldn't figure out why. Thank you.

I completely agree with Anita. My members are older and have Know NOTHING about mail “folders”. Telling my members they have to monitor their spam or trash folder is RIDICULOUS. This FBL policy is

Thanks for the tips. I've just put a couple of the most abused hashtags on moderation and that seems to have helped. Still would be nice for moderators to limit the number allowed.... Norman * Norman

I think the best way to "educate" users about a problem such as this one is not to try to teach them about the problem beforehand or to try to give a long explanation afterwards, but to lead them in

Michael, Rather than the current ‘If you don’t understand what is not clear to you, That is not a Groups.io policy, of course, just your interpretation of my comments. I suspect Mark would never

I see the problem as being one of insufficient and ineffective education - that’s why I believe it should be done by Groups.io itself, to be done well for a change. Rather than the current ‘If you