开云体育

J is correct here. Messages will not be deleted. In fact, while my archives were being transferred, some members posted new messages, and those fell into the number order of messages being

When I transferred my group, messages on the new group were retained. What was lost was the chronological ordering by message number. So the messages by number started with the new messages on the new

Hi Lena and all, I think a better approach would be to transfer everything and then transfer the last few messages in a batch. I raised a suggestion to that effect on the beta group, but I haven't

Facebook has a huge problem in that you can't go back and find anything. It's not designed for the retention of information. It's designed to be a short-term social media that just comes and is gone.

Is it really true that 'any messages posted to the io group will be erased' in this situation? I was not aware of that and I don't think that's correct. J Sent from my iPhone

Yes, you can ask to transfer the member list only. But every member will get a message about the transfer. If you later ask for Messages to be transferred, any messages posted to the .io group will be

Am considering changing from Yahoo groups to Facebook assuming it encompasses all that Yahoo offers (having trouble with "files"). ?Any advice? Also anyone know anything about ?new Yahoo corporate

Obviously the Verizon/Yahoo deal has now scared me into action. I have secured my groups name in IO. I want to secure all of the member email addresses from YahooGroups BUT not yet go live with the IO

Thanks, Duane. I hope it's very high on the list. :) J

They're not logged, only sent to you if you use Bcc: It's been discussed in several threads on beta@ and is on the TODO list. It will probably come as part of the Notifications Overhaul, but may be

Does anyone know where a "send message" owner message to a group member is logged? A couple of them I sent yesterday are not in "owner messages," they're not in the group message activity or moderator

Noel, I meant public in the stricter sense that anyone can read the messages, without joining. I don't know whether the DMCA (or a lawyer arguing about it) considers those effectively the same. Which

Noel . . . <n.leaver@...> wrote: I wonder what he will think when you shut down the Yahoo group (turn off posting for regular members)? Will you lose him or will he migrate to the new

Our group also would love to be able to monitor what certain members upload. Most members get that we are paying for space but others upload far too many useless (to us) photos. We get around that in

applies; but that's a subtlety where a lawyer might have a field day. Our group is public, in that anyone can join and read messages. messages after the transfer. Or if there's too many of them

the transfer, perhaps without advance notice, then make the announcement in the Yahoo group and shut off all posting and make it announcement only right away. We have already moved the group without

is on the to-do list: While I agree full moderation of loading photos is an enhancement not a bug, I think that in its absence it the correct behaviour is to prevent moderated users from loading

Noel, I don't think it is so much a bug as something that hasn't been done. It is on the to-do list:

Donald, I was thinking of that even as I wrote my message. The only reason I hesitate is that there were (thankfully few) cases reported in the Yahoo mod groups of a moderator being either confused or

Hi Shal and Sarah, There is a minor glitch in that the downloaded messages do not contain their message numbers in an obvious way. However, in the worst case there is a simple URL that allows someone