开云体育

Yes, what you have written is more accurate. I have selected "Only Moderators Can Create Hashtags". The setting means that posts can be tagged only with existing hashtags, but there have not been any

p.s. Also, many of our group members come from another group where hashtags are required. I think the other group may have gotten them into bad habits. In our group, hashtags are (were) NOT required.

The reason in my case is that at least 50% of the time, members are misusing the tags in terms of matching the tag with the subject matter of the post. This ranges from mismatch no connection

J wrote: Although J prompted me to ask, the questions that follow are open to anyone who wishes to eliminate or restrict the use of hashtags in their group(s). And of course, anyone wishing to weigh

Re my prior post questioning the ability to do this (which has not yet posted), I now see that you can go through individually and set each hashtag to "only moderators can use this tag." So I've now

What do you mean? How can you turn them off? I've already set mine to only allow moderators to create them. But I don't think you can turn them off entirely, unless I'm missing something. J

J - Good question. Like Shal, I couldn't figure a need for them in my groups so I've left them turned off. I was concerned that it would just add confusion for the group members, since they've not

J's reply to Duane moved here: Why use hashtags in a group? ( /g/GroupManagersForum/message/1685 ) Shal GMF Owner

J, If you're talking about using "Edit Topic" item from the More menu on a message in the archive, then I think you can edit the Subject freely and it will affect the whole topic (thread) without

J, Hashtags may not be useful in every type of group. For example, I haven't been encouraging their use here in GMF because I haven't really worked out how to get value from them. Hypothetically I can

[mod note: originally posted as a reply to Duane's message here ( /g/GroupManagersForum/message/1684 ) .] Thanks, Duane. I'm going to remove the tag in question and hope for the best.

I've done it in the past, though not recently, and later replies went to the same thread. Duane

I just did a test in my test group, and it seems that removing the tag didn't affect the title. At least, it did not create two separate threads when I afterwards responded via email to the thread

LeeAnne, That's ok. There's nothing really new here, but it does provide confirming evidence that the message really was sent by someone using the member's AOL account. This was an authentication test

Will removing a hashtag change the actual thread title? I want to remove an erroneous hashtag from someone's thread but don't want to split the thread, which would result if I change the actual title.

LeeAnne, Well, no. Had this been a legit message those links would have gone to a page at Google where you could view or download a file that had been put there. In this case who knows, and unless

My apologies Shal! ?I didn't realize you needed the whole thing: Return-Path: <//////////@aol.com> X-Sender: //////////@aol.com X-Apparently-To: equinecushings@... X-Received: [boring]

I mentioned it because I am pretty sure it did have (or least wanted to have?) an attachment. ?Here is a copy of the actual message on line. If I mouse over the red download link (red arrow) it makes

Deborah and I have added a section on subgroups to the wiki. Great joint volunteer effort! Frances

LeeAnne, I'm not sure why you mentioned this. Did the message have an attachment? Either way, I wouldn't touch it or any of the links in the message. Shal