开云体育

Yes, members can still see them, but they will not be able to start topics with them (or reply to topics with them if you have Replies by Mods Only checked also). Andy

I set these type hashtags to mods only.? After that's done will non mods still seem them? Thx

Nina, That checkbox does NOT control whether or not Groups.io sends back to you messages that you posted. Rather, it does exactly one thing: when checked it causes Groups.io to replace the Message-ID

Mahendra Bakshi wrote: The first Groups.io group I joined (before I knew what it was) was created by an author so people could follow his book publications and public appearances. When that author

I took a different angle on this one.? I did set it for "Use by Mods Only", but I also set it to be Locked immediately, so any email replies will get bounced.? Keeps people from getting the false

Thanks Chris. This is very good to know, especially for such hashtags as #poll/#file/#chat-notice. In particular, if you were to set #poll-notice to both "use by Mods only" and "replies by Mods only,"

Thank you.? I think I'll set them all to "Use by Mods Only" and keep an eye on them in case there are exceptions.? Many of them I had already set as moderated, so I could catch them, but this will

I've done some more tests (without my sanity failing!) and found that if a system hashtag is set to mods only and then a non - moderator does something (create an album, upload a photo, etc) that

Hi Don, I couldn’t agree more. At the same time, though, what harm is done if a founder/owner create a short list of those, who in their opinion, by participation, knowledge, history and temperament

In an effort to reduce the number of hashtags in the drop down list, and somewhat restrict usage by members, I've set some of them to "Use by Mods Only".? So far, it looks like this will accomplish

What happens to the group when no other member wants to take over the group? I have found in maybe 15 years of ownership of my group that I inherited, finding someone to just help in being a moderator

Obviously there is frequently a concensus on any topic discussed here; I see olittle or no evidence of "groupthink". (My italics above) That sounds very much like an accusation that the GMF is neither

Correct, although it may apply to other providers as well. I have this box unchecked in my account preferences and I still receive my own messages to groups. Bruce Check out the groups.io Help Center

To the best of my knowledge, this only applies to those that have gmail addresses.? It was created because of the way gmail tries to 'hide' a person's own emails. Duane -- The official Groups.io user

Mark has nothing to do with GMF, other than his company hosting it.? The group was created by Shal with the intent of assisting group owners and moderators.? GMF and Group_Help are unofficial groups

As Bruce mentioned, there's not a subscription setting to control this for individual groups; however, there is an account-wide setting that controls it for all the groups someone belongs to. The

Hi Bruce, I agree that we’re focusing on the wrong thing. In my opinion, the “active leadership within GMF is not ALL group owner/founders functioning as equal peers, but a very limited number of

Robin -- There is nothing within groups.io's subscription settings that will allow someone to do this. The best option is probably a mail filter on one's own email client, one that sends anything

Naming a successor doesn't really fix the problem, all it does is slightly alter/delay the inevitable argument over when the rules of succession kick in. Does someone have to present a death

Hi Jan, Dwayne As I have said here before, the obvious “solution” is to permit single owners to designate a “successor” (in waiting) who has NO authority thus conveyed UNTIL the untimely