开云体育

The general term I would prefer is "Admin" since they administrate various features. Best, Glenn

The definition of “Moderate” includes "limited in scope or effect”. “Moderator" is not inappropriate, as speech (actually message posting) is not the only function that can be moderated.

This inquiry was actually in response to my making the calendar subscriber editable and our Vice-Chair making that exact same criticism.? I personally don't think that's a problem, but was looking

Yep.? Charles Reid and I are on the same page in that request as noted downthread, the generalization to other features besides calendar.? IMHO, more granular is always better because you can

I get what you are saying, Bob, but our use case is somewhat different in that the Eboard wants to edit a calendar that is visible by the members. Best, Glenn

Glenn, There's this suggestion, which includes the idea of a merged calendar which aggregates events from the primary and subgroups. That might solve a couple of the problems with using a subgroup

We simply set up a basic free group just for this purpose.? That way there is no confusion when posting. Also, if you need more subdivision you can? do it in the separate Executive group and

I cannot claim that this suggestion is anything "brilliant", but would making your Calendar editable by subscribers work? Or would it be too vulnerable to mistakes and inadvertent deletions? Chris

Thanks, I now understand the e-mail "command", but shouldn't I receive a copy if I, a moderator, add the moderator's link to CC or BCC or is that not implemented in the "command" action? Ken "For all

Oh.? Yeah, that would be a deal-breaker for us. Will think some more on this and report back if I come up with something brilliant. Best, Glenn

Glenn, I wrote: Oops. I missed a gaping flaw with that idea: members of the primary group could not receive notices or reminders from the subgroup's calendar. Shal -- Help:

No, this is not currently possible. I feel that the title of "Moderator" is somewhat unfortunate. In groups.io, individual Moderator roles and notifications are highly configurable and -- if you want

On 7/1/2018 12:23, Shal Farley wrote: > Glenn, > > > Since "moderators" isn't appropriate, I would like to create a new > > role called "Executive Board" or "EBoard", assign members to that role > >

Glenn, There's no feature to create new roles, but you might be able to get the effect you want by using a subgroup for the Executive Board. The calendar of the Executive Board subgroup can be set to

In the strictest sense you aren't "sending an email"; you are sending a command to Groups.io to reject a post. Similarly an ("email") command sent to release a post to the members cannot be used to

Moderators is inappropriate because, wait for it, they don't moderate and the even the implication that the speech of our members is moderated is against the culture of the group.? And I can see use

To reject a post, I'm pretty sure that would be +reject instead of +delete.? Delete just tosses the post in the bit bucket with no action taken. Duane -- Help: /static/help GMF's

Why is "moderators" inappropriate? Seems like a lot of work (for Mark) just to avoid using the word "moderator". You could always make them (co)owners... Chris

Jim, True, but that's more an argument for more documentation than an argument against using distinct punctuation. Note that we're talking about a small use case: where someone copied or screen-shot

Hi, all. On our committee list, we do not do any moderation at all.? However, some members should have more power over the other features (specifically calendar) than others. Since "moderators" isn't