If the legally required information?is expressed concisely in a footer, similar (to but not exactly the same as) the footer that appears at the bottom of this message, then the narrative part could be anything the Owner wishes.
On Tue, Jun 13, 2023 at 4:33?PM Greg D <ko6th.greg@...> wrote:
I expect it's a matter of legal risk avoidance.? Depending on
jurisdiction, Groups.io could be held responsible for the legal text,
which they cannot control unless they force its inclusion. Alternatively
they could require a legal review of everyone's submitted text, which
would be cost prohibitive.? Yay, 21's century...
Forcing the specific legal text to be included in a footer or such
probably meets the requirement, so to me this would be a viable
alternative.? Probably a matter for discussion on the Beta forum.
Greg
Peter S. Shenkin wrote:
> But I don't see why official?wording is needed at all, just as long as
> the required information is present. And as I said, all the officially
> required boilerplate could concisely be put in a required footer and
> the user's desired message could then replace the official text entirely.