From: "Barb" <barb1283@...>
Has anyone read her books and think they are
worth purchasing?
If money's not an issue. I've seen her speak and am familiar w/her
work. She's greatly inspiring, but in addition to being very dogmatic,
she seems to use a 1-dimensional, extreme approach that, in my
opinion, is suitable only for a small minority of cancer patients. I
believe the informational contents in her products can be obtained
elsewhere for free. I THINK the primary components of her approach are
juicing and raw fruit-vegetable diet (the barebones of Gerson
therapy).
She said traditional cancer treatment is like
blowing up a house with a bomb in order to kill
the roaches in it. Roaches are gone but so is
house.
Yes, and that's how she typically speaks, and thinks, from what I've
seen.
From: "leedsman1954" <leedsman1954@...>
--- In FlaxSeedOil2@..., <catherinecoy@c...> wrote:
Nothing is very flattering about alternative medicine on
Quackwatch. Quackwatch is simply the PR tool of Cancer, Inc.
I couldn't agree more
I agree that Quackwatch is very anti-alternative but that doesn't
mean that everything on there is wrong! (And I am not passing any
judgement either way re. Dr.Day). I think that the pro-alternative
camp can be just as biased the other way.
Very true.
