¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

ctrl + shift + ? for shortcuts
© 2025 Groups.io

[pr-writers] A letter in the Gleaner today


 

Nothing in there about elected judges, just an elected Senate.

On Sat, 4 Nov 2023 at 17:05, E Lee <sootfive48@...> wrote:
DISAGREE 100% - SOUNDS LIKE US POLITICS TO ME ELECTED JUDGES, ELECTED SENATORS - IF WE DO NOT TRUST OUR GOVERNMENT TO PUT IN GOOD PEOPLE IN THE SENATE & IF WE DO NOT TRUST OUR LAW SCHOOLS TO HAVE JUDGES COMPETENT TO DELIVER JUSTICE THEN WE SHOULD SHUT OURSELVES DOWN!!!? THIS WAS HARPER'S DREAM THE AMERICA CANADA WAY!! THIS IS WHY WE ARE IN SUCH A MESS RIGHT NOW.? HARPER DESPISED ANYTHING CANADIAN IN CASE ANYONE NOTICE.? HE MADE IT BLATANTLY CLEAR IN INTERVIEWS HE PREFERRED THE US WAY.??
Lovely Living Here!

Elizabeth Lee
.Box 871
St Anthony, Newfoundland & Labrador, Canada Beothuk Territory
A0K 4S0
780-838-0872


On Sat, Nov 4, 2023 at 4:08?PM Vivian <vivian.unger@...> wrote:
Hi,

Saw a letter in the F'ton Gleaner today, calling for an elected Senate in Canada. I've attached a photo of it, but it's small and hard to read, so I've OCRed it and included the text below (with [sic] inserted next to the errors, and yeah, there were two in one letter, not a testament to the editorship of the paper).

I think an elected Senate makes a lot of sense, but not with FPTP, please! What a wasted opportunity that would be. The Senators should be elected with PR-STV. This is, after all, how Australia elects its Senate.

Does anyone want to write a letter to the Gleaner? Maybe I'll do it if no one else wants to, although I'm a bit preoccupied with NaNoWriMo lately.

Vivian

Featured letter
Some suggestions for an elected Senate

I agree partly with the third last paragraph Of the Nov. 1 editorial, "PM's Senate picks rightly in doubt," which suggests that senators should be elected. But I disagree with most of the rest of the editorial.

I do not want some hack bean counter deciding what is best. Each province should have four senators, each elected for six years. Every three years, two of the four senators would be elected, followed three years later by the other two senators.

Senators' elections would be part of a general election every three years. Each senator and candidate would be eligible for election until their 70th birthday. Each senator would be renumerated[sic] at 1.75 times the average salary paid in Canada as posted yearly by Statistics Canada.

They would have to complete more than 110 hours each month of direct parliamentary duties; less than that would result in a 50 per cent pay cut for the month.
A majority vote of the Senate should be needed to appoint federal judges. Any bill presented to the Senate and returned three times to the House of Commons without approval would be dead.

Amending the Constitution should require approval of 70 per cent[sic] of senators.

Members of Parliament should also be elected to six-year terms, with elections for half of the House every three years. If a senator or MP can't complete a six-year term, the legislators of the home province I would select a replacement for the remainder of the term.

General elections for the House of Commons and Senate should be held every three years and a government that loses the confidence of the House should relinquish power within 10 days.

The king of a foreign country should not have a word to say on how Canada is run. Canadian voters have the responsibility and duty to decide how our country is run.?

Robert LeBlanc



--
Vivian Unger
Fredericton, NB, Canada
On the unceded territory of the Wolastoqiyik and ²Ñ¾±¡¯°ì³¾²¹¡¯°ì¾±

. .

BOOK INDEXING SERVICES

FICTION