I understand what you are telling me.? I manually corrected the? 2? 80M? calls? ? (each one had multiple QSO entries all "EU" to "NA"
?
I'm stumped on W1AW/4 back in 2014 for the Centennial Award.? Worked this call 49 times for SSB, RTTY and CW.? ?28 times the country was EU and 21 times NA, now that I am aware of the log entries in this regard.? DXCCPrefix on all QSO's was "K"? and? DXCCID on all QSO's is 291.? I don't understand where or why the "CONT" field would switch back and forth between "EU" and "NA".? Only the QTH of the station in the US changed.
I never would have noticed this before?? All the calls from W1,2,3,5,6,7,8,9,0,KH2,KH8,KH0,KP4 in the Centennial Award were all correct, checking just now.? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?Kinda mute at this point for the above award.
Quess my question is: how does the "CONT" field calculate?
+ A QSO's Continent item can be set in several ways, depending upon how you had DXKeeper configured at the time: by your directly specifying it, from a callbook lookup, from an override, or from a previously-logged QSO with the same callsign.
+ Did you originally log the QSO with DXKeeper in 2014?
I did a clean up duplicate files on my DXLab computer and removed a lot of the DX Lab files.. I reinstalled the DXLab Suite and then did a update, but not every thing has come back.
When I run a Recompute Actions report -- All my qso are listed as the "Broken: ARRL Section ___ is inconsistent with DXCC Entity K and
State ___ and County ___,______ . I checked and all the US States have been changed as well as the County..
It appears Call, Date, band. Mode, DXCC ID (all 291) DXCC (All United States.
I having another problem, but I will submit it after I get this resolved.. Thanks Dan KX7DX
I understand what you are telling me.? I manually corrected the? 2? 80M? calls? ? (each one had multiple QSO entries all "EU" to "NA"
?
I'm stumped on W1AW/4 back in 2014 for the Centennial Award.? Worked this call 49 times for SSB, RTTY and CW.? ?28 times the country was EU and 21 times NA, now that I am aware of the log entries in this regard.? DXCCPrefix on all QSO's was "K"? and? DXCCID on all QSO's is 291.? I don't understand where or why the "CONT" field would switch back and forth between "EU" and "NA".? Only the QTH of the station in the US changed.
I never would have noticed this before?? All the calls from W1,2,3,5,6,7,8,9,0,KH2,KH8,KH0,KP4 in the Centennial Award were all correct, checking just now.? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?Kinda mute at this point for the above award.
Quess my question is: how does the "CONT" field calculate?
I was looking at my WAC from 1987. And from there was wondering if I was close to 5B WAC, after all these years?
I followed the suggestions in this post. DxKeeper Check Progress..........Then Configuration/Awards/I checked: Include eQSL.............(and all the DXCC Bands and Modes are checked)
Then saw your scripts button at the bottom of the Check Progress page and double clicked on 5BWAC.
From there, 10M, 15M, and 20M look fine.
But 40M has a W1AW/4 RTTY CONTACT back in 2014 as "EU"
+ Correct the erroneous Continent item specified in this logged QSO.
80M has a FT8 CONTACT back in 2017 XE2YWB as AS
+ Correct the erroneous Continent item specified in this logged QSO.
TG9ANF FT8 CONTACT back in 2018 as "EU"
+ Correct the erroneous Continent item specified in this logged QSO.
So was wondering if I missed part of the procedure?
+ All progress reports generated by DXKeeper are dependent on the accuracy of the information logged in each QSO. After you correct the errors you report above, try running the 5BWAC script again.
Yes I have subscribed for years and it used to
work but somewhere along the line of updates, etc,. something
changed and I'll be damned if I can find it.
tnx for the reply Dave ... 73 Dwight NS9I
On 4/18/2025 6:40 PM, Dave AA6YQ via
groups.io wrote:
On Thu, Apr 17, 2025 at 10:25 PM, Joe Subich, W4TV <lists@...> wrote:
> So, another guess. Is confirmed cards cards that I've received and
> verified cards cards I had a card checker check and the ARRL granted
> credit for the checked cards?
Yes, "Confirmed" is cards (or LotW credits) you have received.
Verified is credits that have been awarded by ARRL based on a
DXCC (or WAS, VUCC, etc. as applicable) application.
> The summary sections? Please explain.
What I call the "summery" sections are the bottom rows of the
progress report ... "Includes deleted entities" and "Non-deleted
(current) entities only"
73,
... Joe, W4TV
On 2025-04-17 10:39 PM, Stan Gammons via groups.io wrote:
> Hi Joe,
>
> On 4/17/25 21:12, Joe Subich, W4TV wrote:
>> On 2025-04-17 9:46 PM, Stan Gammons via groups.io wrote:
>> > I was wondering what the Card column in the DXCC progress report
>> > denotes?
>>
>> Is confirmed (Y) or verified (V - credit granted by ARRL) by card.
>
> So, another guess.? Is confirmed cards cards that I've received and
> verified cards cards I had a card checker check and the ARRL granted
> credit for the checked cards?
>
>>
>> In the summary sections "Card" indicates the number of countries
>> confirmed/verified by card and "LotW" indicates the number of
>> countries confirmed/verified by LotW credits.
>
> The summary sections?? Please explain.
>
>
> 73
>
> Stan
> KM4HQE
>
>
*UNCHECK* "Upload QSOs whose callsigns begin with !" (last line in the"options" box at the top of the tab)
73,
... Joe, W4TV
On 2025-04-18 3:16 AM, Mark N7YD wrote:
Ok. This solves another thing for me. In years past, when we all kept paper
logs, we were asked to record station changes and other information in our logbook. It would go in the log as a comment with none of the QSO information filled in. I had been trying to figure out how to do that for any information I wanted to record in the DXKeeper log. I hadn¡¯t yet gotten into mind how to make the feature request¡
And now I know it isn¡¯t necessary as the support is already there.
However, I just ran into an issue. It appears that logging a comment like this
still tries to upload the ¡°QSO¡± to QRZ and possibly other logging/QSL services. I got a couple of popups from QRZ, and both the eQSL and LoTW panels are showing ¡°R¡± for Sent. I would guess that a QSO with a ¡°!¡± in the callsign should probably prevent the record from being uploaded to those services. Just a guess, however. ?
Thanks for taking a look at this.
73 -.. . / -- .- .-. -.- / -. --... -.-- -.. DE MARK N7YD
Sent: Thursday, April 17, 2025 10:27 To: [email protected] Subject: [DXLab] !
+ AA6YQ comments beloew Dave's DXKeeper manual (Logging New QSOs with the Capture window) says:
If the first letter of the callsign you enter is an exclamation point, DXKeeper
assumes that you are logging a CQ, an unsuccessful call, a test, or some other transmission that you wish to record but does not represent a QSO. Such log entries are not assigned a DXCC prefix, do not initiate a Callbook database lookup, and are not included in award tracking statistics.
+ Exactly right. Click the Capture window's Begin button when you start
calling CQ; when you stop calling CQ, click the Capture window's End button and log the CQ. When calling a station, initially place a ! in front of the callsign of the station you're calling (in the Capture window's Callsign box), and click the Begin button. If the station responds, remove the !. If not, log the unsuccessful call.
*UNCHECK* "Upload QSOs whose callsigns begin with !" (last line in the"options" box at the top of the tab)
73,
... Joe, W4TV
On 2025-04-18 3:16 AM, Mark N7YD wrote:
Ok. This solves another thing for me. In years past, when we all kept paper logs, we were asked to record station changes and other information in our logbook. It would go in the log as a comment with none of the QSO information filled in. I had been trying to figure out how to do that for any information I wanted to record in the DXKeeper log. I hadn¡¯t yet gotten into mind how to make the feature request¡ And now I know it isn¡¯t necessary as the support is already there. However, I just ran into an issue. It appears that logging a comment like this still tries to upload the ¡°QSO¡± to QRZ and possibly other logging/QSL services. I got a couple of popups from QRZ, and both the eQSL and LoTW panels are showing ¡°R¡± for Sent. I would guess that a QSO with a ¡°!¡± in the callsign should probably prevent the record from being uploaded to those services. Just a guess, however. ? Thanks for taking a look at this. 73 -.. . / -- .- .-. -.- / -. --... -.-- -.. DE MARK N7YD From: [email protected] <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Dave AA6YQ via groups.io Sent: Thursday, April 17, 2025 10:27 To: [email protected] Subject: [DXLab] ! + AA6YQ comments beloew Dave's DXKeeper manual (Logging New QSOs with the Capture window) says: If the first letter of the callsign you enter is an exclamation point, DXKeeper assumes that you are logging a CQ, an unsuccessful call, a test, or some other transmission that you wish to record but does not represent a QSO. Such log entries are not assigned a DXCC prefix, do not initiate a Callbook database lookup, and are not included in award tracking statistics. + Exactly right. Click the Capture window's Begin button when you start calling CQ; when you stop calling CQ, click the Capture window's End button and log the CQ. When calling a station, initially place a ! in front of the callsign of the station you're calling (in the Capture window's Callsign box), and click the Begin button. If the station responds, remove the !. If not, log the unsuccessful call. 73, Dave, AA6YQ
Ok.? This solves another thing for me.? In years past, when we all kept paper logs, we were asked to record station changes and other information in our logbook.? It would go in the log as a comment with none
of the QSO information filled in.? I had been trying to figure out how to do that for any information I wanted to record in the DXKeeper log.? I hadn¡¯t yet gotten into mind how to make the feature request¡
?
And now I know it isn¡¯t necessary as the support is already there.
?
However, I just ran into an issue.? It appears that logging a comment like this still tries to upload the ¡°QSO¡± to QRZ and possibly other logging/QSL services.? I got a couple of popups from QRZ, and both
the eQSL and LoTW panels are showing ¡°R¡± for Sent.? I would guess that a QSO with a ¡°!¡± in the callsign should probably prevent the record from being uploaded to those services.? Just a guess, however.?
?
Dave's DXKeeper manual (Logging New QSOs with the Capture window) says:
If the first letter of the callsign you enter is an exclamation point, DXKeeper assumes that you are logging a CQ, an unsuccessful call, a test, or some other transmission that you wish to record but does not represent
a QSO. Such log entries are not assigned a DXCC prefix, do not initiate a Callbook database lookup, and are not included in award tracking statistics.
+ Exactly right. Click the Capture window's Begin button when you start calling CQ; when you stop calling CQ, click the Capture window's End button and log the CQ. When calling a station, initially place a ! in front of the callsign of
the station you're calling (in the Capture window's Callsign box), and click the Begin button. If the station responds, remove the !. If not, log the unsuccessful call.?
So, another guess. Is confirmed cards cards that I've received and verified cards cards I had a card checker check and the ARRL granted credit for the checked cards?
Yes, "Confirmed" is cards (or LotW credits) you have received. Verified is credits that have been awarded by ARRL based on a DXCC (or WAS, VUCC, etc. as applicable) application.
The summary sections? Please explain.
What I call the "summery" sections are the bottom rows of the progress report ... "Includes deleted entities" and "Non-deleted (current) entities only"
73,
... Joe, W4TV
On 2025-04-17 10:39 PM, Stan Gammons via groups.io wrote:
Hi Joe, On 4/17/25 21:12, Joe Subich, W4TV wrote:
On 2025-04-17 9:46 PM, Stan Gammons via groups.io wrote: > I was wondering what the Card column in the DXCC progress report > denotes?
Is confirmed (Y) or verified (V - credit granted by ARRL) by card.
So, another guess.? Is confirmed cards cards that I've received and verified cards cards I had a card checker check and the ARRL granted credit for the checked cards?
In the summary sections "Card" indicates the number of countries confirmed/verified by card and "LotW" indicates the number of countries confirmed/verified by LotW credits.
The summary sections?? Please explain. 73 Stan KM4HQE
On 2025-04-17 9:46 PM, Stan Gammons via groups.io wrote: > I was wondering what the Card column in the DXCC progress report > denotes?
Is confirmed (Y) or verified (V - credit granted by ARRL) by card.
So, another guess.? Is confirmed cards cards that I've received and verified cards cards I had a card checker check and the ARRL granted credit for the checked cards?
+ A 'Y' in the Cards column denotes "confirmed via QSL card"
+ A 'V' in the Cards column denotes "DXCC award credit granted to a QSL card confirmation. A card checker checking a card is QSL card often - but not always - the first step towards received DXCC award credit for that card. For example, when I'm applying for DXCC award credits, I send QSL cards to the ARRL DXCC Desk via registered mail.
In the summary sections "Card" indicates the number of countries confirmed/verified by card and "LotW" indicates the number of countries confirmed/verified by LotW credits.
The summary sections?? Please explain.
+ Joe is referring the two 3-line sections at the end of the DXCC Progress report: one labeled "Includes deleted entities",? and the other labeled "Non-deleted entities only"; both sections include Card and LoTW columns.
On 2025-04-17 9:46 PM, Stan Gammons via groups.io wrote: > I was wondering what the Card column in the DXCC progress report > denotes?
Is confirmed (Y) or verified (V - credit granted by ARRL) by card.
So, another guess.? Is confirmed cards cards that I've received and verified cards cards I had a card checker check and the ARRL granted credit for the checked cards?
In the summary sections "Card" indicates the number of countries confirmed/verified by card and "LotW" indicates the number of countries confirmed/verified by LotW credits.
On 2025-04-17 9:46 PM, Stan Gammons via groups.io wrote:
I was wondering what the Card column in the DXCC progress report denotes?
Is confirmed (Y) or verified (V - credit granted by ARRL) by card.
Similarly in the LotW column, Y = confirmed, V = verified.
In the summary sections "Card" indicates the number of countries confirmed/verified by card and "LotW" indicates the number of countries confirmed/verified by LotW credits.
73,
... Joe, W4TV
On 2025-04-17 9:46 PM, Stan Gammons via groups.io wrote:
I was wondering what the Card column in the DXCC progress report denotes?? Perhaps I overlooked it on this page In my report it shows 191 confirmed and 40 verified. 73 Stan KM4HQE