开云体育

ctrl + shift + ? for shortcuts
© 2025 Groups.io
  1. DXLab
  2. Messages
Expanded Topics Messages Polls
Date
Re: LoTW status error?

 

+ AA6YQ comments below
You *CAN NOT* eliminate the error since you removed the questionable
QSO from DXKeeper. LotW does not allow users to remove QSOs once
uploaded.
+ You can eliminate the error in one of two ways:

1. Restore the QSO to your log so that it will "match" what LoTW reports when you invoke "Update from LoTW"; if the QSO didn't actually happen, set its "QSL Rcvd" item to 'I' so that it won't be considered for award progress.

+ or

2. Uncheck the "Report unmatched QSOs and QSLs as errors" on the "QSL Configuration" window's LoTW.

+ I recommend #1 so that you can keep "Report unmatched QSOs and QSLs as errors" checked

? ? ? ?73,

? ? ? ? ? ? Dave, AA6YQ
Re: Populating maps with log data?

 

+ AA6YQ comments below
Thank You, Dave.? I knew it had to be there, but just had not found it yet.? Lots to read and understand!? Grin.
+ As suggested here



+ slowly scan the Reference Documentation of each DXLab applications that you are using. Ignore the details, just create a list of those "functions" that you're interested in understanding and potentially using. Then pursue each of those functions one at a time, consulting the Reference Documentation for details and the "goal-oriented documentation" for step-by-step instructions; searching its index with a few key words is a good way to locate what you're seeking:



+ You can always ask for help here. No one will criticize you for asking a question that has already been asked and answered, or whose answer is obvious somewhere in the documentation.

? ? ? ? 73,

? ? ? ? ? ? ? Dave, AA6YQ
Re: LoTW status error?

 

On 2025-03-20 7:24 PM, David Reed via groups.io wrote:

What do I need to do to eliminate that error? I assume somehow remove
it from LoTW, but how?
You *CAN NOT* eliminate the error since you removed the questionable
QSO from DXKeeper. LotW does not allow users to remove QSOs once
uploaded.

73,

... Joe, W4TV


On 2025-03-20 7:24 PM, David Reed via groups.io wrote:
Somehow, if there was a reply, I missed it; any clues r things I might try would be appreciated!
On 3/18/2025 10:16 PM, David Reed via groups.io wrote:

I received the following resposnse from LoTW after giving it a *Sync LoTW QSOs button* press:

??????? Date????? Time?????????? Call Band????????? Mode Submode?????? Station Call??? Result

? 2025-03-18? 02:42:06????????? 6Y7EI???? 80M FT8???????????????????????????? W5SV??? Error: no matching QSO in log

LotW Sync QSLs: 1 QSL processed, 0 log entries updated, 1 error
I checked the log, and that QSO was in doubt, and I had confirmed a QSO with that station about 7 hours later, so I deleted the corresponding entry in DXKeeper.

However, I still get the same error now.

What do I need to do to eliminate that error? I assume somehow remove it from LoTW, but how?

Thanks in advance & 73 de Dave, W5SV
Re: LoTW status error?

 

+ AA6YQ comments below
Somehow, if there was a reply, I missed it; any clues r things I might try would be appreciated!
+ My response is here:

/g/DXLab/message/228410

? ? ?73,

? ? ? ? ?Dave, AA6YQ
Re: LoTW status error?

 

开云体育

Somehow, if there was a reply, I missed it; any clues r things I might try would be appreciated!

On 3/18/2025 10:16 PM, David Reed via groups.io wrote:

I received the following resposnse from LoTW after giving it a Sync LoTW QSOs button press:

??????? Date????? Time?????????? Call??? Band????????? Mode?????? Submode?????? Station Call??? Result

? 2025-03-18? 02:42:06????????? 6Y7EI???? 80M?????????? FT8???????????????????????????? W5SV??? Error: no matching QSO in log

LotW Sync QSLs: 1 QSL processed, 0 log entries updated, 1 error

I checked the log, and that QSO was in doubt, and I had confirmed a QSO with that station about 7 hours later, so I deleted the corresponding entry in DXKeeper.

However, I still get the same error now.

What do I need to do to eliminate that error? I assume somehow remove it from LoTW, but how?

Thanks in advance & 73 de Dave, W5SV
Re: Populating maps with log data?

 

Thank You, Dave.? I knew it had to be there, but just had not found it yet.? Lots to read and understand!? Grin.

Rich, NU6T

On Thu, Mar 20, 2025 at 3:09?PM Dave AA6YQ via <aa6yq=[email protected]> wrote:
+ AA6YQ comments below
Is there a way to populate one of the DXLab maps with log records?? I am wondering whether worked or confirmed DXCC entities or zones can be illustrated on associated maps.? I have DX Atlas.
+ Yes. See



+ and



+ and



? ? ?73,

? ? ? ? ? Dave, AA6YQ



--
Richard Hill
Re: IC-PW1 configuration in DXLabCommander

 

+ AA6YQ comments below
I'm sorry.
I did not know that [email protected] could not send attachments.
+ No problem, Shige!
?
PC(DXLabCommander):USB A port?[USB cable]?IC-7600:USB B port
PC(DXLabCommander):USB A port?CT-18(interface)?[REMOTE cable]?IC-PW1:Remote socket
IC-7600:ACC-2 socket?[ACC cable]?IC-PW1:ACC-1 socket
?
Does this tell you the status of the connection between my radio and my PC?
The PC, IC-7600, and IC-PW1 are connected like this.
In this state, IC-PW1 cannot be controlled well
+ That configuration is not supported because it does not prevent the PW1 from encountering CI-V bus collisions, which can mangle frequency packets and cause the PW1 to transmit on an unexpected frequency.? Dave W6DE will help you establish the correct connectivity and configure Commander appropriately.

? ? ? ?73,

? ? ? ? ? ?Dave, AA6YQ
Re: IC-PW1 configuration in DXLabCommander

 

开云体育

?Joe, W6TV, Dave AA6YQ, and Dave, W6DE

I'm sorry.
I did not know that [email protected] could not send attachments.

PC(DXLabCommander):USB A port?[USB cable]?IC-7600:USB B port
PC(DXLabCommander):USB A port?CT-18(interface)?[REMOTE cable]?IC-PW1:Remote socket
IC-7600:ACC-2 socket?[ACC cable]?IC-PW1:ACC-1 socket

Does this tell you the status of the connection between my radio and my PC?
The PC, IC-7600, and IC-PW1 are connected like this.
In this state, IC-PW1 cannot be controlled well.

Shige, JJ1BCM
Re: IC-PW1 configuration in DXLabCommander

 

开云体育

I am taking this discussion off line.? I will post a summary if this discussion works out.

?

73,

Dave, w6de

?

From: [email protected] <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Dave w6de via groups.io
Sent: 20 March, 2025 19:07
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [DXLab] IC-PW1 configuration in DXLabCommander

?

As noted by Joe, W6TV, Dave AA6YQ, and myself W6DE, you can not share a single CIV connection with both a 7600 and a PW1 on that single CIV connection.?

Dave, AA6YQ is telling you the PW1 does not behave properly on a CIV connection and you need a separate CIV connection to only the PW1 from your computer to your PW1 to properly handle the bad behavior from the PW1.

?

73,

Dave, w6de

?

From: [email protected] <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Shigeru Ohsawa via groups.io
Sent: 20 March, 2025 09:17
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [DXLab] IC-PW1 configuration in DXLabCommander

?

Dave, W6DE

?

As shown in the attached figure, the PC is connected to the IC-7600 and the IC-PW1.
I cannot control IC-PW1 well in this condition.

?

Shige, JJ1BCM

?

差出人:?[email protected] <[email protected]> が Dave w6de via groups.io <w6de@...> の代理で送信
送信日时:?2025年3月20日 8:44
宛先:?[email protected] <[email protected]>
件名:?Re: [DXLab] IC-PW1 configuration in DXLabCommander

?

You will need a second CIV connection path for DXLab Commander running in the computer to communicate with the PW1.? Do you have a second CT-18 or other way to connect your computer to the PW1??

See the connection diagram in this article.

?

73,

Dave, w6de

?

From:?[email protected] <[email protected]> On Behalf Of ji8bxb.jj1bcm.shige via groups.io
Sent:?19 March, 2025 23:07
To:?[email protected]
Subject:?Re: [DXLab] IC-PW1 configuration in DXLabCommander

?

Thank you, Dave.

?

>Leave the PW1 address at 71 and the 7600 address at 7A.

IC-PW1 address at 74(DXLab's “Controlling an Icom PW1 Amplifier” instructs to set the address of IC-PW1 to 74.).

IC-7600 address at 7A.

?

>With the accessory cable and CIV cables directly connected between the PW1 and the 7600 can you successfully Sync the PW1 and 7600 together?

IC-7600 controls IC-PW1 perfectly.

?

Shige, JJ1BCM

?
Re: Populating maps with log data?

 

+ AA6YQ comments below
Is there a way to populate one of the DXLab maps with log records?? I am wondering whether worked or confirmed DXCC entities or zones can be illustrated on associated maps.? I have DX Atlas.
+ Yes. See



+ and



+ and



? ? ?73,

? ? ? ? ? Dave, AA6YQ
Populating maps with log data?

 

Is there a way to populate one of the DXLab maps with log records?? I am wondering whether worked or confirmed DXCC entities or zones can be illustrated on associated maps.? I have DX Atlas.

Thanks??
Rich, NU6T
Re: My last 12 OSO's would not upload to Lotw

 

# more AA6YQ comments below
It was the propagation window.? Somehow internet was in that window.? I must have done that but did not realize it.? Anyway all is well now.

?+ The error message " Invalid prop mode (internet) on line 5 " came from TQSL when it was processing the QSOs that DXKeeper directed it to submit to LoTW - not from DXKeeper. Thus there is no errorlog.txt file in your DXKeeper folder.
?
There is no such thing as an "Internet" QSO as far as logbook is concerned.? However, IRLP and Echolink are allowed. Go figure.
?

# ADIF defines an INTERNET propagation mode:

http://adif.org.uk/ADIF_Current#Propagation_Mode_Enumeration


# This choice is available in DXKeeper's "Propagation Mode" selector. It could also be selected in an imported QSO.

????? 73,

??????????? Dave AA6YQ
Re: IC-PW1 configuration in DXLabCommander

 

开云体育

As noted by Joe, W6TV, Dave AA6YQ, and myself W6DE, you can not share a single CIV connection with both a 7600 and a PW1 on that single CIV connection.?

Dave, AA6YQ is telling you the PW1 does not behave properly on a CIV connection and you need a separate CIV connection to only the PW1 from your computer to your PW1 to properly handle the bad behavior from the PW1.

?

73,

Dave, w6de

?

From: [email protected] <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Shigeru Ohsawa via groups.io
Sent: 20 March, 2025 09:17
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [DXLab] IC-PW1 configuration in DXLabCommander

?

Dave, W6DE

?

As shown in the attached figure, the PC is connected to the IC-7600 and the IC-PW1.
I cannot control IC-PW1 well in this condition.

?

Shige, JJ1BCM

?

差出人:?[email protected] <[email protected]> が Dave w6de via groups.io <w6de@...> の代理で送信
送信日时:?2025年3月20日 8:44
宛先:?[email protected] <[email protected]>
件名:?Re: [DXLab] IC-PW1 configuration in DXLabCommander

?

You will need a second CIV connection path for DXLab Commander running in the computer to communicate with the PW1.? Do you have a second CT-18 or other way to connect your computer to the PW1??

See the connection diagram in this article.

?

73,

Dave, w6de

?

From:?[email protected] <[email protected]> On Behalf Of ji8bxb.jj1bcm.shige via groups.io
Sent:?19 March, 2025 23:07
To:?[email protected]
Subject:?Re: [DXLab] IC-PW1 configuration in DXLabCommander

?

Thank you, Dave.

?

>Leave the PW1 address at 71 and the 7600 address at 7A.

IC-PW1 address at 74(DXLab's “Controlling an Icom PW1 Amplifier” instructs to set the address of IC-PW1 to 74.).

IC-7600 address at 7A.

?

>With the accessory cable and CIV cables directly connected between the PW1 and the 7600 can you successfully Sync the PW1 and 7600 together?

IC-7600 controls IC-PW1 perfectly.

?

Shige, JJ1BCM

?
Re: My last 12 OSO's would not upload to Lotw

 

On Thu, Mar 20, 2025 at 10:14?AM Dave AA6YQ via <aa6yq=[email protected]> wrote:
+ AA6YQ comments below
It was the propagation window.? Somehow internet was in that window.? I must have done that but did not realize it.? Anyway all is well now.

?+ The error message " Invalid prop mode (internet) on line 5 " came from TQSL when it was processing the QSOs that DXKeeper directed it to submit to LoTW - not from DXKeeper. Thus there is no errorlog.txt file in your DXKeeper folder.

There is no such thing as an "Internet" QSO as far as logbook is concerned.? However, IRLP and Echolink are allowed. Go figure.

73,
? ? -Rick
--
Rick Murphy, D. Sc., CISSP-ISSAP, K1MU/4, Annandale VA USA
Re: My last 12 OSO's would not upload to Lotw

 

+ AA6YQ comments below
It was the propagation window. ?Somehow internet was in that window. ?I must have done that but did not realize it. ?Anyway all is well now.

?+ The error message " Invalid prop mode (internet) on line 5 " came from TQSL when it was processing the QSOs that DXKeeper directed it to submit to LoTW - not from DXKeeper. Thus there is no errorlog.txt file in your DXKeeper folder.

? ? ? ? 73,
?
? ? ? ? ? ? ? Dave, AA6YQ
Re: IC-PW1 configuration in DXLabCommander

 

开云体育

+ AA6YQ comments below

?

A direct connection between transceiver and amplifier is not supported by DXLab Suite.? If you are using that connection, please seek help from Icom or one of the Icom support lists.

?

+ The PW1 fails to comply with Icom's CI-V bus specification. Like the Ethernet, the collisions can occur on the CI-V bus. However, the PW1 does not properly detect and recover from collisions.

+ With an Icom transceiver connect to a PW1 via a CI-V bus, no collisions occur.

+ With an Icom transceiver connected to a PW1 and a PC Com port managed by a transceiver control application like Commander, collisions can occur. Because it does not properly handle collisions, the PW1 can transmit on the wrong frequency, which can result in serious damage to the PW1. This is described in detail in this document developed by Larry K8UT:

/www.dxlabsuite.com/commander/Riding%20the%20CI-V%20Bus%20by%20K8UT.pdf

+ Commander's Secondary Com port enables provides a dedicated CI-V bus for the PW1 on which no collisions can occur, thus preventing damage to the amplifier. It has been successfully employed by many PW1 users.

????? ??73,

?????????????? Dave,

?
Re: My last 12 OSO's would not upload to Lotw

 

It was the propagation window. ?Somehow internet was in that window. ?I must have done that but did not realize it. ?Anyway all is well now. ?
?
Thanks so much.
?
Al ?KA9OUT
Re: Prefix/Call not transferred to DXKeeper

 

+ AA6YQ comments below

THANKS, I searched for that option and never saw it.... I made up that call as an example only.

+ See



73,

Dave, AA6YQ
Re: IC-PW1 configuration in DXLabCommander

 

Attachments are not conveyed here due the limitations of the free list.

A direct connection between transceiver and amplifier is not supported
by DXLab Suite. If you are using that connection, please seek help
from Icom or one of the Icom support lists.

73,

... Joe, W4TV

On 2025-03-20 4:55 AM, Shigeru Ohsawa via groups.io wrote:
________________________________
差出人: [email protected] <[email protected]> が Joe Subich, W4TV via groups.io <lists@...> の代理で送信
送信日时: 2025年3月20日 11:52
宛先: [email protected] <[email protected]>
件名: Re: [DXLab] IC-PW1 configuration in DXLabCommander
On 2025-03-19 10:06 PM, ji8bxb.jj1bcm.shige via groups.io wrote:

> Is this connection method not acceptable?
No, it is not. For DXLab Suite to control a PW-1 you must use the
following configuration:
<>
73,
... Joe, W4TV
On 2025-03-19 10:06 PM, ji8bxb.jj1bcm.shige via groups.io wrote:
Dave, W6DE

One is from IC-7600 (REMOTE terminal) to CT-18 to connect to PC. The other is to connect IC-7600 and PC with USB cable.
Is this connection method not acceptable?

Shige, JJ1BCM

Joe, W4TV
My explanation was not adequate.
As shown in the attached diagram, the PC is connected to the IC-7600 and IC-PW1.
In this state, IC-PW1 cannot be controlled well.
Shige,JJ1BCM
Re: Prefix/Call not transferred to DXKeeper

 

THANKS, I searched for that option and never saw it.... I made up that call as an example only.
73
Den
941 - 960 of 229179