¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

ctrl + shift + ? for shortcuts
© 2025 Groups.io

Re: TQSL

 

In DXKeeper, check the "Config" button. Then "QSL Config" on the lower left corner.
In the "DXKeeper QSL Configuration" window, select the "LoTW" tab.
What is the "TQSL" area labeled? (Mine says "TQSL 2.8.1")?
What is the "TQSL exe pathname" set to?? (It should always be "C:\Program Files (x86)\TrustedQSL\tqsl.exe".)

What you're seeing is the result of having TQSL installed in more than one directory. If you install TQSL into somewhere other than the default, it's up to you to always install to that folder.

Install TQSL into the "Program Files(x86)" directory and remove any other copies of tqsl.exe.
73,
? ? -Rick

On Sun, May 25, 2025 at 4:07?AM Roger Greengrass via <roger.greengrass=[email protected]> wrote:

Every time DXLab Suite starts, I get the message "A new TQSL (V2.8.1) is available".
I am already running that version.
?
Any suggstions as to how to address this?
?
Thanks,
Roger
EI8KN.
?



--
Rick Murphy, D. Sc., CISSP-ISSAP, K1MU/4, Annandale VA USA


TQSL

 

Every time DXLab Suite starts, I get the message "A new TQSL (V2.8.1) is available".
I am already running that version.
?
Any suggstions as to how to address this?
?
Thanks,
Roger
EI8KN.
?


Re: "Bouncing" Filters Group in DX Commander

 

Will do, thanks!


Re: support for new radio

 

+ From what URL can I download documentation for this radio's CAT instruction set?
There is no CAT instruction set info in any of the documentation at:
<>


73,

... Joe, W4TV


On 2025-05-24 4:34 PM, Dave AA6YQ wrote:
+ AA6YQ comments below


We are pleased to introduce the new FTX-1F and FTX-1Optima"


"FTX-1Field is a Portable 6W or 10W* HF/50MHz/VHF/UHF Multimode
Transceiver.?(*10w with 13.8VDC supply.)"



"FTX-1Optima is the FTX-1Field with a 100W on HF/6m & 50W on VHF/UHF
clip-on Linear Amplifier with built in ATU for HF/6M."

+ From what URL can I download documentation for this radio's CAT instruction set?
73,
Dave, AA6YQ


Re: support for new radio

 

+ AA6YQ comments below
We are pleased to introduce the new FTX-1F and FTX-1Optima"

"FTX-1Field is a Portable 6W or 10W* HF/50MHz/VHF/UHF Multimode Transceiver.?(*10w with 13.8VDC supply.)"

"FTX-1Optima is the FTX-1Field with a 100W on HF/6m & 50W on VHF/UHF clip-on Linear Amplifier with built in ATU for HF/6M."

+ From what URL can I download documentation for this radio's CAT instruction set?

? ? ? 73,

? ? ? ? ? ? Dave, AA6YQ


Re: support for new radio

 

The referenced yaesu link shows:

"We are pleased to introduce the new FTX-1F and FTX-1Optima"

"FTX-1Field is a Portable 6W or 10W* HF/50MHz/VHF/UHF Multimode Transceiver.?(*10w with 13.8VDC supply.)"

"FTX-1Optima is the FTX-1Field with a 100W on HF/6m & 50W on VHF/UHF clip-on Linear Amplifier with built in ATU for HF/6M."

Grin, good power for a reciever!

NU6T, Rich

Richard Hill

On Sat, May 24, 2025, 12:35?PM Dave AA6YQ via <aa6yq=[email protected]> wrote:
+ AA6YQ comments below

will dxlab support the new ftx-1?

+ I can't find any information about the FTX-1 on Yaesu's web site:



+ My understanding is that FTX-1 is a receiver that covers 30kHz through 174MHz and from 400MHz through 470MHz including SWL, FM
broadcast, and Air-band.

+ Since it has no ability to transmit, the answer to your question is "no", unless its CAT documentation - when available - shows
that it's CAT instruction set is a proper subset of that of a supported Yaesu transceiver.

? ? ? ? 73,

? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?Dave, AA6YQ








Re: support for new radio

 

+ AA6YQ comments below

will dxlab support the new ftx-1?

+ I can't find any information about the FTX-1 on Yaesu's web site:



+ My understanding is that FTX-1 is a receiver that covers 30kHz through 174MHz and from 400MHz through 470MHz including SWL, FM
broadcast, and Air-band.

+ Since it has no ability to transmit, the answer to your question is "no", unless its CAT documentation - when available - shows
that it's CAT instruction set is a proper subset of that of a supported Yaesu transceiver.

73,

Dave, AA6YQ


Re: "Bouncing" Filters Group in DX Commander

 

+ AA6YQ comments below

My transceiver is an IC7300. I am on FT8 with WSJT. A CW DX spot comes out, and I double-click in spot collector. Commander changes to the correct frequency, mode, and filter bandwidth. (It seem sometimes I have to stop monitoring on WSJT, and sometimes not, or it will grab me back to the FT8 frequency, but that's not what this is about). When I return to FT8 by re-enabling the monitor in WSJT, I see that the bandwidth is 2.7 kHz. Before that, it was 3+ kHz on the waterfall. I then change the Filters Group setting back to Normal (or Wide), and the bandwith goes back to the 3+ kHz. But now, the Group bandwidth display periodic bounces from normal to narrow, about 1 to 2 times per second. I can change the filter to wide, same bouncing. I can change it to narrow (where it was on CW immediately prior to coming back to FT8), and there is no bounce. There is some kind of polling going on and the state it keeps trying is Narrow. I don't hear any bandwidth changes on the radio while this is going on, and I don't see any change in the WSJT spectrum.

+ So that I can see what's going on, please do the following:

1. on the Configuration window's General tab, check the "Log debugging info" box

2. terminate Commander

3. start Commander

4. replicate the misbehavior you describe above

5. on the Configuration window's General tab, uncheck the "Log debugging info" box

6. attach the errorlog.txt file from your Commander folder to an email message, and send that message to me via

aa6yq (at) ambersoft.com

73,

Dave, AA6YQ


"Bouncing" Filters Group in DX Commander

 

I have observed this behavior while never noticing it before.
?
My transceiver is an IC7300.? I am on FT8 with WSJT.? A CW DX spot comes out, and I double-click in spot collector.? Commander changes to the correct frequency, mode, and filter bandwidth.? (It seem sometimes I have to stop monitoring on WSJT, and sometimes not, or it will grab me back to the FT8 frequency, but that's not what this is about).? When I return to FT8 by re-enabling the monitor in WSJT, I see that the bandwidth is 2.7 kHz.? Before that, it was 3+ kHz on the waterfall.? I then change the Filters Group setting back to Normal (or Wide), and the bandwith goes back to the 3+ kHz.? But now, the Group bandwidth display periodic bounces from normal to narrow, about 1 to 2 times per second.? I can change the filter to wide, same bouncing.? I can change it to narrow (where it was on CW immediately prior to coming back to FT8), and there is no bounce.? There is some kind of polling going on and the state it keeps trying is Narrow. I don't hear any bandwidth changes on the radio while this is going on, and I don't see any change in the WSJT spectrum.
?
Once I shut down commander and restart, this behavior disappears and "normal" is the constant state of the filter group.
?
Any ideas what's going on?
?
73,
Dean W8ZF


Re: Audio Alarm Includies Grid Square

 

+ AA6YQ comments below

When I post to the Cluster (using SpotCollector) the audio alarm readout says "Grid Square FO93" included in the announcement.

First of all:

1. F093 is wrong, and no matter what Call is Spotted, the same Grid Square is announced.
2. Even in Spots announced by other stations, the Grid Square FO93 is announced.

What is the source of this and how can I turn it off?

+ That's the result of a regression. I've sent you a new version of SpotCollector with this defect corrected; please let me know how it goes.

73,

Dave, AA6YQ


support for new radio

 

will dxlab support the new ftx-1?

thanks


Reggie
k6xr


Audio Alarm Includies Grid Square

 

When I post to the Cluster (using SpotCollector) the audio alarm readout says "Grid Square FO93" included in the announcement.?
?
First of all:
?
1. F093 is wrong, and no matter what Call is Spotted, the same Grid Square is announced.
2. Even in Spots announced by other stations, the Grid Square FO93 is announced.
?
What is the source of this and how can I turn it off?
?
SC 9.9.2
?
73, N0AN, Hasan


Re: new POTA and SOTA poll #poll-notice

 

+ AA6YQ comments below.

You'd have to account for the fact that some parks are in multiple counties, states, and even grids.

+ The downloadable POTA park definition file specifies the following for each POTA reference number:

- Park Name, e.g. "Acadia National Park"

- Active

- DXCC entity code, e.g. 291 (continental US)

- DXCC entity abbreviation and primary administrative subdivision, e.g. US-ME

- latitude & longitude

- grid square

+ Double-clicking on a Spot Database Entry with POTA reference NO-1631 - Reinaya Nature Reserve - specifies NO-IN,NO-MR, meaning that it lies in two Norwegian primary subdivisions, could display a small window asking the user to choose the correct primary subdivision or leave it blank.

+ Multiple grid squares could be handled in the same way.

73,

Dave, AA6YQ


Re: new POTA and SOTA poll #poll-notice

 

You'd have to account for the fact that some parks are in multiple counties, states, and even grids.

Earl / KD5XB

Sent from Proton Mail Android

-------- Original Message --------
On 5/23/25 2:09 PM, Dave AA6YQ <aa6yq@...> wrote:

+ AA6YQ comments below

I'll argue that when activators submit logs to LotW and don't create and use appropriate locations it may "hurt" grid or County hunters, and if in a different state or country, it may "hurt" WAS or DXCC hunters.

+ After completion of the proposed "step 3" in POTA/SOTA support, double-clicking a Spot Database Entry that specifies a POTA code would query the local POTA database (generated from ) for that park's U.S. State and Gridsquare. This would prevent the location misinformation caused by callbook location information being tied to a callsign.

73,

Dave, AA6YQ







Re: new POTA and SOTA poll #poll-notice

 

¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

The ability for SpotCollector to lookup a park's location would be very welcomed!? Currently, I plug the POTA designator into the pota.app site so I can see on a map where it is.? If it's in the same area as the callsign owner's location, I use the beam heading from DXView.? If not, I approximate from the map.

73,
Ken, KJ9B


From: [email protected] <[email protected]> on behalf of Dave AA6YQ via groups.io <aa6yq@...>
Sent: Friday, May 23, 2025 4:09 PM
To: [email protected] <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [DXLab] new POTA and SOTA poll #poll-notice
?
+ AA6YQ comments below

I'll argue that when activators submit logs to LotW? and don't create and use appropriate locations it may "hurt" grid or County hunters, and if in a different state or country, it may "hurt" WAS or DXCC hunters.

+ After completion of the proposed "step 3" in POTA/SOTA support, double-clicking a Spot Database Entry that specifies a POTA code would query the local POTA database (generated from ? for that park's U.S. State and Gridsquare. This would prevent the location misinformation caused by callbook location information being tied to a callsign.

???? 73,

???????????? Dave, AA6YQ







Re: new POTA and SOTA poll #poll-notice

 

+ AA6YQ comments below

Been thinking about this a lot today as I have been chasing POTA on 20m FT8. My overall goal is to work ATNO's first and then whoever else is activating second (who may be activating multiples and no way to tell if the additional parks are ATNO's). How I am doing it now is using GridTracker as it takes spots from pota.app and indicates them on the Call Roster. I also use Chrome with POTAPlus to inform me if they are ATNO's. I would much rather just use SpotCollector because everything would be on one application to include the logging interface between WSJT-X and DXKeeper.

This is what I would wish SpotCollector would do - let me know which ones are ATNO's plus displaying the spots from pota.app as well as those from other sources - I use the IZ2LSC cluster that has a pre-filtered SOTA/POTA feed. When I work and log it, it already takes the POTA info and adds it to the user defined field in DXKeeper already, so I don't think that one needs to even mess with DXKeeper. You would download the CSV file from pota.app under My Stats of all of the unique parks you have credited to you. This database would be checked against the incoming spot data to see if it was an ATNO and then indicate it.

+ Having to download a CSV file to update your POTA status each time you work a new POTA park would frankly be a kludge. Were this to become widespread practice, whatever if serving that CSV file might become a bottleneck.

+ For NPOTA, DXKeeper's NPOTA progress report would generate an SQL query that could be invoked from SpotCollector to identify any active stations in unworked U.S. parks. That too was a kludge, but given NPOTA's one-year lifespan, it was a tolerable compromise.

73,

Dave, AA6YQ


Re: new POTA and SOTA poll #poll-notice

 

+ AA6YQ comments below

I'll argue that when activators submit logs to LotW and don't create and use appropriate locations it may "hurt" grid or County hunters, and if in a different state or country, it may "hurt" WAS or DXCC hunters.

+ After completion of the proposed "step 3" in POTA/SOTA support, double-clicking a Spot Database Entry that specifies a POTA code would query the local POTA database (generated from ) for that park's U.S. State and Gridsquare. This would prevent the location misinformation caused by callbook location information being tied to a callsign.

73,

Dave, AA6YQ


Re: new POTA and SOTA poll #poll-notice

 

Been thinking about this a lot today as I have been chasing POTA on 20m FT8.? My overall goal is to work ATNO's first and then whoever else is activating second (who may be activating multiples and no way to tell if the additional parks are ATNO's).? How I am doing it now is using GridTracker as it takes spots from pota.app and indicates them on the Call Roster.? I also use Chrome with POTAPlus to inform me if they are ATNO's.? I would much rather just use SpotCollector because everything would be on one application to include the logging interface between WSJT-X and DXKeeper.
?
This is what I would wish SpotCollector would do - let me know which ones are ATNO's plus displaying the spots from pota.app as well as those from other sources - I use the IZ2LSC cluster that has a pre-filtered SOTA/POTA feed.? When I work and log it, it already takes the POTA info and adds it to the user defined field in DXKeeper already, so I don't think that one needs to even mess with DXKeeper.??You would download the CSV file from pota.app under My Stats of all of the unique parks you have credited to you.? This database would be checked against the incoming spot data to see if it was an ATNO and then indicate it.
?
73
Dennis WB0WAO
?
?


Re: new POTA and SOTA poll #poll-notice

 

I'll argue that when activators submit logs to LotW? and don't create and use appropriate locations it may "hurt" grid or County hunters, and if in a different state or country, it may "hurt" WAS or DXCC hunters.

If we know someone is not submitting properly, as Elmers we might want to politely inform them of better practice.? They might not know better or need a friendly or informative push.? Their current log might not be multiple location friendly like DXLab, and they may not want separate logs for each activation location.? They may not recognize or understand the problem and think that they are doing a good thing.

NU6T, Rich

Richard Hill

On Fri, May 23, 2025, 10:01?AM Dave AA6YQ via <aa6yq=[email protected]> wrote:
+ AA6YQ comments below
How is all this going to be affected when an activator goes home znd uploads to LotW, eQSL, etc, as if he was at home and not in a park?? This is just about as common as breathing.
+ Neither LoTW nor eQSL provide "POTA credit". What matters is that an activator correctly submit QSOs to POTA so that chasers will get credit.

? ? ? ? ? 73,

? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? Dave, AA6YQ


Re: Spotcollector frozen (well sorta)

 

+ AA6YQ comments below
FYI only: Prune was set to 7 days.? It had been set to that value for years. I learned long ago to manage the size of the spot database.? Task manager did not show anything churning in the background. That's why I am a bit mystified that by selecting a change to "Prune Spot Database" corrected my issue.
+ You reported that the new misbehavior first occurred after a Windows update, so the initial hypothesis is that this update reduced your system's ability to handle the compute/memory load generated by your previous SpotCollector configuration. I suggest that you check Windows' virtual memory configuration, and confirm that your DXLab applications are each considered "safe" by Windows Defender and by any other anti-malware you have installed.
?
? ? ?73,

? ? ? ? ?Dave, AA6YQ
?