¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

ctrl + shift + ? for shortcuts
© 2025 Groups.io
  1. DXLab
  2. Messages
Expanded Topics Messages Polls
Date
Re: JD1BMM curiosity in SC and DXV

Phil Cooper
 

Hallo Vlad,

Firstly, I am very sorry to hear of the loss of your brother. I know that
must have been hard for you.

Thanks for the JD1BMM info, but I already have that call listed in the way
you describe in SC.
I think I will try to delete that line, and re-enter it, just to see.
But, SC does recognise it as MT, as it shows as JD1-M in the DXCC column.

Most confusing!

73 for now

Phil GU0SUP


---
avast! Antivirus: Outbound message clean.
Virus Database (VPS): 090909-0, 09/09/2009
Tested on: 09/09/2009 18:23:23
avast! - copyright (c) 1988-2009 ALWIL Software.
Re: Notch Filter

 

No bother at all, Bob. Inquiring about capabilities and suggesting new ones are primary activities for this group.

I added PSK notch filter to WinWarbler's enhancement list.

73,

Dave, AA6YQ

--- In dxlab@..., "Bob" <rabisch@...> wrote:

Ok, thank you Dave. Great program.

You never know until you ask.

Appreciate the quick response, hopefully I
did not bother anyone.

73
Bob
K4QHH

--------------------------------------------------
From: "Dave AA6YQ" <aa6yq@...>
Sent: Tuesday, September 08, 2009 11:37 PM
To: <dxlab@...>
Subject: RE: [dxlab] Notch Filter

AA6YQ comments below
-----Original Message-----
From: dxlab@... [mailto:dxlab@...]On Behalf Of Bob
Sent: Tuesday, September 08, 2009 9:32 PM
To: dxlab@...
Subject: Re: [dxlab] Notch Filter


Tnx Dave.

Could it be extended to PSK also?

The RTTY notch filter used is provided by the MMTTY engine that
WinWarbler utilizes for RTTY operations. The PSKCore engine that
WinWarbler
uses for PSK operations does not provide a notch filter. Providing a notch
filter for PSK operations would require extending PSKCore; this is
technically feasible, but not a priority.

73,

Dave, AA6YQ



------------------------------------

Yahoo! Groups Links
Re: Notch Filter

 

Ok, thank you Dave. Great program.

You never know until you ask.

Appreciate the quick response, hopefully I
did not bother anyone.

73
Bob
K4QHH

--------------------------------------------------
From: "Dave AA6YQ" <aa6yq@...>
Sent: Tuesday, September 08, 2009 11:37 PM
To: <dxlab@...>
Subject: RE: [dxlab] Notch Filter

AA6YQ comments below
-----Original Message-----
From: dxlab@... [mailto:dxlab@...]On Behalf Of Bob
Sent: Tuesday, September 08, 2009 9:32 PM
To: dxlab@...
Subject: Re: [dxlab] Notch Filter


Tnx Dave.

Could it be extended to PSK also?

The RTTY notch filter used is provided by the MMTTY engine that
WinWarbler utilizes for RTTY operations. The PSKCore engine that WinWarbler
uses for PSK operations does not provide a notch filter. Providing a notch
filter for PSK operations would require extending PSKCore; this is
technically feasible, but not a priority.

73,

Dave, AA6YQ



------------------------------------

Yahoo! Groups Links
Re: WAC report

Art Searle
 

Hi All,

I asked Bill, NC1L, this morning. Here's our exchange:
- - - - - - - - - -
I wrote:
The WAC application indicates that you can use DXCC account credits. Does that apply to all credits, even those that came from LotW DXCC applications?

Art:
Once the credits are in your DXCC account they are OK to use.
73

Bill Moore NC1L
Awards Branch Manager
- - - - - - - - - - -

So, there's your definitive answer. I can see why no public announcement. It's sort of back door. No ability to apply for WAC directly through LotW but you can use previously accepted DXCC credits. This makes sense to me as why do all that programming for 6 QSLs for the award. Even the 5 Band WAC only requires 30 QSLs and there are no 12, 17, 30m endorsements for WAC.

73 Art W2NRA
"Keep to the Code!"
w2nra.com

I'm dubious. There's been a ton of pressure on the ARRL to support more
awards with LotW. If WAC were now supported by LotW, we'd have seen a press
release.
--- In dxlab@..., "Dave AA6YQ" <aa6yq@...> wrote:

AA6YQ comments below
-----Original Message-----
From: dxlab@... [mailto:dxlab@...]On Behalf Of Phil
Cooper

Hi all,

Larry W6NWS quoted the ARRL site................
"... At the present time credits in the ARRL LogBook of The World (LoTW)
system cannot be claimed for WAC credit. Applicants who have a current DXCC
award in the DXCC computer system can apply for WAC by completing the WAC
application form and sending it to the address noted above, listing credits
to be claimed on the application form. In this case QSL cards are not
required. ...."

I did find the above statement a little confusing at first, but it implies
that LoTW credits that are now part of your DXCC claim CAN indeed be used.

I'm dubious. There's been a ton of pressure on the ARRL to support more
awards with LotW. If WAC were now supported by LotW, we'd have seen a press
release. You can configure DXKeeper to "count" LotW confirmations when
generating a WAC progress report; I'm not going to "hardwire" this untill I
see a press release.


So, I thought I would do a search and see what I came up with. It took a
while to get the proper SQL function, but I got there in the end.
The confusing bit was having to remember to use both the LoTW QSL Received
and also the QSL Received functions for all of S and V.
But, after a few goes, I got it right, and found that I do indeed have
enough DXCC credits to claim 5BWAC - all on RTTY.

You can do this by checking the "include LotW confirmations in VUCC, WAC,
& Maidenhead progress" box at the top of the Config window's Awards tab
before initiating the WAC progress report.


Another point for those wishing to check whether they have 5BWAC, you must
also filter the log for each band as well as filtering for QSL's verified.
I just entered the SQL expression in the ADV boxes, and then changed the
band after each click of the WAC progress button. Save the resulting file as
something like WAC-80m and you are away!

You could create a script to generate a WAC progress report for each
band. The MultiWAS.txt file in DXKeeper's Scripts folder illustrates the
technique.

73,

Dave, AA6YQ
Re: JD1BMM curiosity in SC and DXV

Vlad_UA6JD
 

Phil
SpotCollector
1.Config
2.Overrides Tab
3.Add Callsign JD1BMM then select in DXCC Entity - Minami Torishima
4.Close Config
All NEW spots from JD1BMM will be as Minami Torishima
If you want update old spots just enter in DXCluster window command
sh/dx jd1bmm 100 and last 100 spots from JD1BMM keep in your database
as M-T.
--
73 Vlad UA6JD

gadgets to your www.qrz.com
examples www.qrz.com/db/ua6jd
just double-click and install



You wrote :

Hi all,
I've just noticed that whenever a spot for JD1BMM comes through the
cluster, there is NO heading noted.
There is a heading for all other calls I've seen, but not for this particular call.
I opened DXV, and if you enter JD1BMM, then click GO, it does not
show any LAT/LON, SP DX, cont or grid, and no CQ or ITU zone.
I clicked on DXCC, and all the data "appears" to be there.
Also, if you enter JD1OMM (for Ogasawara), then all info appears
correctly, and if you have the DXCC database open, it goes to the JD1-O entry.
BUT...... if you do the same for JD1BMM, it does NOT go to the entry for Minami Torishima.
Is this an oddity? Or is it something I have done??
BTW....... DXK and SC both know I have not worked it.
73 de Phil GU0SUP
--
73 Vlad UA6JD

gadgets to your www.qrz.com
examples www.qrz.com/db/ua6jd
just double-click and install
JD1BMM curiosity in SC and DXV

gu0sup
 

Hi all,

I've just noticed that whenever a spot for JD1BMM comes through the cluster, there is NO heading noted.
There is a heading for all other calls I've seen, but not for this particular call.

I opened DXV, and if you enter JD1BMM, then click GO, it does not show any LAT/LON, SP DX, cont or grid, and no CQ or ITU zone.

I clicked on DXCC, and all the data "appears" to be there.

Also, if you enter JD1OMM (for Ogasawara), then all info appears correctly, and if you have the DXCC database open, it goes to the JD1-O entry.
BUT...... if you do the same for JD1BMM, it does NOT go to the entry for Minami Torishima.

Is this an oddity? Or is it something I have done??

BTW....... DXK and SC both know I have not worked it.

73 de Phil GU0SUP
Re: Complete DX Lab Uninstall for clean re-install?

 

I totally disagree Ben. If you download and install the Launcher program as suggested in the Installation instructions, then the rest of the applications can be installed from Launcher with a single button click. Uninstalling, is done via Add/Remove programs in the Windows control panel which is exactly the same procedure used by every other installed Windows program.

What creates a mess are people who don't read and follow instructions and start removing files or eliding the registry without having a clue about what they are doing. The same actions would create the same mess no matter what application you consider, "Microsoft Office" for example.

73, Rich - W3ZJ

ben frantzac wrote:

Hi!

This software (DXLab) is not too complicated as such. But somehow the developers
have succeeded to make installing and uninstalling of this program quite a mess. fThere is much to improve in that respect. That is my humble opinion and not blaming anybody. I myself could not create even a simplest software. I just use them.


Ben
Re: Pathfinder - not working..

 

It's working fine here as well.

73, Rich - W3ZJ


N1BAA - Jose Castillo wrote:

For what it is worth...
Pathfinder is working well here and enters data
into Capture window just fine!

Jose - N1BAA
Re: Complete DX Lab Uninstall for clean re-install?

Ron Rossi
 

DXLab suite has one of the most comprehensive and easy to use install and upgrade facilities I have used. The only potentially confusing part of the operation is checking to see if you have already installed a version of "Launcher". This is pretty clearly explained on the DXLabs home page. Once you have a copy of Launcher installed, then installing or upgrading the other components fantastically easy.

73 es God Bless de KK1L...Ron Rossi (kk1l@...) <><
QTH: Jericho, Vermont
My page:



ben frantzac wrote:

Hi!

This software (DXLab) is not too complicated as such. But somehow the developers
have succeeded to make installing and uninstalling of this program quite a mess. fThere is much to improve in that respect. That is my humble opinion and not blaming anybody. I myself could not create even a simplest software. I just use them.


Ben

--- On Tue, 9/8/09, aa6yq <aa6yq@...> wrote:

From: aa6yq <aa6yq@...>
Subject: [dxlab] Re: Complete DX Lab Uninstall for clean re-install?
To: dxlab@...
Date: Tuesday, September 8, 2009, 10:51 AM










+++More AA6YQ comments below



--- In dxlab@yahoogroups. com, "themmd2003" <rickwilliams@ ...> wrote:




What happens when you direct the Launcher to install Commander and
SpotCollector?



The Launcher shows both commander and spot collector as installed already and does not offer the install option.



That means that the Registry settings that the Launcher relies on to determine if these applications are installed indicate that these applications are installed.


If you click on upgrade it generates the message cannot upgrade because "path...spotcollect or.exe does not exist. Upgrade aborted.




That means that the "Program Path" you've specified for SpotCollector on the Launcher's Config window is invalid.


I need to find out if there is something I can delete that will cause launcher to know that commander and spotcollector are not actually installed and allow me to reinstall them.




Your PC's Windows Registry is in an inconsistent state. You can try running the free-ware Revo un-installer, but at this point there can be no guarantees short of "re-install Windows" (which I am not suggesting or recommending) .


73,



Dave, AA6YQ




























------------------------------------

Yahoo! Groups Links
Re: Complete DX Lab Uninstall for clean re-install?

 

I'm not asking for advice on implementation details. You said "there is much to improve"; what do you have in mind?

73,

Dave, AA6YQ

--- In dxlab@..., ben frantzac <cergender@...> wrote:

Well, quite honestly I cannot help very much in computer technics. Approaching 70 years and never learned programming yet. I hope to start one of these days though

Ben

--- On Wed, 9/9/09, Dave AA6YQ <aa6yq@...> wrote:

From: Dave AA6YQ <aa6yq@...>
Subject: RE: [dxlab] Re: Complete DX Lab Uninstall for clean re-install?
To: dxlab@...
Date: Wednesday, September 9, 2009, 1:14 AM






?





>>>AA6YQ comments below



-----Original Message-----

From: dxlab@yahoogroups. com [mailto:dxlab@yahoogroups. com]On Behalf Of

ben frantzac

Sent: Wednesday, September 09, 2009 3:44 AM

To: dxlab@yahoogroups. com

Subject: Re: [dxlab] Re: Complete DX Lab Uninstall for clean re-install?



Hi!



This software (DXLab) is not too complicated as such. But somehow the

developers have succeeded to make installing and uninstalling of this

program quite a mess. There is much to improve in that respect.



What do you have in mind?


73,



Dave, AA6YQ































[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Re: Complete DX Lab Uninstall for clean re-install?

 

Well, quite honestly I cannot help very much in computer technics. Approaching 70 years and never learned programming yet. I hope to start one of these days though

Ben

--- On Wed, 9/9/09, Dave AA6YQ <aa6yq@...> wrote:

From: Dave AA6YQ <aa6yq@...>
Subject: RE: [dxlab] Re: Complete DX Lab Uninstall for clean re-install?
To: dxlab@...
Date: Wednesday, September 9, 2009, 1:14 AM






?





>>>AA6YQ comments below



-----Original Message-----

From: dxlab@yahoogroups. com [mailto:dxlab@yahoogroups. com]On Behalf Of

ben frantzac

Sent: Wednesday, September 09, 2009 3:44 AM

To: dxlab@yahoogroups. com

Subject: Re: [dxlab] Re: Complete DX Lab Uninstall for clean re-install?



Hi!



This software (DXLab) is not too complicated as such. But somehow the

developers have succeeded to make installing and uninstalling of this

program quite a mess. There is much to improve in that respect.



What do you have in mind?


73,



Dave, AA6YQ
Re: Complete DX Lab Uninstall for clean re-install?

 

AA6YQ comments below
-----Original Message-----
From: dxlab@... [mailto:dxlab@...]On Behalf Of
ben frantzac
Sent: Wednesday, September 09, 2009 3:44 AM
To: dxlab@...
Subject: Re: [dxlab] Re: Complete DX Lab Uninstall for clean re-install?


Hi!

This software (DXLab) is not too complicated as such. But somehow the
developers have succeeded to make installing and uninstalling of this
program quite a mess. There is much to improve in that respect.

What do you have in mind?
73,

Dave, AA6YQ
Re: Complete DX Lab Uninstall for clean re-install?

 

Hi!

This software (DXLab) is not too complicated as such. But somehow the developers
have succeeded to make installing and uninstalling of this program quite a mess. fThere is much to improve in that respect. That is my humble opinion and not blaming anybody. I myself could not create even a simplest software. I just use them.


Ben

--- On Tue, 9/8/09, aa6yq <aa6yq@...> wrote:

From: aa6yq <aa6yq@...>
Subject: [dxlab] Re: Complete DX Lab Uninstall for clean re-install?
To: dxlab@...
Date: Tuesday, September 8, 2009, 10:51 AM






?





+++More AA6YQ comments below



--- In dxlab@yahoogroups. com, "themmd2003" <rickwilliams@ ...> wrote:



What happens when you direct the Launcher to install Commander and
SpotCollector?



The Launcher shows both commander and spot collector as installed already and does not offer the install option.



That means that the Registry settings that the Launcher relies on to determine if these applications are installed indicate that these applications are installed.


If you click on upgrade it generates the message cannot upgrade because "path...spotcollect or.exe does not exist. Upgrade aborted.



That means that the "Program Path" you've specified for SpotCollector on the Launcher's Config window is invalid.


I need to find out if there is something I can delete that will cause launcher to know that commander and spotcollector are not actually installed and allow me to reinstall them.



Your PC's Windows Registry is in an inconsistent state. You can try running the free-ware Revo un-installer, but at this point there can be no guarantees short of "re-install Windows" (which I am not suggesting or recommending) .


73,



Dave, AA6YQ































[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Re: Pathfinder - not working..

Tom Roberts
 

Thank? You Dave!
?
It is now up again and all is well in my world of Amateur Radio.
?
Regards.. Tom..

--- On Tue, 9/8/09, Dave AA6YQ <aa6yq@...> wrote:


From: Dave AA6YQ <aa6yq@...>
Subject: RE: [dxlab] Pathfinder - not working..
To: dxlab@...
Date: Tuesday, September 8, 2009, 4:06 PM


?



On the Pathfinder's Config window, change the QRZ URL to

. com/db/{TargetCallsign}

What you have there now is incorrect, and is the reason DXKeeper cannot
access QRZ.com via Pathfinder.

73,

Dave, AA6YQ

-----Original Message-----
From: dxlab@yahoogroups. com [mailto:dxlab@yahoogroups. com]On Behalf Of
Tom Roberts
Sent: Tuesday, September 08, 2009 10:10 AM
To: dxlab@yahoogroups. com
Subject: RE: [dxlab] Pathfinder - not working..

Good Morning Dave & The Group:
?
Your Call, comes up with out error on both the QRZ and Buck, however when
the calls are
entered through the DXKeeper it states "No Call Found".
?
Sorry I did not give you all the information you required and be more
specific
in regards to my problem.
?
I am certain it is due to the new QRZ Software in place. It occurred at that
time.
?
. com/db/(your_callsign) - Con fig Info in Pathfinder.
?
Thank You?and the Team - ?for your hard work and support. Tom..
?

--- On Mon, 9/7/09, Dave AA6YQ <aa6yq@ambersoft. com> wrote:

From: Dave AA6YQ <aa6yq@ambersoft. com>
Subject: RE: [dxlab] Pathfinder - not working..
To: dxlab@yahoogroups. com
Date: Monday, September 7, 2009, 8:00 PM

?

If you type my callsign into Pathfinder's callsign box and click the QRZ
button, what happens?

If you type my callsign into Pathfinder's callsign box and click the Buck
button, what happens?

If you open Pathfinder's Config window, to what is the QRZ.com URL set?

73,

Dave, AA6YQ

-----Original Message-----
From: dxlab@yahoogroups. com [mailto:dxlab@ yahoogroups. com]On Behalf Of
Tom Roberts
Sent: Monday, September 07, 2009 8:50 PM
To: dxlab@yahoogroups. com
Subject: [dxlab] Pathfinder - not working..

Dear Dave and the group..
?

I have not been able to access QRZ for several days. I have made the
necessary
adjustments to Pathfinder, with not success.
?
I hope there is a fix.. regards.. Tom
?
?



------------ --------- --------- ------

Yahoo! Groups Links

No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 8.5.339 / Virus Database: 270.13.74/2339 - Release Date: 09/07/09
06:40:00

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

------------ --------- --------- ------

Yahoo! Groups Links

No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 8.5.339 / Virus Database: 270.13.74/2339 - Release Date: 09/08/09
06:48:00



















[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Re: Notch Filter

 

AA6YQ comments below
-----Original Message-----
From: dxlab@... [mailto:dxlab@...]On Behalf Of Bob
Sent: Tuesday, September 08, 2009 9:32 PM
To: dxlab@...
Subject: Re: [dxlab] Notch Filter


Tnx Dave.

Could it be extended to PSK also?

The RTTY notch filter used is provided by the MMTTY engine that
WinWarbler utilizes for RTTY operations. The PSKCore engine that WinWarbler
uses for PSK operations does not provide a notch filter. Providing a notch
filter for PSK operations would require extending PSKCore; this is
technically feasible, but not a priority.

73,

Dave, AA6YQ
Re: Notch Filter

 

Tnx Dave.

Could it be extended to PSK also?

Bob
K4QHH

--------------------------------------------------
From: "Dave AA6YQ" <aa6yq@...>
Sent: Tuesday, September 08, 2009 9:02 PM
To: <dxlab@...>
Subject: RE: [dxlab] Notch Filter

AA6YQ comments below
-----Original Message-----
From: dxlab@... [mailto:dxlab@...]On Behalf Of Bob
Sent: Tuesday, September 08, 2009 8:57 PM
To: dxlab@...
Subject: [dxlab] Notch Filter


I was wondering if WinWarbler had a selectable Notch filter using the sound
card. This would allow a strong station within the PSK passband to be
notched out.

I know I can use the optimize feature to center the received station in the
radios filter and then can select a narrow filter on my rig to eliminate
other possible QRM.

WinWarbler does not provide a notch filter for PSK operations; it does
provide one for RTTY operations.

73,

Dave, AA6YQ



------------------------------------

Yahoo! Groups Links
Re: Notch Filter

 

AA6YQ comments below
-----Original Message-----
From: dxlab@... [mailto:dxlab@...]On Behalf Of Bob
Sent: Tuesday, September 08, 2009 8:57 PM
To: dxlab@...
Subject: [dxlab] Notch Filter


I was wondering if WinWarbler had a selectable Notch filter using the sound
card. This would allow a strong station within the PSK passband to be
notched out.

I know I can use the optimize feature to center the received station in the
radios filter and then can select a narrow filter on my rig to eliminate
other possible QRM.

WinWarbler does not provide a notch filter for PSK operations; it does
provide one for RTTY operations.

73,

Dave, AA6YQ
Notch Filter

 

I was wondering if WinWarbler had a selectable Notch
filter using the sound card. This would allow a strong
station within the PSK passband to be notched out.

I know I can use the optimize feature to center the received station in the radios filter and then can select
a narrow filter on my rig to eliminate other possible QRM.

tnx & 73

Bob
K4QHH
Re: BEGIN MACRO Request or Did I Miss This Also?

 

With "set QSO start when RST Rcvd" unchecked, these are the actions that
will set a QSO's start time:

1. clicking the "QSO Info" panel's Begin button

2. striking ALT-B in the Main window

3. sending a macro that includes an <RSTsent> or tx_serial_number> command

Before I email you an instrumented version of WinWarbler to see what's
causing the QSO to be started when you double-click a spot database entry,
please reconfirm that the "set QSO start when RST Rcvd" option is disabled
on the Log tab of WinWarbler's Config window. Thanks...

73,

Dave, AA6YQ

-----Original Message-----
From: dxlab@... [mailto:dxlab@...]On Behalf Of Jim
Besancon
Sent: Tuesday, September 08, 2009 6:09 PM
To: dxlab@...
Subject: RE: [dxlab] BEGIN MACRO Request or Did I Miss This Also?


Dave

The start tine appears in red font to the right of "QSO Info [Receive Pane
0]" in WW. It shows up immediately after double clicking a spot in SC to
populate WW.

I also noticed that I am getting a new QSO (all red) in DXK Log QSO's window
at the same time. However, it clears, removes itself, when I clear WW.

I have a Word document of screen shots that I can send direct if you wish.

73 - Jim - K8SIA



-----Original Message-----
From: Dave AA6YQ [mailto:aa6yq@...]
Sent: Monday, September 07, 2009 7:06 PM
To: dxlab@...
Subject: RE: [dxlab] BEGIN MACRO Request or Did I Miss This Also?

When a QSO's start time is set, it appears in red font to the right of the
words "QSO Info" on DXKeeper's Main window. Click the Begin button so you'll
see what I mean.

Now click the X button to clear the QSO Info panel, and then slowly repeat
the procedure you've been using. At what point is the QSO start time set?

73,

Dave, AA6YQ

-----Original Message-----
From: dxlab@... [mailto:dxlab@...]On Behalf Of Jim
Besancon
Sent: Monday, September 07, 2009 4:54 PM
To: dxlab@...
Subject: RE: [dxlab] BEGIN MACRO Request or Did I Miss This Also?



Answers/Comments

If you want your RST items initialized to but don't want the QSO's start
time set when you capture a callsign, disable "set QSO start when RST
Rcvd". -

This is my setup. I have "set QSO start when RST Rcvd" unchecked and
"initialize RST items to
default" checked.

Note that if you log a QSO without having clicked the Begin button,
WinWarbler will record the QSO's start and end times as the time at which
you clicked the Log button (or executed the Log macro command).

I just clicked 3A2MD at 2045 and walked away from computer. I came back hit
my log macro F key and then looked in the DXK log file. The Q start time was
2045 and the Q end time was 2050.

73 - Jim - K8SIA



-----Original Message-----
From: Dave AA6YQ [mailto:aa6yq@...]
Sent: Monday, September 07, 2009 4:31 PM
To: dxlab@...
Subject: RE: [dxlab] BEGIN MACRO Request or Did I Miss This Also?

AA6YQ comments below


-----Original Message-----
From: dxlab@... [mailto:dxlab@...]On Behalf Of Jim
Besancon
Sent: Monday, September 07, 2009 4:16 PM
To: dxlab@...
Subject: [dxlab] BEGIN MACRO Request or Did I Miss This Also?


Situation: Click on spot or find station in pile up and start entry (enter
call sign) in WW. I then use TAB to see if I should proceed with chasing the
station. The QSO Started At Date/Time appears in red above call sign in WW.

Problem: I don't always get the station for several minutes and when I do,
it is a mad click to hit the BEGIN button and then the F Key to send my
report.

Is there or can there be a <begin> macro that can be placed in a F Key
function to reset the start time of the QSO? I can't find one in the list of
macros.

By default, a QSO's start time is set when you click the Main window's
"QSO Info" panel's Begin button.

On the Config window's Log tab, enabling the "set QSO start when RST
Rcvd" option means that a QSO's start time will be set when you specify its
"RST Rcvd" item, either by typing a report into the Main windows' "Log QSOs"
tab, or by double-clicking a received signal report.

On the Config window's Log tab, there is also an "initialize RST items to
default" option. If you enable this option and have also enabled "set QSO
start when RST Rcvd", then when you type a callsign into the "QSO Info"
window or double-click a decoded callsign

1. the "RST Rcvd" item is initialized to the default

2. the QSO's start time is set (because the "RST Rcvd" was recorded and you
have "set QSO start when RST Rcvd" enabled

If you want your RST items initialized to but don't want the QSO's start
time set when you capture a callsign, disable "set QSO start when RST
Rcvd".

Note that if you log a QSO without having clicked the Begin button,
WinWarbler will record the QSO's start and end times as the time at which
you clicked the Log button (or executed the Log macro command).


I will bet that the group will be glad when today is over :)

Not at all, Jim. Providing answers to questions is one of the fundamental
purposes of this group. .

73,

Dave, AA6YQ



------------------------------------

Yahoo! Groups Links





------------------------------------

Yahoo! Groups Links



No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 8.5.339 / Virus Database: 270.13.74/2339 - Release Date: 09/07/09
06:40:00



------------------------------------

Yahoo! Groups Links





------------------------------------

Yahoo! Groups Links



No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 8.5.339 / Virus Database: 270.13.74/2339 - Release Date: 09/08/09
06:48:00
Re: Pathfinder - not working..

N1BAA - Jose Castillo
 

For what it is worth...
Pathfinder is working well here and enters data into Capture window just fine!

Jose - N1BAA


Tom Roberts wrote:

Dear Dave:
I am not running Buckmaster - the buttons on the Pathfinder manually all work well, however it will not fill in Call Data on DXKeeper when I hit the enter button or the CBA..Each time It comes up on the QRZ Menu concerning the updates.. I did insert the Information as requested in the QRZ Config Window. I was unaware of any changes to QRZ until the failure occur ed..I can only hope I have completed the updates required? There fore
if you could advise - I would be grateful..Tom..
--- On Tue, 9/8/09, aa6yq <aa6yq@... <mailto:aa6yq%40ambersoft.com>> wrote:
From: aa6yq <aa6yq@... <mailto:aa6yq%40ambersoft.com>>
Subject: [dxlab] Re: Pathfinder - not working..
To: dxlab@... <mailto:dxlab%40yahoogroups.com>
Date: Tuesday, September 8, 2009, 3:53 PM
If your Buckmaster search button is not working, the problem cannot be the recent changes in QRZ.com .
When you started Pathfinder sometime over the past two weeks, it notified you that a new version of the QRZ search file was available; when you clicked its Update button, Pathfinder downloaded and installed this updated QRZ search file. This is the same search file that I and everyone else is successfully using to access QRZ.com via Pathfinder's QRZ search button.
Do any of Pathfinder's other search buttons work?
73,
Dave, AA6YQ
--- In dxlab@yahoogroups. com, Tom Roberts <ac5rd@...> wrote:
>
> Dear Dave:
> I have made no changes in firewall - Internet for months..Furthermore
I just
> shut down my security - Firewall - still the same - it comes up to the
> QRZ Page..OOPS that Page was not found on QRZ.. then suggests
>
> If you were looking for a call sign using a direct link, please note
that our policy on direct links has changed.
>
> See the article here.
> Also, see: Linking to QRZ
> Tom
> I
>
> --- On Tue, 9/8/09, aa6yq <aa6yq@...> wrote:
>
>
> From: aa6yq <aa6yq@...>
> Subject: [dxlab] Re: Pathfinder - not working..
> To: dxlab@yahoogroups. com
> Date: Tuesday, September 8, 2009, 10:35 AM
>
>
>
>
>
> >>>AA6YQ comments below
>
> --- In dxlab@yahoogroups. com, Tom Roberts <ac5rd@> wrote:
>
> Your Call, comes up with out error on both the QRZ and Buck, however
when the calls are entered through the DXKeeper it states "No Call Found".
> Sorry I did not give you all the information you required and be more
specific in regards to my problem.
> I am certain it is due to the new QRZ Software in place. It occurred
at that time.
>
> >>>I disagree, Tom. Pathfinder is working correctly here.
Furthermore, a change in the QRZ web site would not cause your Buckmaster Hamcall search to suddenly stop working. My suspicion is that your Firewall (or some other anti-malware application) is preventing Pathfinder from accessing the internet.
>
> 73,
>
> Dave, AA6YQ
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

157061 - 157080 of 229239