开云体育

ctrl + shift + ? for shortcuts
© 2025 Groups.io

Herschel Objects


 

开云体育

A few years ago, I completed my decades-long project to observe the objects discovered by William Herschel. As part of that effort, I compiled the attached spreadsheet that contains extensive data on the Herschel objects.? It occurs to me that it may be of interest to some on this list.? It took considerable effort to compile and I’d be pleased if someone can make use of it.

?

The information comes from a number of sources including the websites of Wolfgang Steinicke, Harold Corwin, and Steve Gottlieb as well as Greg Crinklaw’s Sky Tools program. Any errors are mine.

?

Below is a description of what is contained in the spreadsheet:

?

Tab: LIST contains data for 2,517 objects that William Herschel discovered or independently found, including descriptions.

?

Tab: Non-Existent lists the 106 or so Herschel objects that the NGC lists as non-existent with explanations for that designation and current status based on the research of Steinicke, Corwin, and Gottlieb, and a few others.?

?

Tab: Steinicke Add are the objects not generally attributed to Herschel that probably should be included based on the research of Wolfgang Steinicke.

?

Tab: Stars are those supposedly nebulous Herschel objects that are just stars.

?

Tab: Discovery lists the discovery date referenced to the Herschel catalog and NGC designations

?

Tab: Notes contains information on the Herschel catalogs and object classifications and several other pertinent data such as the original discovery data (for objects for which Herschel does not have primacy). It also contains some extensive notes (Steve Gottlieb’s summaries) for Herschel discovered objects without Herschel designations. There are also statistical summaries and notes on duplications and other anomalies in the catalogs.

?

Tab: Abbreviations lists the standard NGC/IC abbreviations used for the object descriptions in the spreadsheet.

?

Tab: A.L. List is the data on the 2,381 (now 2,379) objects that the Astronomical League recognizes as legitimate Herschel objects for their Herschel Society certificates. The objects in the “Herschel 400” and “Herschel II” are identified as are the 74 objects discovered in a single night (April 11, 1785) that constitute the “Herschel Hustle”.??

?

I logged my first Herschel object on February 3, 1992 using an 8-inch SCT from Virginia Beach, VA, and the last one on March 30, 2019 with my 30-inch from my observatory outside of Sierra Vista AZ.? The 27-year span is misleading as it really didn’t become a goal to observe the whole list until about 2015 or so.? It was actually a consequence of my larger (still ongoing) effort to view all the NGC and IC objects visible from my home observatory.?

?

Ted Forte

Herschel 400 Program certificate #298 June 4, 2004 (400 objects)

Herschel II Program certificate #48 September 25, 2006 (400 additional objects)

Herschel Society Silver Certificate August, 26, 2018 (1,200 objects total)

Herschel Society Gold Certificate April 9, 2019 (2,379 objects total)

?


 

I see that you observed 69 objects with your 8" SCT.?
I will check those against my logs and add any that are missing to my TODO list to see how many I'll be able to see over the next few years!
Sometimes we treat lists like this as infallible and your comments about the "anomalies" in the list were very interesting.? ?
Thank you Ted!


 

开云体育

Thanks Jonathan.

?

You’ll see that all of the objects done with the 8-inch were in the 90’s when that SCT was my primary scope.? I wasn’t making any statement as to what is or isn’t visible at that aperture.? There are many more Herschel objects that should be visible in an 8-inch that I never got around to trying.

?

As our mutual friend Mark O is fond of saying, you can’t get a ticket for trying.

?

Ted

?

?

From: [email protected] <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Jonathan Scheetz via groups.io
Sent: Monday, April 7, 2025 6:43 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [BackBayAstro] Herschel Objects

?

I see that you observed 69 objects with your 8" SCT.?

I will check those against my logs and add any that are missing to my TODO list to see how many I'll be able to see over the next few years!

Sometimes we treat lists like this as infallible and your comments about the "anomalies" in the list were very interesting.? ?

Thank you Ted!


 

That's true! Emoji

On Monday, April 7, 2025 at 10:34:18 AM EDT, Ted Forte via groups.io <tedforte511@...> wrote:


Thanks Jonathan.

?

You’ll see that all of the objects done with the 8-inch were in the 90’s when that SCT was my primary scope.? I wasn’t making any statement as to what is or isn’t visible at that aperture.? There are many more Herschel objects that should be visible in an 8-inch that I never got around to trying.

?

As our mutual friend Mark O is fond of saying, you can’t get a ticket for trying.

?

Ted

?

?

From: [email protected] <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Jonathan Scheetz via groups.io
Sent: Monday, April 7, 2025 6:43 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [BackBayAstro] Herschel Objects

?

I see that you observed 69 objects with your 8" SCT.?

I will check those against my logs and add any that are missing to my TODO list to see how many I'll be able to see over the next few years!

Sometimes we treat lists like this as infallible and your comments about the "anomalies" in the list were very interesting.? ?

Thank you Ted!


 

It is quite an achievement. The entire business is bottomless. I just finished reading what was considered the standard reference work (up to 1950's) on the history of the telescope by H.C. King. At the heading of the last chapter is:

"In whatever directions the professional of the future may be forced to develop his methods, we may be confident that the great company of amateurs will never allow visual observations to become a lost art."
W.H. Stevenvenson

On Monday, April 7, 2025 at 10:34:18 AM EDT, Ted Forte via groups.io <tedforte511@...> wrote:


Thanks Jonathan.

?

You’ll see that all of the objects done with the 8-inch were in the 90’s when that SCT was my primary scope.? I wasn’t making any statement as to what is or isn’t visible at that aperture.? There are many more Herschel objects that should be visible in an 8-inch that I never got around to trying.

?

As our mutual friend Mark O is fond of saying, you can’t get a ticket for trying.

?

Ted

?

?

From: [email protected] <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Jonathan Scheetz via groups.io
Sent: Monday, April 7, 2025 6:43 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [BackBayAstro] Herschel Objects

?

I see that you observed 69 objects with your 8" SCT.?

I will check those against my logs and add any that are missing to my TODO list to see how many I'll be able to see over the next few years!

Sometimes we treat lists like this as infallible and your comments about the "anomalies" in the list were very interesting.? ?

Thank you Ted!


 

开云体育

That’s still true today. I wonder for how much longer, though. ?

?

From: [email protected] <[email protected]> On Behalf Of jimcoble2000 via groups.io
Sent: Monday, April 7, 2025 7:48 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [BackBayAstro] Herschel Objects

?

It is quite an achievement. The entire business is bottomless. I just finished reading what was considered the standard reference work (up to 1950's) on the history of the telescope by H.C. King. At the heading of the last chapter is:

?

"In whatever directions the professional of the future may be forced to develop his methods, we may be confident that the great company of amateurs will never allow visual observations to become a lost art."

W.H. Stevenvenson

?

On Monday, April 7, 2025 at 10:34:18 AM EDT, Ted Forte via groups.io <tedforte511@...> wrote:

?

?

Thanks Jonathan.

?

You’ll see that all of the objects done with the 8-inch were in the 90’s when that SCT was my primary scope.? I wasn’t making any statement as to what is or isn’t visible at that aperture.? There are many more Herschel objects that should be visible in an 8-inch that I never got around to trying.

?

As our mutual friend Mark O is fond of saying, you can’t get a ticket for trying.

?

Ted

?

?

From: [email protected] <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Jonathan Scheetz via groups.io
Sent: Monday, April 7, 2025 6:43 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [BackBayAstro] Herschel Objects

?

I see that you observed 69 objects with your 8" SCT.?

I will check those against my logs and add any that are missing to my TODO list to see how many I'll be able to see over the next few years!

Sometimes we treat lists like this as infallible and your comments about the "anomalies" in the list were very interesting.? ?

Thank you Ted!


 

I reconciled my logged observations against your 8" SCT observations and of the 69 I had already observed 43 of them.?
I was hoping for a little better coverage than that after seven? years of observing with my scope.
I understand you that many more in your list are probably observable in my scope.? And I have a very long to do list already.
But, when I hear that someone has already observed something in an 8" scope I always take that as a challenge and give it multiple tries until I see it.
I've thinking of considering working on the Herschel 400 list but a 10" scope is recommended and I've been looking at 12" DOBs for backyard observing.
But, I think that purchase is still a ways off there is still plenty to see with my 8" that I haven't seen yet!
But...


 

Me too....................................

On Monday, April 7, 2025 at 10:51:46 AM EDT, Ted Forte via groups.io <tedforte511@...> wrote:


That’s still true today. I wonder for how much longer, though. ?

?

From: [email protected] <[email protected]> On Behalf Of jimcoble2000 via groups.io
Sent: Monday, April 7, 2025 7:48 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [BackBayAstro] Herschel Objects

?

It is quite an achievement. The entire business is bottomless. I just finished reading what was considered the standard reference work (up to 1950's) on the history of the telescope by H.C. King. At the heading of the last chapter is:

?

"In whatever directions the professional of the future may be forced to develop his methods, we may be confident that the great company of amateurs will never allow visual observations to become a lost art."

W.H. Stevenvenson

?

On Monday, April 7, 2025 at 10:34:18 AM EDT, Ted Forte via groups.io <tedforte511@...> wrote:

?

?

Thanks Jonathan.

?

You’ll see that all of the objects done with the 8-inch were in the 90’s when that SCT was my primary scope.? I wasn’t making any statement as to what is or isn’t visible at that aperture.? There are many more Herschel objects that should be visible in an 8-inch that I never got around to trying.

?

As our mutual friend Mark O is fond of saying, you can’t get a ticket for trying.

?

Ted

?

?

From: [email protected] <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Jonathan Scheetz via groups.io
Sent: Monday, April 7, 2025 6:43 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [BackBayAstro] Herschel Objects

?

I see that you observed 69 objects with your 8" SCT.?

I will check those against my logs and add any that are missing to my TODO list to see how many I'll be able to see over the next few years!

Sometimes we treat lists like this as infallible and your comments about the "anomalies" in the list were very interesting.? ?

Thank you Ted!


 

Visual observing, from a scientific view, mostly ended as a significant contributor to the science? in the mid to late 19th century or early 20th century as astrohysics became more the dominant method of astronomy. Of course there were exceptions contributed by amateurs and others but this became the exception rather than the rule. But there is still value in visual work from a personal satisfaction aspect and contributions within an amateur's grasp. It would be a shame to lose the art form; and it is an art form, gained over many nights of considerable effort. That is good enough for me. History and tradition do count.

I still love to occasionally? use my 70 year old, F/13, planetary refractor, vice my modern scopes, which are a lot easier to use, on many nights of lunar or planetary observing. Keeps you in touch with where we came from. Seeing the quality of the optics in the old scope makes you also appreciate the old style craftsmen and their pride of product before the factory system and mass production. They are gone now but their creations live on. Same for visual work. It's good to keep the old ways alive while we can.

On Monday, April 7, 2025 at 10:51:46 AM EDT, Ted Forte via groups.io <tedforte511@...> wrote:


That’s still true today. I wonder for how much longer, though. ?

?

From: [email protected] <[email protected]> On Behalf Of jimcoble2000 via groups.io
Sent: Monday, April 7, 2025 7:48 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [BackBayAstro] Herschel Objects

?

It is quite an achievement. The entire business is bottomless. I just finished reading what was considered the standard reference work (up to 1950's) on the history of the telescope by H.C. King. At the heading of the last chapter is:

?

"In whatever directions the professional of the future may be forced to develop his methods, we may be confident that the great company of amateurs will never allow visual observations to become a lost art."

W.H. Stevenvenson

?

On Monday, April 7, 2025 at 10:34:18 AM EDT, Ted Forte via groups.io <tedforte511@...> wrote:

?

?

Thanks Jonathan.

?

You’ll see that all of the objects done with the 8-inch were in the 90’s when that SCT was my primary scope.? I wasn’t making any statement as to what is or isn’t visible at that aperture.? There are many more Herschel objects that should be visible in an 8-inch that I never got around to trying.

?

As our mutual friend Mark O is fond of saying, you can’t get a ticket for trying.

?

Ted

?

?

From: [email protected] <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Jonathan Scheetz via groups.io
Sent: Monday, April 7, 2025 6:43 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [BackBayAstro] Herschel Objects

?

I see that you observed 69 objects with your 8" SCT.?

I will check those against my logs and add any that are missing to my TODO list to see how many I'll be able to see over the next few years!

Sometimes we treat lists like this as infallible and your comments about the "anomalies" in the list were very interesting.? ?

Thank you Ted!


 

开云体育

Nothing wrong with doing science, of course, and imaging is a popular hobby (I would argue that imagers do photography not amateur astronomy) but what has always attracted me to the hobby is the visceral appreciation of celestial objects by viewing them with your own eyes.?

?

Stop and think of how personal that is. The actual photons that hit your retina are yours alone – no one else ever has or ever will absorb those particular quanta of light. We can internalize it if we care to, it actually becomes part of us. Consider also that when we view a celestial object the way the visual discoverers did, we see it as they did. We become the latest in a direct line of individuals that have enjoyed that particular experience. For many objects, the line of observers is actually rather short, we are privileged to be among a very select group of humans.

?

I greatly enjoy viewing the objects that were discovered visually, through the eyepiece of some intrepid astronomer of bygone centuries. I feel a bond with these great observes of the past. There is a real romance to it, a sense of communion with a long dead kindred spirit. (Fun to contemplate on a long lonely night - or ARE you alone?)

?

I also find it fascinating to learn about those discoverers. Sir William was just one.? You can pretty much assume that anytime you view an NGC object you are viewing something that was discovered by eye, through an eyepiece. Only one NGC object, NGC 1432 (the nebula around the Pleiades), was discovered on a photographic plate, and another 22 were discovered using a spectroscope, but the rest of the 7,052 independent non stellar objects in the NGC were discovered visually, by about a 100 observers. Most of them have interesting stories.?

?

If no one is still looking a century from now, we will have lost something precious and particularly human. I’m rather glad I won’t be around for it.

?

Ted

?

?

From: [email protected] <[email protected]> On Behalf Of jimcoble2000 via groups.io
Sent: Monday, April 7, 2025 8:58 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [BackBayAstro] Herschel Objects

?

Visual observing, from a scientific view, mostly ended as a significant contributor to the science? in the mid to late 19th century or early 20th century as astrohysics became more the dominant method of astronomy. Of course there were exceptions contributed by amateurs and others but this became the exception rather than the rule. But there is still value in visual work from a personal satisfaction aspect and contributions within an amateur's grasp. It would be a shame to lose the art form; and it is an art form, gained over many nights of considerable effort. That is good enough for me. History and tradition do count.

?

I still love to occasionally? use my 70 year old, F/13, planetary refractor, vice my modern scopes, which are a lot easier to use, on many nights of lunar or planetary observing. Keeps you in touch with where we came from. Seeing the quality of the optics in the old scope makes you also appreciate the old style craftsmen and their pride of product before the factory system and mass production. They are gone now but their creations live on. Same for visual work. It's good to keep the old ways alive while we can.

?

On Monday, April 7, 2025 at 10:51:46 AM EDT, Ted Forte via groups.io <tedforte511@...> wrote:

?

?

That’s still true today. I wonder for how much longer, though. ?

?

From: [email protected] <[email protected]> On Behalf Of jimcoble2000 via groups.io
Sent: Monday, April 7, 2025 7:48 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [BackBayAstro] Herschel Objects

?

It is quite an achievement. The entire business is bottomless. I just finished reading what was considered the standard reference work (up to 1950's) on the history of the telescope by H.C. King. At the heading of the last chapter is:

?

"In whatever directions the professional of the future may be forced to develop his methods, we may be confident that the great company of amateurs will never allow visual observations to become a lost art."

W.H. Stevenvenson

?

On Monday, April 7, 2025 at 10:34:18 AM EDT, Ted Forte via groups.io <tedforte511@...> wrote:

?

?

Thanks Jonathan.

?

You’ll see that all of the objects done with the 8-inch were in the 90’s when that SCT was my primary scope.? I wasn’t making any statement as to what is or isn’t visible at that aperture.? There are many more Herschel objects that should be visible in an 8-inch that I never got around to trying.

?

As our mutual friend Mark O is fond of saying, you can’t get a ticket for trying.

?

Ted

?

?

From: [email protected] <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Jonathan Scheetz via groups.io
Sent: Monday, April 7, 2025 6:43 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [BackBayAstro] Herschel Objects

?

I see that you observed 69 objects with your 8" SCT.?

I will check those against my logs and add any that are missing to my TODO list to see how many I'll be able to see over the next few years!

Sometimes we treat lists like this as infallible and your comments about the "anomalies" in the list were very interesting.? ?

Thank you Ted!


 

On Mon, Apr 7, 2025 at 10:19 AM, Ted Forte wrote:
"I greatly enjoy viewing the objects that were discovered visually, through the eyepiece of some intrepid astronomer of bygone centuries."
I absolutely agree.? I like to think about Messier and others sitting out in the cold under the stars looking for comets and wondering what those little fuzzies were.
In a similar vein, what sailors in the "Olden Days" were able to accomplish in their small boats astound me.
The that John Smith made of Virginia still amazes me - when I had my boat I tried to recreate his travels as much as I could.
I saw the recreation of the he used when making his map in rough water crossing the opening of the Monitor Merrimac Bridge and later had a close look at it at the Chesapeake Bay Maritime Museum.? I visited the island where he was "supposedly" captured by the Powhatan Indians.? Of course all of this interest was aroused by the celebration of Jamestown's 400th anniversary.
... oops, side tracked ...
Anyway, I enjoy looking things in the sky and thinking of how long they've been looked at by the Greeks, Egyptians and seventeenth century astronomers.?
Pictures are nice but they don't give me the same thrill.
?
It's a great hobby.
?


 

开云体育

Holy crap that is a lot of info!

?

v/r

?

?-??---?Gone...

?-??-??-?

?

From: <[email protected]> on behalf of "Ted Forte via groups.io" <tedforte511@...>
Reply-To: <[email protected]>
Date: Sunday, April 6, 2025 at 10:47?AM
To: <tedforte511@...>
Subject: [BackBayAstro] Herschel Objects
Resent-From: <tedforte511@...>
Resent-Date: Sun, 06 Apr 2025 09:47:51 -0700

?

A few years ago, I completed my decades-long project to observe the objects discovered by William Herschel. As part of that effort, I compiled the attached spreadsheet that contains extensive data on the Herschel objects.? It occurs to me that it may be of interest to some on this list.? It took considerable effort to compile and I’d be pleased if someone can make use of it.

?

The information comes from a number of sources including the websites of Wolfgang Steinicke, Harold Corwin, and Steve Gottlieb as well as Greg Crinklaw’s Sky Tools program. Any errors are mine.

?

Below is a description of what is contained in the spreadsheet:

?

Tab: LIST contains data for 2,517 objects that William Herschel discovered or independently found, including descriptions.

?

Tab: Non-Existent lists the 106 or so Herschel objects that the NGC lists as non-existent with explanations for that designation and current status based on the research of Steinicke, Corwin, and Gottlieb, and a few others.?

?

Tab: Steinicke Add are the objects not generally attributed to Herschel that probably should be included based on the research of Wolfgang Steinicke.

?

Tab: Stars are those supposedly nebulous Herschel objects that are just stars.

?

Tab: Discovery lists the discovery date referenced to the Herschel catalog and NGC designations

?

Tab: Notes contains information on the Herschel catalogs and object classifications and several other pertinent data such as the original discovery data (for objects for which Herschel does not have primacy). It also contains some extensive notes (Steve Gottlieb’s summaries) for Herschel discovered objects without Herschel designations. There are also statistical summaries and notes on duplications and other anomalies in the catalogs.

?

Tab: Abbreviations lists the standard NGC/IC abbreviations used for the object descriptions in the spreadsheet.

?

Tab: A.L. List is the data on the 2,381 (now 2,379) objects that the Astronomical League recognizes as legitimate Herschel objects for their Herschel Society certificates. The objects in the “Herschel 400” and “Herschel II” are identified as are the 74 objects discovered in a single night (April 11, 1785) that constitute the “Herschel Hustle”.??

?

I logged my first Herschel object on February 3, 1992 using an 8-inch SCT from Virginia Beach, VA, and the last one on March 30, 2019 with my 30-inch from my observatory outside of Sierra Vista AZ.? The 27-year span is misleading as it really didn’t become a goal to observe the whole list until about 2015 or so.? It was actually a consequence of my larger (still ongoing) effort to view all the NGC and IC objects visible from my home observatory.?

?

Ted Forte

Herschel 400 Program certificate #298 June 4, 2004 (400 objects)

Herschel II Program certificate #48 September 25, 2006 (400 additional objects)

Herschel Society Silver Certificate August, 26, 2018 (1,200 objects total)

Herschel Society Gold Certificate April 9, 2019 (2,379 objects total)

?


--

v/r

v/r

Chuck Jagow

Future ???????

Gone... ??????

?

?


 

That’s quite a list, Ted. You and I enjoyed viewing some of those objects from Coinjock back in the day. Thank you for your many contributions to our hobby through the years.
?
I have always liked Herschel’s method of using abbreviation in his descriptions. I “borrowed” his method for many years. Before the days of typing logs on a PC, and now a smartphone I wrote those abbreviations directly on my printed star maps in as tiny print as I could to squeeze it all in. I can tell that was a long time ago because the print is so small on those maps that I can no longer read them, even with reading glasses. Ah, the perils of aging.
?
Kent Blackwell?


 

开云体育

I remember seeing your two copies of Uranometria so full of fly speck notes that it was difficult to see the plotted objects. Inspiring.

?

We had some great times in Coinjock, didn’t we? I’ll never forget the night a couple of campers stopped by the cedars and you showed them something in the 25. The husband climbed the ladder first and put his eye to the eyepiece with its dew heater right at the top, and he gasped, ?and called to his wife … “ Martha, this gets you so close, you can feel the HEAT from these stars!”

?

I mostly remember those nights when I’d leave there in the wee hours for the hour drive back to Virginia Beach. ?The startling sight of the crescent moon rising over the Currituck sound as I left the cedars was exhilarating. ?More than enough to keep me stoked all the way home. ?I can close my eyes even now and see that view as if it was this morning!

?

Ted

?

?

?

From: [email protected] <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Kent Blackwell via groups.io
Sent: Wednesday, April 9, 2025 3:51 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [BackBayAstro] Herschel Objects

?

That’s quite a list, Ted. You and I enjoyed viewing some of those objects from Coinjock back in the day. Thank you for your many contributions to our hobby through the years.

?

I have always liked Herschel’s method of using abbreviation in his descriptions. I “borrowed” his method for many years. Before the days of typing logs on a PC, and now a smartphone I wrote those abbreviations directly on my printed star maps in as tiny print as I could to squeeze it all in. I can tell that was a long time ago because the print is so small on those maps that I can no longer read them, even with reading glasses. Ah, the perils of aging.

?

Kent Blackwell?


 

Happy times

On Wednesday, April 9, 2025 at 09:08:10 AM EDT, Ted Forte via groups.io <tedforte511@...> wrote:


I remember seeing your two copies of Uranometria so full of fly speck notes that it was difficult to see the plotted objects. Inspiring.

?

We had some great times in Coinjock, didn’t we? I’ll never forget the night a couple of campers stopped by the cedars and you showed them something in the 25. The husband climbed the ladder first and put his eye to the eyepiece with its dew heater right at the top, and he gasped, ?and called to his wife … “ Martha, this gets you so close, you can feel the HEAT from these stars!”

?

I mostly remember those nights when I’d leave there in the wee hours for the hour drive back to Virginia Beach. ?The startling sight of the crescent moon rising over the Currituck sound as I left the cedars was exhilarating. ?More than enough to keep me stoked all the way home. ?I can close my eyes even now and see that view as if it was this morning!

?

Ted

?

?

?

From: [email protected] <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Kent Blackwell via groups.io
Sent: Wednesday, April 9, 2025 3:51 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [BackBayAstro] Herschel Objects

?

That’s quite a list, Ted. You and I enjoyed viewing some of those objects from Coinjock back in the day. Thank you for your many contributions to our hobby through the years.

?

I have always liked Herschel’s method of using abbreviation in his descriptions. I “borrowed” his method for many years. Before the days of typing logs on a PC, and now a smartphone I wrote those abbreviations directly on my printed star maps in as tiny print as I could to squeeze it all in. I can tell that was a long time ago because the print is so small on those maps that I can no longer read them, even with reading glasses. Ah, the perils of aging.

?

Kent Blackwell?