Keyboard Shortcuts
ctrl + shift + ? :
Show all keyboard shortcuts
ctrl + g :
Navigate to a group
ctrl + shift + f :
Find
ctrl + / :
Quick actions
esc to dismiss
Likes
Search
Dale Carey's Binoc's (long)
Hi all,
I wanted to make a quick note about the Barska 15X70's Rick Bish originally asked about. After seeing Rob's pair at a recent club meeting and hearing how much they cost (~$85 shipped if I remember), I couldn't resist and ordered a pair from Heartland America's web site. His may have had a different brand name than Barska, I don't remember, but come from the same far east (or Russian?) factory I'm pretty sure. I have long wanted to pick up a similar sized pair of Fuji's, but always seemed to have something better to do with the >$500 they cost. I used to have a pair of Celestron 20X80's (still do actually), but the focuser mechanism pretty much just disoved on me a few years ago and I never got them fixed. They were so heavy, you really had to have a tripod and I didn't use them much. My Barska's took about a week to show up at my door, which was sooner than Heartland said they would be there. Out of the box, they looked just fine, but were a bit out of colimation for my eyes. I had read a web site about lining its two scopes up and quickly had the problem fixed. I would rather have them out of line with a way to adjust than have them perfect with no way to adjust, so I was happy. My Celestron 20X80's also came out of alignment after years of use, but I don't know how to adjust them (very anoying). In the short time since aligning my Barska's, they have kept their alignment well. My impression so far using them has been very favorable. They have great light grasp, far above that of my Orion 10X50 Vista's. Their exit pupil is in the sweet spot for my eyes between 4 and 5 mm, and so the images are both bright and sharp. For my 42 year old eyes, greater than 5mm and I start to get astigmatic effects. Image sharpness accross the entire field is superior to my Orion Vista's. There is only a little degredation at the outer 5 deg or so of the field and it is not enough to notice unless you go looking for it. The field itself is quite wide. I do not know what it is, but would guess it's pushing 60 deg. The central sharpness is not high-end refractor sharp, but is still excellent and good enough for me to be able to make a clear oval out of Saturn. Overall, they are probably the best binoculars I have ever owned. Mind you I am not a bino connoisseur. However, I have generally been disapointed with most binoculars I have owned regarding their optical quality. That may have to do with my refusal, so far, to spend as much on them as I would a scope (or Nagler). I have been thrilled with the performance of my Barska 15X70's though. I would have been happy with them even had I paid between $300 and $400 ( don't tell Heartland!). Also, they are light enough I can hold them for short periods with good effect, especially if I brace my arms on something. A couple of last notes. Their coatings apear to be standard MgFl (not multicoated). With 70mm lenses, this is probably not too important and as I said the images are quite bright. I remember no ghosting or obvious false color either. The focus mechanism has Chinese style goo grease that turns to glue when it gets cold. I cleaned as much off as I could and relubed with some teflon grease and they are much better. Took about a minute. They come with caps, a soft case and the obligatory wiping cloth (throw it out, use kleenex or an old white T-shirt that has been through the wash a few hundred times). I don't much care for the eyelens cap. Notice I made the word "cap" singular. It is an oval shaped thing you have to push over both eyepieces at the same time. I'm a bit clumsy I admit, but I have a hard time with this for some reason. Lastly, if you order from Heartland America over their web site, expect to get junk e-mail from them for the rest of your life. In fairness, I could probably tell them to quit, but I like seeing all the other stuff they sell real cheap too. All in all, I would recommend these binos to most anybody, especially for the price. Richard --- In backbayastro@..., George Reynolds <pathfinder027@y...> wrote: market for a pair, the Orion 8x42, normally selling for $139, is on sale on the "Clearance" page on Orion's Web site for $111.20. Georgemade by Adlerblick, as are the top on the line Celestron's. Adlerblick (German for eagle-eye) is a little-known optical company, which is a division of Carton. They utilize BAK-4 glass which has a very high refractive index. I have a pair of 10x50 Adlerblicks and are optically superb. They are about the lightest 10x50's out there, but seem a bit fragile to me. I have had to collimate them twice in their lifetime. Isn't it amazing?...I have a pair of US-made Bausch & Lomb's, made in 1942 which have NEVER slipped out of collimation. They are simply dazzling, both optically and mechanically. I think the B&Ls knock the pants off any other glass I've seen. And they made it through a World War unscathed. I've always been an advocate that a high degree of polish on a lens is more important than fancy multi-coatings. The B&L are very heavily coated with a deep purple magnesizm fluoride, which predates multi-coatings by 40 years. The Germans actually invented lens coatings, but leave it to the good ole fellas at Bausch & Lomb to come up with a coating that didn't wear off. The German binoculars in the era after 1941 were coated, but only the inside surfaces because they were not "hard coated". If you cats out there really want a super pair of binoculars check out Pentax's image-stabilized models. The 10x30 are highly recommended, not very expensive and light as a feather. Because of their stabilization, I can see stars every bit as faint with the 10x30 as with the non-stabilized 10x50 Adlerblicks, despite the fact the 50mm objectives of the Adlerblicks gather 2.8x more light! To add to their strengths the Canon's are very good optically. Stars are pinpoints nearly to the edge of the field. Please don't get me started talking about binoculars. I love them. Kent Blackwell Check out these sites: ----- Original Message ----- From: George Reynolds To: backbayastro@... Sent: Thursday, February 27, 2003 9:26 AMSubject: Re: [backbayastro] Dale Carey's Binoc's is the Orion 8x42 Ultraview. Here is something I wrote a while back, and it still holds: Alan Adler's great article on binoculars in the September, 2002issue hit the mark for me. I had a cheap pair of Simmons 10x50's ($24.95 at Wal-Mart) and last year, on the strength of Alan Adler's review in a link off the Todd Gross Weatherman web site*, I purchased a pair of Orion Ultra-View 8x42 binos and use them regularly in my observing. I enjoy the bino views of M6, M7, M45 (The Pleiades), the Double Cluster in Perseus and of course, M31 The Great Andromeda Galaxy, as well as just wandering through the Milky Way. I also use them consistently to find targets to point my scope at. I wish my finder scope had the good contrast the Ultra-Views have. Alan could have included "8x42" in his "Astro Index" table on page 96. It would fall between the 7x50 and 9x63 binos, with an astro index of 50.
were you able to use the Barska 15 X 70's much before the flood hit Tidewater? I believe you were the one who got a good dealnot much of an "equipment person" though they might come in handy inRangers
Rangers
|
Well, I'm impressed with you opinion of those Chinese binoculars. Most of
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
the early Japanese and current Chinese's units are packed with stiff grease for a very good reason; to take up slack in poor machining of the focus mechanism. My experience has been remove that thick grease, and excess play becomes a major factor. I warn others about doing so. Apparently your 10x70s are machined well enough you didn't have the problem. I'd like to see a return of individual focus eyepieces in binoculars, especially for astronomical use. Focus them once for your eyes and be done with it. With individual focus models even inexpensive binoculars can be made virtually waterproof, or at least water & dust, resistant. Kent Blackwell ----- Original Message -----
From: <dickson@...> To: <backbayastro@...> Sent: Friday, February 28, 2003 9:34 AM Subject: [backbayastro] Re: Dale Carey's Binoc's (long) Hi all, |
to navigate to use esc to dismiss