Keyboard Shortcuts
Likes
- BackBayAstro
- Messages
Search
Re: Herschel Objects
开云体育Holy crap that is a lot of info! ? v/r ? ?-??---?Gone... ?-??-??-? ? From: <[email protected]> on behalf of "Ted Forte via groups.io" <tedforte511@...> ? A few years ago, I completed my decades-long project to observe the objects discovered by William Herschel. As part of that effort, I compiled the attached spreadsheet that contains extensive data on the Herschel objects.? It occurs to me that it may be of interest to some on this list.? It took considerable effort to compile and I’d be pleased if someone can make use of it. ? The information comes from a number of sources including the websites of Wolfgang Steinicke, Harold Corwin, and Steve Gottlieb as well as Greg Crinklaw’s Sky Tools program. Any errors are mine. ? Below is a description of what is contained in the spreadsheet: ? Tab: LIST contains data for 2,517 objects that William Herschel discovered or independently found, including descriptions. ? Tab: Non-Existent lists the 106 or so Herschel objects that the NGC lists as non-existent with explanations for that designation and current status based on the research of Steinicke, Corwin, and Gottlieb, and a few others.? ? Tab: Steinicke Add are the objects not generally attributed to Herschel that probably should be included based on the research of Wolfgang Steinicke. ? Tab: Stars are those supposedly nebulous Herschel objects that are just stars. ? Tab: Discovery lists the discovery date referenced to the Herschel catalog and NGC designations ? Tab: Notes contains information on the Herschel catalogs and object classifications and several other pertinent data such as the original discovery data (for objects for which Herschel does not have primacy). It also contains some extensive notes (Steve Gottlieb’s summaries) for Herschel discovered objects without Herschel designations. There are also statistical summaries and notes on duplications and other anomalies in the catalogs. ? Tab: Abbreviations lists the standard NGC/IC abbreviations used for the object descriptions in the spreadsheet. ? Tab: A.L. List is the data on the 2,381 (now 2,379) objects that the Astronomical League recognizes as legitimate Herschel objects for their Herschel Society certificates. The objects in the “Herschel 400” and “Herschel II” are identified as are the 74 objects discovered in a single night (April 11, 1785) that constitute the “Herschel Hustle”.?? ? I logged my first Herschel object on February 3, 1992 using an 8-inch SCT from Virginia Beach, VA, and the last one on March 30, 2019 with my 30-inch from my observatory outside of Sierra Vista AZ.? The 27-year span is misleading as it really didn’t become a goal to observe the whole list until about 2015 or so.? It was actually a consequence of my larger (still ongoing) effort to view all the NGC and IC objects visible from my home observatory.? ? Ted Forte Herschel 400 Program certificate #298 June 4, 2004 (400 objects) Herschel II Program certificate #48 September 25, 2006 (400 additional objects) Herschel Society Silver Certificate August, 26, 2018 (1,200 objects total) Herschel Society Gold Certificate April 9, 2019 (2,379 objects total) ? -- v/r v/r Chuck Jagow
Future ??????? Gone... ?????? ? ? |
Re: Herschel Objects
On Mon, Apr 7, 2025 at 10:19 AM, Ted Forte wrote:
"I greatly enjoy viewing the objects that were discovered visually, through the eyepiece of some intrepid astronomer of bygone centuries."I absolutely agree.? I like to think about Messier and others sitting out in the cold under the stars looking for comets and wondering what those little fuzzies were. In a similar vein, what sailors in the "Olden Days" were able to accomplish in their small boats astound me.
The that John Smith made of Virginia still amazes me - when I had my boat I tried to recreate his travels as much as I could.
I saw the recreation of the he used when making his map in rough water crossing the opening of the Monitor Merrimac Bridge and later had a close look at it at the Chesapeake Bay Maritime Museum.? I visited the island where he was "supposedly" captured by the Powhatan Indians.? Of course all of this interest was aroused by the celebration of Jamestown's 400th anniversary.
... oops, side tracked ...
Anyway, I enjoy looking things in the sky and thinking of how long they've been looked at by the Greeks, Egyptians and seventeenth century astronomers.?
Pictures are nice but they don't give me the same thrill.
?
It's a great hobby.
? |
Re: Herschel Objects
开云体育Nothing wrong with doing science, of course, and imaging is a popular hobby (I would argue that imagers do photography not amateur astronomy) but what has always attracted me to the hobby is the visceral appreciation of celestial objects by viewing them with your own eyes.? ? Stop and think of how personal that is. The actual photons that hit your retina are yours alone – no one else ever has or ever will absorb those particular quanta of light. We can internalize it if we care to, it actually becomes part of us. Consider also that when we view a celestial object the way the visual discoverers did, we see it as they did. We become the latest in a direct line of individuals that have enjoyed that particular experience. For many objects, the line of observers is actually rather short, we are privileged to be among a very select group of humans. ? I greatly enjoy viewing the objects that were discovered visually, through the eyepiece of some intrepid astronomer of bygone centuries. I feel a bond with these great observes of the past. There is a real romance to it, a sense of communion with a long dead kindred spirit. (Fun to contemplate on a long lonely night - or ARE you alone?) ? I also find it fascinating to learn about those discoverers. Sir William was just one.? You can pretty much assume that anytime you view an NGC object you are viewing something that was discovered by eye, through an eyepiece. Only one NGC object, NGC 1432 (the nebula around the Pleiades), was discovered on a photographic plate, and another 22 were discovered using a spectroscope, but the rest of the 7,052 independent non stellar objects in the NGC were discovered visually, by about a 100 observers. Most of them have interesting stories.? ? If no one is still looking a century from now, we will have lost something precious and particularly human. I’m rather glad I won’t be around for it. ? Ted ? ? From: [email protected] <[email protected]> On Behalf Of jimcoble2000 via groups.io
Sent: Monday, April 7, 2025 8:58 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [BackBayAstro] Herschel Objects ? Visual observing, from a scientific view, mostly ended as a significant contributor to the science? in the mid to late 19th century or early 20th century as astrohysics became more the dominant method of astronomy. Of course there were exceptions contributed by amateurs and others but this became the exception rather than the rule. But there is still value in visual work from a personal satisfaction aspect and contributions within an amateur's grasp. It would be a shame to lose the art form; and it is an art form, gained over many nights of considerable effort. That is good enough for me. History and tradition do count. ? I still love to occasionally? use my 70 year old, F/13, planetary refractor, vice my modern scopes, which are a lot easier to use, on many nights of lunar or planetary observing. Keeps you in touch with where we came from. Seeing the quality of the optics in the old scope makes you also appreciate the old style craftsmen and their pride of product before the factory system and mass production. They are gone now but their creations live on. Same for visual work. It's good to keep the old ways alive while we can. ? On Monday, April 7, 2025 at 10:51:46 AM EDT, Ted Forte via groups.io <tedforte511@...> wrote: ? ? That’s still true today. I wonder for how much longer, though. ? ? From: [email protected] <[email protected]> On Behalf Of jimcoble2000 via groups.io ? It is quite an achievement. The entire business is bottomless. I just finished reading what was considered the standard reference work (up to 1950's) on the history of the telescope by H.C. King. At the heading of the last chapter is: ? "In whatever directions the professional of the future may be forced to develop his methods, we may be confident that the great company of amateurs will never allow visual observations to become a lost art." W.H. Stevenvenson ? On Monday, April 7, 2025 at 10:34:18 AM EDT, Ted Forte via groups.io <tedforte511@...> wrote: ? ? Thanks Jonathan. ? You’ll see that all of the objects done with the 8-inch were in the 90’s when that SCT was my primary scope.? I wasn’t making any statement as to what is or isn’t visible at that aperture.? There are many more Herschel objects that should be visible in an 8-inch that I never got around to trying. ? As our mutual friend Mark O is fond of saying, you can’t get a ticket for trying. ? Ted ? ? From: [email protected] <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Jonathan Scheetz via groups.io ? I see that you observed 69 objects with your 8" SCT.? I will check those against my logs and add any that are missing to my TODO list to see how many I'll be able to see over the next few years! Sometimes we treat lists like this as infallible and your comments about the "anomalies" in the list were very interesting.? ? Thank you Ted! |
Re: Herschel Objects
Visual observing, from a scientific view, mostly ended as a significant contributor to the science? in the mid to late 19th century or early 20th century as astrohysics became more the dominant method of astronomy. Of course there were exceptions contributed by amateurs and others but this became the exception rather than the rule. But there is still value in visual work from a personal satisfaction aspect and contributions within an amateur's grasp. It would be a shame to lose the art form; and it is an art form, gained over many nights of considerable effort. That is good enough for me. History and tradition do count. I still love to occasionally? use my 70 year old, F/13, planetary refractor, vice my modern scopes, which are a lot easier to use, on many nights of lunar or planetary observing. Keeps you in touch with where we came from. Seeing the quality of the optics in the old scope makes you also appreciate the old style craftsmen and their pride of product before the factory system and mass production. They are gone now but their creations live on. Same for visual work. It's good to keep the old ways alive while we can.
On Monday, April 7, 2025 at 10:51:46 AM EDT, Ted Forte via groups.io <tedforte511@...> wrote:
That’s still true today. I wonder for how much longer, though. ? ? From: [email protected] <[email protected]> On Behalf Of jimcoble2000 via groups.io
Sent: Monday, April 7, 2025 7:48 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [BackBayAstro] Herschel Objects ? It is quite an achievement. The entire business is bottomless. I just finished reading what was considered the standard reference work (up to 1950's) on the history of the telescope by H.C. King. At the heading of the last chapter is: ? "In whatever directions the professional of the future may be forced to develop his methods, we may be confident that the great company of amateurs will never allow visual observations to become a lost art." W.H. Stevenvenson ? On Monday, April 7, 2025 at 10:34:18 AM EDT, Ted Forte via groups.io <tedforte511@...> wrote: ? ? Thanks Jonathan. ? You’ll see that all of the objects done with the 8-inch were in the 90’s when that SCT was my primary scope.? I wasn’t making any statement as to what is or isn’t visible at that aperture.? There are many more Herschel objects that should be visible in an 8-inch that I never got around to trying. ? As our mutual friend Mark O is fond of saying, you can’t get a ticket for trying. ? Ted ? ? From: [email protected] <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Jonathan Scheetz via groups.io ? I see that you observed 69 objects with your 8" SCT.? I will check those against my logs and add any that are missing to my TODO list to see how many I'll be able to see over the next few years! Sometimes we treat lists like this as infallible and your comments about the "anomalies" in the list were very interesting.? ? Thank you Ted! |
Re: Herschel Objects
Me too....................................
On Monday, April 7, 2025 at 10:51:46 AM EDT, Ted Forte via groups.io <tedforte511@...> wrote:
That’s still true today. I wonder for how much longer, though. ? ? From: [email protected] <[email protected]> On Behalf Of jimcoble2000 via groups.io
Sent: Monday, April 7, 2025 7:48 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [BackBayAstro] Herschel Objects ? It is quite an achievement. The entire business is bottomless. I just finished reading what was considered the standard reference work (up to 1950's) on the history of the telescope by H.C. King. At the heading of the last chapter is: ? "In whatever directions the professional of the future may be forced to develop his methods, we may be confident that the great company of amateurs will never allow visual observations to become a lost art." W.H. Stevenvenson ? On Monday, April 7, 2025 at 10:34:18 AM EDT, Ted Forte via groups.io <tedforte511@...> wrote: ? ? Thanks Jonathan. ? You’ll see that all of the objects done with the 8-inch were in the 90’s when that SCT was my primary scope.? I wasn’t making any statement as to what is or isn’t visible at that aperture.? There are many more Herschel objects that should be visible in an 8-inch that I never got around to trying. ? As our mutual friend Mark O is fond of saying, you can’t get a ticket for trying. ? Ted ? ? From: [email protected] <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Jonathan Scheetz via groups.io ? I see that you observed 69 objects with your 8" SCT.? I will check those against my logs and add any that are missing to my TODO list to see how many I'll be able to see over the next few years! Sometimes we treat lists like this as infallible and your comments about the "anomalies" in the list were very interesting.? ? Thank you Ted! |
Re: Herschel Objects
I reconciled my logged observations against your 8" SCT observations and of the 69 I had already observed 43 of them.?
I was hoping for a little better coverage than that after seven? years of observing with my scope.
I understand you that many more in your list are probably observable in my scope.? And I have a very long to do list already.
But, when I hear that someone has already observed something in an 8" scope I always take that as a challenge and give it multiple tries until I see it.
I've thinking of considering working on the Herschel 400 list but a 10" scope is recommended and I've been looking at 12" DOBs for backyard observing.
But, I think that purchase is still a ways off there is still plenty to see with my 8" that I haven't seen yet!
But... |
Re: Herschel Objects
开云体育That’s still true today. I wonder for how much longer, though. ? ? From: [email protected] <[email protected]> On Behalf Of jimcoble2000 via groups.io
Sent: Monday, April 7, 2025 7:48 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [BackBayAstro] Herschel Objects ? It is quite an achievement. The entire business is bottomless. I just finished reading what was considered the standard reference work (up to 1950's) on the history of the telescope by H.C. King. At the heading of the last chapter is: ? "In whatever directions the professional of the future may be forced to develop his methods, we may be confident that the great company of amateurs will never allow visual observations to become a lost art." W.H. Stevenvenson ? On Monday, April 7, 2025 at 10:34:18 AM EDT, Ted Forte via groups.io <tedforte511@...> wrote: ? ? Thanks Jonathan. ? You’ll see that all of the objects done with the 8-inch were in the 90’s when that SCT was my primary scope.? I wasn’t making any statement as to what is or isn’t visible at that aperture.? There are many more Herschel objects that should be visible in an 8-inch that I never got around to trying. ? As our mutual friend Mark O is fond of saying, you can’t get a ticket for trying. ? Ted ? ? From: [email protected] <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Jonathan Scheetz via groups.io ? I see that you observed 69 objects with your 8" SCT.? I will check those against my logs and add any that are missing to my TODO list to see how many I'll be able to see over the next few years! Sometimes we treat lists like this as infallible and your comments about the "anomalies" in the list were very interesting.? ? Thank you Ted! |
Re: Herschel Objects
It is quite an achievement. The entire business is bottomless. I just finished reading what was considered the standard reference work (up to 1950's) on the history of the telescope by H.C. King. At the heading of the last chapter is: "In whatever directions the professional of the future may be forced to develop his methods, we may be confident that the great company of amateurs will never allow visual observations to become a lost art." W.H. Stevenvenson
On Monday, April 7, 2025 at 10:34:18 AM EDT, Ted Forte via groups.io <tedforte511@...> wrote:
Thanks Jonathan. ? You’ll see that all of the objects done with the 8-inch were in the 90’s when that SCT was my primary scope.? I wasn’t making any statement as to what is or isn’t visible at that aperture.? There are many more Herschel objects that should be visible in an 8-inch that I never got around to trying. ? As our mutual friend Mark O is fond of saying, you can’t get a ticket for trying. ? Ted ? ? From: [email protected] <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Jonathan Scheetz via groups.io
Sent: Monday, April 7, 2025 6:43 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [BackBayAstro] Herschel Objects ? I see that you observed 69 objects with your 8" SCT.? I will check those against my logs and add any that are missing to my TODO list to see how many I'll be able to see over the next few years! Sometimes we treat lists like this as infallible and your comments about the "anomalies" in the list were very interesting.? ? Thank you Ted! |
Re: Herschel Objects
That's true! ![]()
On Monday, April 7, 2025 at 10:34:18 AM EDT, Ted Forte via groups.io <tedforte511@...> wrote:
Thanks Jonathan. ? You’ll see that all of the objects done with the 8-inch were in the 90’s when that SCT was my primary scope.? I wasn’t making any statement as to what is or isn’t visible at that aperture.? There are many more Herschel objects that should be visible in an 8-inch that I never got around to trying. ? As our mutual friend Mark O is fond of saying, you can’t get a ticket for trying. ? Ted ? ? From: [email protected] <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Jonathan Scheetz via groups.io
Sent: Monday, April 7, 2025 6:43 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [BackBayAstro] Herschel Objects ? I see that you observed 69 objects with your 8" SCT.? I will check those against my logs and add any that are missing to my TODO list to see how many I'll be able to see over the next few years! Sometimes we treat lists like this as infallible and your comments about the "anomalies" in the list were very interesting.? ? Thank you Ted! |
Re: Herschel Objects
开云体育Thanks Jonathan. ? You’ll see that all of the objects done with the 8-inch were in the 90’s when that SCT was my primary scope.? I wasn’t making any statement as to what is or isn’t visible at that aperture.? There are many more Herschel objects that should be visible in an 8-inch that I never got around to trying. ? As our mutual friend Mark O is fond of saying, you can’t get a ticket for trying. ? Ted ? ? From: [email protected] <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Jonathan Scheetz via groups.io
Sent: Monday, April 7, 2025 6:43 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [BackBayAstro] Herschel Objects ? I see that you observed 69 objects with your 8" SCT.? I will check those against my logs and add any that are missing to my TODO list to see how many I'll be able to see over the next few years! Sometimes we treat lists like this as infallible and your comments about the "anomalies" in the list were very interesting.? ? Thank you Ted! |
Re: Herschel Objects
I see that you observed 69 objects with your 8" SCT.?
I will check those against my logs and add any that are missing to my TODO list to see how many I'll be able to see over the next few years!
Sometimes we treat lists like this as infallible and your comments about the "anomalies" in the list were very interesting.? ?
Thank you Ted! |
Herschel Objects
开云体育A few years ago, I completed my decades-long project to observe the objects discovered by William Herschel. As part of that effort, I compiled the attached spreadsheet that contains extensive data on the Herschel objects.? It occurs to me that it may be of interest to some on this list.? It took considerable effort to compile and I’d be pleased if someone can make use of it. ? The information comes from a number of sources including the websites of Wolfgang Steinicke, Harold Corwin, and Steve Gottlieb as well as Greg Crinklaw’s Sky Tools program. Any errors are mine. ? Below is a description of what is contained in the spreadsheet: ? Tab: LIST contains data for 2,517 objects that William Herschel discovered or independently found, including descriptions. ? Tab: Non-Existent lists the 106 or so Herschel objects that the NGC lists as non-existent with explanations for that designation and current status based on the research of Steinicke, Corwin, and Gottlieb, and a few others.? ? Tab: Steinicke Add are the objects not generally attributed to Herschel that probably should be included based on the research of Wolfgang Steinicke. ? Tab: Stars are those supposedly nebulous Herschel objects that are just stars. ? Tab: Discovery lists the discovery date referenced to the Herschel catalog and NGC designations ? Tab: Notes contains information on the Herschel catalogs and object classifications and several other pertinent data such as the original discovery data (for objects for which Herschel does not have primacy). It also contains some extensive notes (Steve Gottlieb’s summaries) for Herschel discovered objects without Herschel designations. There are also statistical summaries and notes on duplications and other anomalies in the catalogs. ? Tab: Abbreviations lists the standard NGC/IC abbreviations used for the object descriptions in the spreadsheet. ? Tab: A.L. List is the data on the 2,381 (now 2,379) objects that the Astronomical League recognizes as legitimate Herschel objects for their Herschel Society certificates. The objects in the “Herschel 400” and “Herschel II” are identified as are the 74 objects discovered in a single night (April 11, 1785) that constitute the “Herschel Hustle”.?? ? I logged my first Herschel object on February 3, 1992 using an 8-inch SCT from Virginia Beach, VA, and the last one on March 30, 2019 with my 30-inch from my observatory outside of Sierra Vista AZ.? The 27-year span is misleading as it really didn’t become a goal to observe the whole list until about 2015 or so.? It was actually a consequence of my larger (still ongoing) effort to view all the NGC and IC objects visible from my home observatory.? ? Ted Forte Herschel 400 Program certificate #298 June 4, 2004 (400 objects) Herschel II Program certificate #48 September 25, 2006 (400 additional objects) Herschel Society Silver Certificate August, 26, 2018 (1,200 objects total) Herschel Society Gold Certificate April 9, 2019 (2,379 objects total) ? |
Re: https://www.stellar-events.org/chesapeake-bay-stargazing-cruises / Scam?
Hi, Scott! No worries about not being seen lately - you are always welcome! As for this website, I have not seen it before but they do seem pretty fishy to me.? A lot of discussion on various subreddits discuss them as scammers, with a 1.4 star review on TripAdvisor with similar discussion.? I'd steer clear, though I think Jeff found a whale-watching group that is star friendly. Jeremy On Fri, Apr 4, 2025 at 3:54?PM celldaws via <celldaws=[email protected]> wrote:
|
https://www.stellar-events.org/chesapeake-bay-stargazing-cruises / Scam?
Hey all.? I'm one of the group members who hasn't shown up in a while, so if you don't recognize my name that's understandable.? I need some help:? A friend keeps telling me I should book a "stargazing trip" with the subject website, but something feels off about it, much like how a scam presents online.? Are you familiar with this site?? Thanks.
?
-Scott Cadwell
celldaws@... |
BBAA Meeting Zoom Link 4-3-25
Here is the zoom link for those who wish to attend tonight's meeting remotely?
?
Richard Roberts is inviting you to a scheduled Zoom meeting.
Topic: BBAA Meeting
Time: Apr 3, 2025 07:30 PM Eastern Time (US and Canada) ? ? ? ? Every month on the First Thu, until Apr 2, 2026, 13 occurrence(s) Please download and import the following iCalendar (.ics) files to your calendar system. Monthly: https://us06web.zoom.us/meeting/tZYrcuCsrzIqGtbq0KWBV25JEbU6csIcs3G6/ics?icsToken=DD5TeBkgeufy8tH0MwAALAAAAJXMOljXXs5DwcMUh8vszrvFJKZ-JuEEoZbKc9nchKcL3bozrV9ABH8jLgx-ShJ4oIQ5rr28dCgoP6QlrjAwMDAwMQ Join Zoom Meeting https://us06web.zoom.us/j/82659419002?pwd=TJ96jGZPb3q2rk4rBhncVaCeAam0g5.1 Meeting ID: 826 5941 9002
Passcode: 471443 ---
?
|
Re: BBAA April 2025 Update
Jeremy Thank you for the email.? Appreciate your sharing club news, events and updates. ? Roland On Tue, Apr 1, 2025 at 9:36?PM Jeremy via <jsaria=[email protected]> wrote:
|
Re: BBAA April 2025 Update
Thank you to Jeremy for all of the cooking he did while at the ECSP.
?
In addition to the Recognizing A Ranger we ( the ECSP committee) would appreciate the feedback of the attendees. You can follow this link: to access a Google Form. Also please feel free to share any and all photos you would like on the club's Google Drive at the same link. Thank you.
?
Shawn |
BBAA April 2025 Update
Good evening, friends, and welcome to April!
?
We just had a great East Coast Star Party - and that's no fooling!? Special thanks to:
- Bruce Powers for chairing the ECSP Committee (herding cats in straight lines), obtaining some amazing prizes for the picnic, and coordinating the phenomenal restoration of power to the field and the new restroom!
- Shawn Loescher for being the on-the-spot go-to mover and shaker in getting the field setup and keeping the whole event running smoothly and keeping me sane while we tried to figure out what "endless hotdogs" looked like.
- Jeff Goldstein for his exceptional prowess as our Italian chef and single-handedly pulling off the reprise of the spaghetti dinner!
- Rich Roberts for quietly and patiently supporting the committee's antics, processing an embarrassing?number of small receipts, and swooping in to snatch victory from the jaws of a port-o-potty company's poor communication.
- Kent Blackwell, for starting a legendary party and inspiring a small army to attempt to pull off what he managed on his own!
- Our hosts, Park Manager Trevor Johnston for helping arrange the Party and getting the repairs done, Ranger Joel Morris for supporting a public night of over 50 visitors, and Ranger John Savage for ensuring our spaces were setup, clean, and ready for us!? If you haven't already, please consider recognizing one (or all) of them at:?.
?
This week, we will have our monthly club meeting at TCC Virginia Beach's Science Building.? In addition to the usual excitement of business matters, observing reports (including those from the Star Party!) and door prizes, we have two additional key points:
- Our own Vice President, Jeff Goldstein, will be sharing his formidable skills as an Astronomer Outreach coordinator and educator par excellence to teach a topic on Planning and Executing Astronomy Outreach
- The Georgie June Scholarship raffle drawing will take place!? As a reminder, tickets will still be available for $5 each up until the drawing, with a prize of a Celestron StarSense 114AZ newtonian reflector and equipped with a solar filter, a zoom eyepiece and other neat accessories!? After the raffle, we'll still happily accept $5 in exchange for commemorative tickets.
?
Upcoming Club and Outreach Events:
- 2 Apr (6pm):? Malibu Elementary School Science Night
- 3 Apr (7:30pm):? Club Meeting at TCC Virginia Beach
- 8 Apr (8:30pm):? Garden Stars at Norfolk Botanical Gardens
- 9 Apr (7:45pm):? Astronomy 101 at Kempsville Rec Center
- 11 Apr (11am):? STEM Day at Deep Creek Elementary School
- 12 Apr (10am):? Saturday SUNday at Elizabeth River Park
- 18 Apr (7:30pm):? Cornwatch at Cornland Park
- 19 Apr (7:45pm):? Skywatch at Northwest River Park
- 19 Apr (6pm):? Earth Day Movie Night at New Quarter Park (Williamsburg, VA)
- 25 Apr (7:45pm):? Cornwatch at Cornland Park (Yes, TWO this month!)
- 26 Apr (7:45pm):? Nightwatch at Chippokes State Park
?
Upcoming Astronomical Events:
- 10 Apr:? Venus becomes stationary, then resumes prograde motion
- 22 Apr:? Peak of the Lyrids
- 27 Apr:? Venus (morning star) at maximum illumination
?
I strongly encourage anyone who is able to make it to go to an outreach event or two.? Even the newest amateur astronomer can help share your love of the skies and enjoy the warmth of someone else's wonder!
?
Eyes up and clear skies!
?
Jeremy
|
Re: Thanks for the nice star party and thanks to those who made it happen.
开云体育Thank you, Shawn.? I had the QR code and was about to post it, when I saw your link.? This is even better. I recognized Trevor Johnston and Danielle Hedgpeth for their actions during the ECSP.? I hope others will recognize Trevor for his outstanding assistance. ? Jeff G? BBAA VP ? From: [email protected] <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Shawn Loescher via groups.io
Sent: Tuesday, April 1, 2025 8:32 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [BackBayAstro] Thanks for the nice star party and thanks to those who made it happen. ? You're welcome and thanks for coming out. Here is a link to the Recognize A Ranger page: . |
Re: Thanks for the nice star party and thanks to those who made it happen.
Thanks for the link, Shawn.? Here is the text of my kudos for Ranger Trevor: "As usual, Trevor went out of his way to accommodate the East Coast Star Party and the members of the Back Bay Amateur Astronomers.? His over-and-above effort to make the restroom in the barn functional and available to us was wonderful, and very much appreciated.? Also, his spotting of the tardy Port-a-Johns from Spivey is appreciated.? The gas grill was excellent, and made our Saturday cookout possible.? And thank you for setting up the tent and canopy and for providing plenty of trash bins and bags.? Ranger Trevor Johnston deserves our gratitude in a big way.? Thank you!" George George Reynolds "Solar System Ambassador" for South Hampton Roads, Virginia Back Bay Amateur Astronomers (BBAA)? ?
On Tuesday, April 1, 2025 at 08:32:00 AM EDT, Shawn Loescher via groups.io <shawn.loescher@...> wrote:
You're welcome and thanks for coming out. Here is a link to the Recognize A Ranger page: https://www.dcr.virginia.gov/state-parks/other/customer-service.
|