¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

Date

Re: Harbor freight 8x12 lathe (cheap digital calipers)

 

--- In 7x12minilathe@..., "Aaron Pasteris"
<aarons_groups@...> wrote:

Solder + 5-minute epoxy = instant connector
Hi Aaron,

Don't worry. I've yet to be defeated by a mere connector. I was just
hoping to flush out a more kosher solution!

John


Re: Taper - I think I have a problem?!

wrlabs
 

--- In 7x12minilathe@..., "steam4ian" <fosterscons@...>
wrote:

G'day John, Vikki.
I think I may have raised the issue of the coarseness of the LMS
mod..

If you do the mod using a 6mm screw then the thread pitch is 1.0mm.
One turn of the nut/screw moves the TS 1mm or 40thou. Add in backlash
in the nut, screw and bracket and you are left with a very touchy
adjustment.
Touchier than what I am doing now ?!? Seems it would have to be an
improvement for the front to back adjustment whatever it was. No way
that I can see to do that with the stock arrangement other than screwing
with it until you hit it (been doing that all night :-).

If you put the adjuster in the back access is restricted by the cam
lock modification. If you put it on the front it risks fouling the
compound slide.
I may well hold off on that one until, at least, I get the cam lock in
place and see what I have there.

Lathes like the Southbend (and the Hercuses I know) have screws on
opposite sides of the TS foot which engage a tongue in the TS body
(or is it the other way round). Tightening these screws against each
other gives a very fine adjustment because you use the spring in the
screws and naturally takes out the backlash.
LOL, at the moment I I'm wishing I had one of those ;-)!

I have looked at an adaption of the the LMS mod to use two nuts which
tighten against the bracket, the problem is access restrictions
caused by the cam lock.

Here is a case where I would be happy to be proved wrong!
I'm certainly not going to be the one that does it, I don't think :).

BTW; LMS have again served me well, goods arrived in under 7 working
days from US to Oz.
Done well in getting stuff to me quickly enough too.

I'm been working at getting this under control all evening. I'm about
at the point where I call it good enough, I think.

Got the DI in the chuck reading zero top and bottom and under 0.001 on
the front and back.

Interestingly, measuring from front of the quill (zero) to the back I am
off by about 0.003, seems that with the DI reading I shouldn't have that
?!?

Now to get if off of there and tighten down the SHCS on the bottom
without buggering it :-/. The thought that the Chinese hate us has
occured to me ;-) LOL!

Enough for tonight !

Thanks & take care, Vikki.


Re: Taper - I think I have a problem?!

 

G'day John, Vikki.
I think I may have raised the issue of the coarseness of the LMS
mod..

If you do the mod using a 6mm screw then the thread pitch is 1.0mm.
One turn of the nut/screw moves the TS 1mm or 40thou. Add in backlash
in the nut, screw and bracket and you are left with a very touchy
adjustment.
If you put the adjuster in the back access is restricted by the cam
lock modification. If you put it on the front it risks fouling the
compound slide.

Lathes like the Southbend (and the Hercuses I know) have screws on
opposite sides of the TS foot which engage a tongue in the TS body
(or is it the other way round). Tightening these screws against each
other gives a very fine adjustment because you use the spring in the
screws and naturally takes out the backlash.

I have looked at an adaption of the the LMS mod to use two nuts which
tighten against the bracket, the problem is access restrictions
caused by the cam lock.

Here is a case where I would be happy to be proved wrong!

BTW; LMS have again served me well, goods arrived in under 7 working
days from US to Oz.

One good turn deserves another.
Regards,
Ian
--- In 7x12minilathe@..., "born4something" <ajs@...>
wrote:



--- In 7x12minilathe@..., "wrlabs" <wrlabs@> wrote:

This mod also looks like a really wise idea for a number of
reasons:

<>


Hi Vikki,

Just a word of caution.

I thought this was a brilliant idea too and was going to make one.
Then
someone posted a negative comment here about it. I can't recall
what the
issue was now. Perhaps someone will fess up to the comment? It may
have
been the thread pitch being too coarse or something. That's
addressable
but I'd look at it closely before taking the LMS sketch at face
value.

John



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]


Re: Homier 7x12 electronic question

rikissme
 

Thanks for the advice, I called homier today and their tech support
is supposed to contact me within 48 hours ... I'll keep you posted.

Ricky

--- In 7x12minilathe@..., "John Ruge" <jruge@...> wrote:

I got the Homier a couple of years ago. The first time I fired it
up, it ran noticably
slower in reverse than forward. I called Homier & asked about it,
and they said
that the speed should be the same both ways. Whether or not that's
true, they
sent me a replacement controller board (no charge, and they didn't
ask for the
original back), and forward & reverse appear to be the same now. It
might be
worth a call. (From what I remember, the board didn't arrive that
quickly. Maybe
3-4 weeks.)

John


----- Original Message -----
From: John
To: 7x12minilathe@...
Sent: Sunday, March 25, 2007 6:49 PM
Subject: [7x12minilathe] Re: Homier 7x12 electronic question


Welcome to the group, someone here should be able to answer your
question.

The controller normally provides reduced drive for reverse. When
the
switch is in the Rev position, is the spindle actually turning
backwards? (One possibility on a new machine is that the motor
wiring is hooked up backwards...)

John

--- In 7x12minilathe@..., "rikissme" <rikissme@>
wrote:
>
> Hello all,
> I've been lurking on this group for sometime while waiting to
get a
> lathe and have finally bought the 7x12 from homier. I'm excited
about
> learning how to use it but I seem to have a problem. The lathe
runs
> smoothly in reverse but chugs along in the forward position.
>
> I removed the cover where the switches are and put an ohm meter
on what
> appears to be the main wires on the toggle switch (black for
reverse
> and white for forward - I think). Sure enough, I get a nice
steady
> current when running in reverse and a weaker pulsating current
going
> forward.
>
> Has anyone else in the group had a similar problem or have an
idea how
> to correct this?
>
> Thanks - Rick
>







Re: Bed extention for a micromark 7x14

Mike Payson
 

On 3/26/07, born4something <ajs@...> wrote:
--- In 7x12minilathe@..., "Paul Moir" <paul.moir@...> wrote:

I'm thinking something like rubber pinch rollers from a couple old
cassette players or VCRs or something rather than hard bearings.
Or tape. Have you come across 3M's Scotch brand 5423 UHMW tape? It's a
polyethylene film with rubber adhesive. Pretty handy stuff. Not cheap as
tapes go but it may be cost effective if the alternative is a bed
extension.
Hi John,

Just out of curiosity, how would you use tape in this application? Is
it just to put over the steady rest fingers to prevent marking, or am
I missing something? An d where can you find it? I found one store
online that sells it by the case, but I don't really need $600 worth
of tape right now. Any good sources?

Thanks.


Re: Harbor freight 8x12 lathe (cheap digital calipers)

Druid Noibn
 

Hi John,

I also bought the calipers from 8oowatt but the cheapskate didn't give me all the extra batteries <smile>. In truth, I haven't had a problem with 800watt.

The installed batteries routinely fail - hence the added battey - cheap insurance.

As for the cable - you can get it at LMS - I believe it is item #1990

Some solder the wires in. Also, look at replacing the battery with a small tantalum electrolytic cap. and a ceramic cap. when using the scales with a DRO-350. The DRO supplies the power and the capacitors filter the noise. You could use the battery but it will need to be replaced every so often.

Take care,
DBN

born4something <ajs@...> wrote:
Hi,

Firstly, I should report back on the original topic. I followed up
800watt on eBay and ordered several calipers from him. Yes, he will
ship international on request. As people here said, his
communication is pretty terse and speed is not his forte.

The parcel took 18 days to get to me in Australia. But arrive it did
and the calipers are fine. All 3 managed to turn themselves on in
transit as their hard cases allow enough movement to touch the
buttons on the protective foam - a nick with the penknife will fix
that. They arrived with displays flashing indicating low batteries.
However, each was packed with a spare battery and he threw in a
bonus strip of 5 extra batteries.

Now, who knows how to interface to the data port on these things?
They seem to take some sort of miniature 4-pin plug. What are they
called - anyone got a part number? Anyone know the pinout and data
format?

John

--- In 7x12minilathe@..., "born4something" <ajs@...>
wrote:

Thanks,

Some of 800WATT's listings look pretty good - except he lists as
US
only. :-(

Maybe I'll politely ask.

John


--- In 7x12minilathe@..., Druid Noibn <druid_noibn@>
wrote:

Hi John,

Just two-more-cents-worth...

One might take a quick look on some of the eBay offerings.
For
example, a vendor "800WATT" sells the calipers item at good
prices -
watch the s/h charges however. Also, this vendor has a low score
due to his poor communications style and often a bit long on
delivery time. I've purchased several items from him and all
worked
out well. I've also purchased a larger caliper from Australia and
it arrived faster than the items from the US vendors.

Take care,
DBN


born4something <ajs@> wrote:


Hi,

I see lots of interest in cheap digital calipers - presumeably
for
DRO
mods. Not sure if this helps but there are some at
ID=TD2081&CATID=&keywords=TD208&#92;
1&SPECIAL=&form=KEYWORD&ProdCodeOnly=&Keyword1=&Keyword2=&pageNumber=
&pr&#92;
iceMin=&priceMax=&SUBCATID=
<
ID=TD2081&CATID=&keywords=TD20&#92;
81&SPECIAL=&form=KEYWORD&ProdCodeOnly=&Keyword1=&Keyword2=&pageNumber
=&p&#92;
riceMin=&priceMax=&SUBCATID=> that may be of interest.

Ignore the listed price. I can buy these at Qty 1+ $12.77 Qty 5+
$11.77
Qty 10+ $10.77 (10% GST not inlcluded). The prices are in Aussie
dollars
which sit around the $US0.75 mark. I'd probably wear about $AU12
in
freight to get a delivery to my door.

I haven't physically seen one of these so the catalogue entry is
all I
have. Perhaps a 1-off retail purchase should come first. If
someone
wants to buy some I'm happy to act as middle man. If a few
people
were
closely located a bulk buy may be attractive. Contact me off
list
if
you'd like to explore details.

John
(not associated in any way with the supplier, other than as a
trade
customer).

--- In 7x12minilathe@..., "mrslushy" <MrFrost@>
wrote:

--- In 7x12minilathe@..., "rancerupp" rupps@ wrote:

Chris,

You're not the only one that missed it. However I am about 2
weeks
away
from ordering. I missed the $16 dig. caliper too.

Rance (sittin & watching the prices)

LMS currently has 6" digital caliper for 14.95.....check it
out.







---------------------------------
No need to miss a message. Get email on-the-go
with Yahoo! Mail for Mobile. Get started.







---------------------------------
The fish are biting.
Get more visitors on your site using Yahoo! Search Marketing.


Re: Harbor freight 8x12 lathe (cheap digital calipers)

wrlabs
 

[ .... ]
Hi David,

Thanks for that link. That saves me having to reverse engineer the
data format off the scope. A source of connectors would be nice.
Maybe I need to buy spare parts from a DRO maker.
[ ... ]


Not positive this is what you are looking for, but it looked like it
might be?!?

Not connected in any way to LMS, just they are about all there is :-).

Hope this helps!

Take care, Vikki.


Re: Taper - I think I have a problem?!

Aaron Pasteris
 

The adjuster could be modified to use a differential screw adjustment
External thread the adjuster nut to a 24 pitch and get an ~96 pitch movement (or 40 pitch for a 160 pitch movement)

Aaron

----- Original Message -----
From: born4something
To: 7x12minilathe@...
Sent: Monday, March 26, 2007 9:37 PM
Subject: [7x12minilathe] Re: Taper - I think I have a problem?!




--- In 7x12minilathe@..., "wrlabs" <wrlabs@...> wrote:
>
> This mod also looks like a really wise idea for a number of reasons:
>
>
<>

Hi Vikki,

Just a word of caution.

I thought this was a brilliant idea too and was going to make one. Then
someone posted a negative comment here about it. I can't recall what the
issue was now. Perhaps someone will fess up to the comment? It may have
been the thread pitch being too coarse or something. That's addressable
but I'd look at it closely before taking the LMS sketch at face value.

John


Re: My 8x12 is here :) (Cleaning it up)

Druid Noibn
 

Hi Rance,

Just an FYI..in case you didn't pick up on it earlier... The manual is not 100% accurate <smile>.

The drawings and sizes of the gear hardware, (axels, clip rings, etc...) might not match. Make notes.

Take care,
DBN


rancerupp <rupps@...> wrote:
Thanks for the info. I'll just make my own pan, just wanted to know
if it was missing. Their packing list leaves a lot to be desired.
Same for the manuals. But that's just part of this cheap-lathe-
game. :D

I already got a couple of the cheap oil cans from HF. I can modify
one for the ball valves. Thanks again guys.

--- In 7x12minilathe@..., andrew franks <andyf1108@...>
wrote:

Under a baby lathe which I own, I fitted a ?2/$4 baking tray to act
as a chip pan. At 14", it wouldn't be long enough for the 8x12, but I
wonder if bigger ones are available for commercial bakeries.
Andy


Druid Noibn <druid_noibn@...> wrote:
Hi,

The 8x12 does not come with a chip pan and HF doesn't sell one.

As for the oil valves - HF does have a small pump oiler - I picked
one up at the local store a couple of weeks ago. I'll have to find
the # and post it.

Take care,
DBN





---------------------------------
Never miss an email again!
Yahoo! Toolbar alerts you the instant new Mail arrives. Check it out.


Re: Taper - I think I have a problem?!

 

Hi Vikki
Oops, sorry about misspelling your name. I should have paid closer
attention. (I do suffer from ADD and dain bramage.)
6-32 is a good "starter size" because if this size proves to be too
small or weak for the job (at times I've had to put a lot of torque on
the Tee wrench to get everything perfect on a particular job) it will
be very easy to move up to an 8-32 then 10-32 screw size due to the
common thread pitch; however, 6-32 is VERY course which makes this
size one of the more difficult to cut without breaking a tap.
(Breaking a tap will really ruin your day. 10-32 will prove to be a
much easier size to tap without breakage. That said, cast iron tends
to be an easy material to tap. If you go with 10-32 you'll soon
discover that your 4mm metric Tee driver fits the screw head better
than the 5/32" wrench that 10-32 SHCS's were designed to take.)
Remember that stainless "steel" really isn't steel (it's stainless
iron) and not as strong as your standard black (usually grade 5 or 8)
SHCS's. This is especially true of common 300 series (non-magnetic)
stainless fasteners.
I've never done a camlock conversion although this particular
upgrade will make life much easier. Instead I simply cut a 17mm
combination wrench in two. I use the box end (which is slightly
offset) for tightening my tailstock nut. (My tailstock nut is a 10mm
acorn nut.) The offset box end combined with the acorn nut makes
adjustments "fairly" easy. I was all set to make life much easier and
convert to a camlock but before this happened (I kept putting it off)
I had occasion to drill some very large holes using the tailstock
chuck. I discovered that unless the tailstock base nut was VERY tight,
I would get some tailstock movement/slipage. You can get the tailstock
locked down much tighter using a wrench. (The threading on the base
screw gives you more mechanical advantage than a cam.) If you never
drill holes larger than 1/2", slippage shouldn't be much of a concern
with a camlock. Trying to tighten the tailstock with a straight open
end wrench (like the one that came with the lathe) WILL drive you nuts
quickly. The reason the camlock is so popular is not becasue it saves
your wrist and hand but because it's SO much more accessable. You
don't have to worry about those tricky tightenings when you have to
work around (under) the cross slide dial. This is where having an
offset 12 point box wrench makes things easier but not quite as easy
as a camlock.
I would only make the LMS tailstock adjuster (your included link)
if I had to often offset the tailstock to cut long tapers. This
modification will make it much easier to move the tailstock by minute
amounts but you'll still have to cut test pieces to make sure your
adjustment is perfect. Of course once you get the tailstock adjusted
to zero taper (using any method), you'll likely want to mark the upper
and lower parts of the tailstock (straight chisel mark, two punch
marks or a scribed line) so you can get back to zero (or near zero)
quicker if you do offset the tailstock to cut a long taper. Unless you
need as much space as possible between centers it will be much easier
to do longer tapers (i.e. too long to use the compound) by mounting a
boring head in the tailstock.

Bruce

--- In 7x12minilathe@..., "wrlabs" <wrlabs@...> wrote:

Hello Bruce,

Thanks VERY much for you comments here, after a night to think on the
problem and your comments as well as some from other folks here, I have
a much better head space :-) on the problem!

--- In 7x12minilathe@..., "Bruce Leo Hartmann"
<goodsnout@> wrote:

Vikki,

Not being very bright ot talented, I (correctly) figured I could
never get my headstock and tailstock in perfect allignment But I
figured that even though not understanding all (or any) of the various
published methods of achieving perfection in this area, I could get
close enough (via perseverance and dumb luck) to do acceptable work.
That seems to be where I am at :-).

I lucked out in the first instance by getting a really well made
old style Homier. The old style Homiers and Cummins lathes use two
rear set screws instead of the one central set screw used on the Seig
machines. This difference alone makes the allignment MUCH easier
provided that these set screws are immediately replaced with 6mm
SHCS's. On a seig machine, holes would need to be drilled and taped
for these invaluable "adjustment" screws.
Just went in there and looked at the back of the tailstock and that idea
makes so much sense as to be staggering. I have some 6-32 stainless
screws that I think will work for this and may put this idea into
practice today! Smacking the tailstock back and forth with the jewelers
hammer is an exercise in frustration and does nothing for the paint :-).

Out of PURE frustration (and sore wrists :-), I ordered the cam lock kit
last night from LMS. Cranking that bolt tight and loose is far more of
a job than I want to do constantly in this process (now or in the
future). I'd read in a great number of places that the cam lock is one
of the best mods one can make and I now understand *exactly* why that is
:-).

This mod also looks like a really wise idea for a number of reasons:



With the addition of two screws spaced out on the back and the tailstock
adjuster life should be a LOT easier.

The first step is to get the
allignment "close."
[ ... ]
Rather than commenting (cluelessly :) on the rest of this, I copied it
out and printed it for inclusion into my Shop Notebook to study while I
go through this and future reference. Utterly excellent!

I'm sure this is NOT the professional or approved method of
alligning the head and tailstocks but it has worked very well for me.
As I have heard somewhere, if it is stupid and it works, it is not
stupid :-).

The good news here, I think, is that I am getting over the aversion to
doing anything to the lathe, sorta like the new car syndrome :-).

Thanks VERY much and take care, Vikki.


Re: Harbor freight 8x12 lathe (cheap digital calipers)

Aaron Pasteris
 

Solder + 5-minute epoxy = instant connector

----- Original Message -----
From: born4something
To: 7x12minilathe@...
Sent: Monday, March 26, 2007 8:54 PM
Subject: [7x12minilathe] Re: Harbor freight 8x12 lathe (cheap digital calipers)


Hi David,

Thanks for that link. That saves me having to reverse engineer the
data format off the scope. A source of connectors would be nice.
Maybe I need to buy spare parts from a DRO maker.

Interestingly, I have calipers with two different connector
geometries. Both have the 4 gold-flashed PCB fingers but the
surrounding plastic differs. One is as shown at your link. The other
is more enclosed and clearly needs a differently housed plug. That's
what I love about standards - there's always such variety to choose
from!

John

--- In 7x12minilathe@..., figNoggle <david@...> wrote:
>
>
>
> hi john-
>
> <>
>
> it was nice of the seller to provide extra batteries. going into a
local
> drug store to buy replacements is very pricey.
>
> hope this helps!
> david
>
>
>
> MetalWorkingFAQ.NET - Over 50 content sites!
<>
> CNC, Plans/Kits, 8x12 Lathe, Mini-Mill, How-Tos
<>
> Sieg X3/Super X3 Mill Information, HF/Enco Coupons
<>
>
> On Mon, 26 Mar 2007, born4something wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > Firstly, I should report back on the original topic. I followed
up
> > 800watt on eBay and ordered several calipers from him. Yes, he
will
> > ship international on request. As people here said, his
> > communication is pretty terse and speed is not his forte.
> >
> > The parcel took 18 days to get to me in Australia. But arrive it
did
> > and the calipers are fine. All 3 managed to turn themselves on in
> > transit as their hard cases allow enough movement to touch the
> > buttons on the protective foam - a nick with the penknife will
fix
> > that. They arrived with displays flashing indicating low
batteries.
> > However, each was packed with a spare battery and he threw in a
> > bonus strip of 5 extra batteries.
> >
> >
> > Now, who knows how to interface to the data port on these things?
> > They seem to take some sort of miniature 4-pin plug. What are
they
> > called - anyone got a part number? Anyone know the pinout and
data
> > format?
> >
> > John
> >
> >
> >
> > --- In 7x12minilathe@..., "born4something" <ajs@>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > >
> > > Some of 800WATT's listings look pretty good - except he lists
as
> > US
> > > only. :-(
> > >
> > > Maybe I'll politely ask.
> > >
> > > John
> > >
> > >
> > > --- In 7x12minilathe@..., Druid Noibn
<druid_noibn@>
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Hi John,
> > > >
> > > > Just two-more-cents-worth...
> > > >
> > > > One might take a quick look on some of the eBay offerings.
> > For
> > > example, a vendor "800WATT" sells the calipers item at good
> > prices -
> > > watch the s/h charges however. Also, this vendor has a low
score
> > > due to his poor communications style and often a bit long on
> > > delivery time. I've purchased several items from him and all
> > worked
> > > out well. I've also purchased a larger caliper from Australia
and
> > > it arrived faster than the items from the US vendors.
> > > >
> > > > Take care,
> > > > DBN
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > born4something <ajs@> wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > I see lots of interest in cheap digital calipers -
presumeably
> > for
> > > DRO
> > > > mods. Not sure if this helps but there are some at
> > > >
> > > ID=TD2081&CATID=&keywords=TD208&#92;
> > > >
> > >
> >
1&SPECIAL=&form=KEYWORD&ProdCodeOnly=&Keyword1=&Keyword2=&pageNumber=
> > > &pr&#92;
> > > > iceMin=&priceMax=&SUBCATID=
> > > > <
> > > ID=TD2081&CATID=&keywords=TD20&#92;
> > > >
> > >
> >
81&SPECIAL=&form=KEYWORD&ProdCodeOnly=&Keyword1=&Keyword2=&pageNumber
> > > =&p&#92;
> > > > riceMin=&priceMax=&SUBCATID=> that may be of interest.
> > > >
> > > > Ignore the listed price. I can buy these at Qty 1+ $12.77
Qty 5+
> > > $11.77
> > > > Qty 10+ $10.77 (10% GST not inlcluded). The prices are in
Aussie
> > > dollars
> > > > which sit around the $US0.75 mark. I'd probably wear about
$AU12
> > in
> > > > freight to get a delivery to my door.
> > > >
> > > > I haven't physically seen one of these so the catalogue
entry is
> > > all I
> > > > have. Perhaps a 1-off retail purchase should come first. If
> > someone
> > > > wants to buy some I'm happy to act as middle man. If a few
> > people
> > > were
> > > > closely located a bulk buy may be attractive. Contact me off
> > list
> > > if
> > > > you'd like to explore details.
> > > >
> > > > John
> > > > (not associated in any way with the supplier, other than as a
> > trade
> > > > customer).
> > > >
> > > > --- In 7x12minilathe@..., "mrslushy" <MrFrost@>
> > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > --- In 7x12minilathe@..., "rancerupp" rupps@
wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Chris,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > You're not the only one that missed it. However I am
about 2
> > > weeks
> > > > away
> > > > > > from ordering. I missed the $16 dig. caliper too.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Rance (sittin & watching the prices)
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > LMS currently has 6" digital caliper for 14.95.....check it
> > out.
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > ---------------------------------
> > > > No need to miss a message. Get email on-the-go
> > > > with Yahoo! Mail for Mobile. Get started.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
>


Re: Threading and using the Dial

 

Hi Roy,

I was wondering about utilising the locknut on the end of the
spindle. This would have the advantage of keeping the spindle free
for long jobs. Anyone else looked at this?

John


--- In 7x12minilathe@..., "roylowenthal"
<roylowenthal@...> wrote:

The most common methods use something that expands into the HS
bore,
attached to the actual handcrank. One style uses a diagonally cut
piece that expands into the HS bore when it's tightened; exactly
like
a bicycle handlebar adjuster. The other style uses a double-
expanding concrete anchor to grip the bore. You'll want about a
6"
lever arm with some flavor of knob. If you can get one, an old
valve
handwheel works nicely, as does a defunct ball joint in a piece of
flat stock.



Roy

--- In 7x12minilathe@..., <gregorstransky@> wrote:

Does anybody know a procudure how to make a handcrank? A while
ago
I ran
across a procedure on one of the lathe/minilathe/machining
websites. But I
do not remember any more which website that was.
Thank you.
Gregor Stransky, San Antonio, Texas

----- Original Message -----
From: "roylowenthal" <roylowenthal@>
To: <7x12minilathe@...>
Sent: Sunday, March 25, 2007 9:15 PM
Subject: [7x12minilathe] Re: Threading and using the Dial


The handiest threading accessory you can make is a handcrank!
Particularly on short, shouldered pieces turning the lathe by
hand
gives more torque & much better control.


Re: Taper - I think I have a problem?!

 

--- In 7x12minilathe@..., "wrlabs" <wrlabs@...> wrote:

This mod also looks like a really wise idea for a number of reasons:

<>


Hi Vikki,

Just a word of caution.

I thought this was a brilliant idea too and was going to make one. Then
someone posted a negative comment here about it. I can't recall what the
issue was now. Perhaps someone will fess up to the comment? It may have
been the thread pitch being too coarse or something. That's addressable
but I'd look at it closely before taking the LMS sketch at face value.

John


Re: Bed extention for a micromark 7x14

 

--- In 7x12minilathe@..., "Paul Moir" <paul.moir@...> wrote:

I'm thinking something like rubber pinch rollers from a couple old
cassette players or VCRs or something rather than hard bearings.

Or tape. Have you come across 3M's Scotch brand 5423 UHMW tape? It's a
polyethylene film with rubber adhesive. Pretty handy stuff. Not cheap as
tapes go but it may be cost effective if the alternative is a bed
extension.

John


Re: Taper - I think I have a problem?!

wrlabs
 

[ ... ]
vikki;
you mentioned that the part you were turning was wood. on a
typical length of wood, because of the growth rings, the density of
the wood fibers will be different. this could result in a somewhat
eliptical circumference. if by chance you took your two measurments,
90 degrees apart from each other, that could explain what has occured.
it's also possible that, depending on species, the grain, thus
density, could ghange along even a short piece of wood. just a couple
of outside the box thoughts that might explain what's gone wrong.
Something I hadn't even though of, but now that you mention it, it
makes much sense.

I wonder if a follower rest would help with that? Probably not as the
elements involved are probably spring rather than flex, right?

Thanks much for adding to my mental toolbox of problem solving tools!

Take care, Vikki (Who has SO much to learn, but having fun getting
there :-)!).


Re: Taper - I think I have a problem?!

 

Here's a pretty good article on making the TS work properly.

<
ilstock/IndicatingBase/index.html>

Roy

--- In 7x12minilathe@..., "wrlabs" <wrlabs@...> wrote:

Hi folks,

Update...

I hath created a monster, I think :).

After loosening the socket head screw under the tailstock I
discover the
top of the tailstock flops in the X and Y axis. Raised section on
the
base and the slot in the tailstock itself are mismatched by (guess)
at
least 1/8", lotsa twist there.

Apparently that little slot head set screw on the back of the
tailstock
is for adjusting the Z (?rotational) orientation. If it was ever
tightened down, it worked loose over time.

I'm not sure what I am seeing here, but I get top and bottom of the
quill to read zero (top set as reference zero) but the front (toward
operator) and back are both around 13 (plus to front, minus to
rear),
depending on the tap of the moment.

I was using the dead center for this and I thought that it was
elliptical (flattened top to bottom). So, just to see what
happened, I
rotated the dead center 90 degrees expecting the top / bottom to
increase and the front / rear to decrease. Values did not
change ?!?

Tried this using the inside and outside of the quill and get the
same
kind of results.

I'm perplexed!

Putting this away for today, tired of cranking on that lock nut :-).

One another note. I was thinking it might be nice to have a place
were
folks could chat live, I put together a channel on
chat.freenode.net:
#vmmst

Standing for: Virtual Micro and Mini-Machine Shop Tavern :-).

Any IRC client will get you there set up for the network
(chat.freenode.net) and the channel (#vmmst).

IRC has gotten a bad rep for obnoxious jerks, but the exception to
this
I have found is freenode, my personal channel is there and I have
yet
(in years now) to have any problem with jerks.

Only rule I have for the channel is that folks treat it like my (or
your) living room and act accordingly. I do not and will not
tolerate
rude / obnoxious people. Enough said.

It's there if folks want a place to chat live, I'm there when I am
up
although I may be doing other things and not notice right away.

Thought it might be a nice resource.

It;s been an exciting day!

Take care, Vikki.


Re: Taper - I think I have a problem?!

wrlabs
 

--- In 7x12minilathe@..., "steam4ian" <fosterscons@...>
wrote:

G'day Vikki et al.
Vikki by now you must be totally confused.
A bit less than yesterday, I think :-)!

There you have generated
much useful discussion.
Some very good material has come out of this from many people and it has
certainly helped me a LOT!

I forgot to answer one of your questions,
that relating to the shim between the centres. It has been answered
by others, the shim can be a razor blade even a thin steel rule,
something the points on the centres can't penetrate.
OK, understand now, thanks! I'd seen that idea suggested for aligning
tools to spindle center but had (somehow?) forgotten about it since I
made my little tool height gauge. It obviously has other applications
too, thanks, that one goes in my mental toolbox :)!

Out of all this two things come to light. Firstly you need to check
your tailstock centering every time you want to turn a long parallel
piece. This is good practice with any lathe even more so with old
lathes. Secondly your design should acknowledge that some taper is
possible. For example, I recently turned a shaft which was to have a
bearing near each end. As I turned and miked the shaft I discovered I
was turning a taper. To overcome this I turned the midddle section of
the shaft below the bearing diameter and then separately turned each
bearing section to the nominated diameter. I guess this good practice
anyway.
Makes sense once I thought about it, something to remember (so much of
that going on here) hopefully I'll be able to retain all this wisdom
that has been so graciously given!

There is an old saying "A poor workman blames his tools". Behind this
is the fact that a good workman keeps his tools in good service but
also knows and allows for their shortcomings.
The other old saying, "measure twice and cut once". It applies to
lathes.
Err, but..., but.., but I have cut it off THREE times already and it is
still to damn short ;-)!

Slowly I am learning my tools and once one knows the rules then one know
which can be broken. I strongly suspect the learning will never end,
which suits me just fine :-). This is all just so fun and even more so
when one starts really understanding things.

BTW. You can check you headstock alignment by taking off the chuck
running your dial indicator across the face of the spindle with the
DI mounted on the cross slide. I am yet to be convinced that
headstock alignment is a problem unless the lathe has been mistreated
in transport or similar accidental damage.
I'll save messing with the headstock for later, this whole tailstock
thing has been enough for just the moment :-). Other than the taper
turning issue, the rest of it ?seems? to be very good and better than
some folks get. Perhaps wishing hard for some color other than yellow
for the unit had some other results like getting the gods at Seig and
the shipping folks to grace me with a special smile? LOL.

You can't turn longer than
3 times the job diameter so a small angular misalignment is not going
to induce much taper. Anyway the spindle axis and the cross slide
axis are not meant to be precisely perpendicular. For instance
turning across a face should cause a slight concavitiy, only a few
thou, but the concavity must be there. If not, a faced surface will
not sit flat on a truly flat surface.
Now that is a perplexing though to consider for a bit.

Anyhow Vikki, the host of responses indicates your bower is working!
:-) must be :-).

Planning on looking at sinking at least one more screw in the back of
the tailstock today - need to look at it as placement with the ramped
way on the base is probably an important issue to consider. An
exciting mill project :-)!

I did order the tailstock cam lock kit last night, had quite enough of
turning that hold down nut rather constantly already :-).

Thanks very much for your help and patience with my denseness :-)!

Take care, Vikki (off to the shop!).


Re: Taper - I think I have a problem?!

 

--- In 7x12minilathe@..., "wrlabs" <wrlabs@...> wrote:

Thanks to all that responded to this query.

OK, I am *totally* intimidated after going through some of the
websites
suggested :-(.

It is going to take a LOT more experience and especially more
understanding than I have before I start tearing down the lathe to
that
degree.

Of interest, I dug out that bolster bar I made out of the 1"
stainless
rod and measured that at each end (3") and it is only off by 0.001.
Chucked on one end, center drilled and supported by the live center
in
the tailstock.

Wonder if my problem is flex in the workpiece, as in I am hogging
it?
It would see that would make it off in the middle were it is
unsupported
though.

Yep, I am totally confused about what is going on here.

The item that was off the 0.015 was wood and I am now wondering if
the
centers being slightly off from the center marks (assuming they were
perfect) would cause that much difference? I would think that
turning
that down would result in it being symmetrical / consistent from
end to
end once it was turned down far enough?

Starting to think I really need a mentor or at least a decent course
about all this.

Thanks & take care, Vikki (The Massively Confuzed).
vikki;
you mentioned that the part you were turning was wood. on a
typical length of wood, because of the growth rings, the density of
the wood fibers will be different. this could result in a somewhat
eliptical circumference. if by chance you took your two measurments,
90 degrees apart from each other, that could explain what has occured.
it's also possible that, depending on species, the grain, thus
density, could ghange along even a short piece of wood. just a couple
of outside the box thoughts that might explain what's gone wrong.


Re: Threading and using the Dial

 

The most common methods use something that expands into the HS bore,
attached to the actual handcrank. One style uses a diagonally cut
piece that expands into the HS bore when it's tightened; exactly like
a bicycle handlebar adjuster. The other style uses a double-
expanding concrete anchor to grip the bore. You'll want about a 6"
lever arm with some flavor of knob. If you can get one, an old valve
handwheel works nicely, as does a defunct ball joint in a piece of
flat stock.



Roy

--- In 7x12minilathe@..., <gregorstransky@...> wrote:

Does anybody know a procudure how to make a handcrank? A while ago
I ran
across a procedure on one of the lathe/minilathe/machining
websites. But I
do not remember any more which website that was.
Thank you.
Gregor Stransky, San Antonio, Texas

----- Original Message -----
From: "roylowenthal" <roylowenthal@...>
To: <7x12minilathe@...>
Sent: Sunday, March 25, 2007 9:15 PM
Subject: [7x12minilathe] Re: Threading and using the Dial


The handiest threading accessory you can make is a handcrank!
Particularly on short, shouldered pieces turning the lathe by hand
gives more torque & much better control.


Re: Harbor freight 8x12 lathe (cheap digital calipers)

 

Hi David,

Thanks for that link. That saves me having to reverse engineer the
data format off the scope. A source of connectors would be nice.
Maybe I need to buy spare parts from a DRO maker.

Interestingly, I have calipers with two different connector
geometries. Both have the 4 gold-flashed PCB fingers but the
surrounding plastic differs. One is as shown at your link. The other
is more enclosed and clearly needs a differently housed plug. That's
what I love about standards - there's always such variety to choose
from!

John




--- In 7x12minilathe@..., figNoggle <david@...> wrote:



hi john-

<>

it was nice of the seller to provide extra batteries. going into a
local
drug store to buy replacements is very pricey.

hope this helps!
david



MetalWorkingFAQ.NET - Over 50 content sites!
<>
CNC, Plans/Kits, 8x12 Lathe, Mini-Mill, How-Tos
<>
Sieg X3/Super X3 Mill Information, HF/Enco Coupons
<>

On Mon, 26 Mar 2007, born4something wrote:

Hi,

Firstly, I should report back on the original topic. I followed
up
800watt on eBay and ordered several calipers from him. Yes, he
will
ship international on request. As people here said, his
communication is pretty terse and speed is not his forte.

The parcel took 18 days to get to me in Australia. But arrive it
did
and the calipers are fine. All 3 managed to turn themselves on in
transit as their hard cases allow enough movement to touch the
buttons on the protective foam - a nick with the penknife will
fix
that. They arrived with displays flashing indicating low
batteries.
However, each was packed with a spare battery and he threw in a
bonus strip of 5 extra batteries.


Now, who knows how to interface to the data port on these things?
They seem to take some sort of miniature 4-pin plug. What are
they
called - anyone got a part number? Anyone know the pinout and
data
format?

John



--- In 7x12minilathe@..., "born4something" <ajs@>
wrote:

Thanks,

Some of 800WATT's listings look pretty good - except he lists
as
US
only. :-(

Maybe I'll politely ask.

John


--- In 7x12minilathe@..., Druid Noibn
<druid_noibn@>
wrote:

Hi John,

Just two-more-cents-worth...

One might take a quick look on some of the eBay offerings.
For
example, a vendor "800WATT" sells the calipers item at good
prices -
watch the s/h charges however. Also, this vendor has a low
score
due to his poor communications style and often a bit long on
delivery time. I've purchased several items from him and all
worked
out well. I've also purchased a larger caliper from Australia
and
it arrived faster than the items from the US vendors.

Take care,
DBN


born4something <ajs@> wrote:


Hi,

I see lots of interest in cheap digital calipers -
presumeably
for
DRO
mods. Not sure if this helps but there are some at
ID=TD2081&CATID=&keywords=TD208&#92;
1&SPECIAL=&form=KEYWORD&ProdCodeOnly=&Keyword1=&Keyword2=&pageNumber=
&pr&#92;
iceMin=&priceMax=&SUBCATID=
<
ID=TD2081&CATID=&keywords=TD20&#92;
81&SPECIAL=&form=KEYWORD&ProdCodeOnly=&Keyword1=&Keyword2=&pageNumber
=&p&#92;
riceMin=&priceMax=&SUBCATID=> that may be of interest.

Ignore the listed price. I can buy these at Qty 1+ $12.77
Qty 5+
$11.77
Qty 10+ $10.77 (10% GST not inlcluded). The prices are in
Aussie
dollars
which sit around the $US0.75 mark. I'd probably wear about
$AU12
in
freight to get a delivery to my door.

I haven't physically seen one of these so the catalogue
entry is
all I
have. Perhaps a 1-off retail purchase should come first. If
someone
wants to buy some I'm happy to act as middle man. If a few
people
were
closely located a bulk buy may be attractive. Contact me off
list
if
you'd like to explore details.

John
(not associated in any way with the supplier, other than as a
trade
customer).

--- In 7x12minilathe@..., "mrslushy" <MrFrost@>
wrote:

--- In 7x12minilathe@..., "rancerupp" rupps@
wrote:

Chris,

You're not the only one that missed it. However I am
about 2
weeks
away
from ordering. I missed the $16 dig. caliper too.

Rance (sittin & watching the prices)

LMS currently has 6" digital caliper for 14.95.....check it
out.
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]






---------------------------------
No need to miss a message. Get email on-the-go
with Yahoo! Mail for Mobile. Get started.

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]