¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

Date

Re: basic lathe tooling queston

dc7drvr
 

It is not a problem to turn down barrel blanks. Some of the ones I
purchase are a couple of inches in diameter for a .357 hole. They
are oversize so the builder has the option of a bull barrel or
turning it down to normal sizes to match the guns barrel shape.

--- In 7x12minilathe@..., "Ian Foster" <fosterscons@...>
wrote:

G'day Harley.
I suggest you look up minilathe.com and the article on tools and
tool
grinding. This wil give you an insight into tool shapes, things
like
rakes and clearance angles. Armed with this knowledge you can fit
each
tool in your tool post and see what it provides for rake, clearance
and
cutting angle, then you will know what they do and how to use them.
I am not into weaponry but I would hesitate to machine material off
a
barrel. It most likely been forged and the outer surface will be
tough
to cut into. Your machining it will release stresses which may warp
it.
My Father was into competition target shooting and used to spend
lots
of time making sure the casing etc didn't foul the barrel as it
flexed
whilst firing. If I recall "grouping" of shots was most important.

One good turn deserves another.
Regards,
Ian


Re: First prototype of the laser edge/center finder done!

 

Vikki,

Rather than trying to drill a pin hole in a thicker piece, glue some
al. foil on BOTH sides of a thick washer. Mount a straight pin in
your drill press (or mill) and bring it down on the washer/al. foil
to poke a tiny hole through both layers of foil. This may give you
the same effect as a thicker waveguide.

Rance

--- In 7x12minilathe@..., Victoria Welch wrote:
On Saturday 14 April 2007, born4something wrote:
--- In 7x12minilathe@..., Victoria Welch <wrlabs@>

wrote:
...I doubt you'll drill a hole fine enough that
you need to design it as such.
:-) I was wondering just how to drill something out to ~650nM :-).
I've
got some *tiny* PCB drils but I don't think those are even in the
running :-).


Re: Database of past messages

Tony Smith
 

What a lot of hoo-ha about nothing, as the saying goes. 99.99% of the
message on these boards really aren't worth saving, including this entire
thread.

Having a decent search interface, or an index, or perhaps a list of 'best
of' threads would be nice. However, if you were going to do that, you might
as well do what other have done, and call it a book.

As far as who owns copyright, you do for your messages. By posting you
grant Yahoo the right to publish them (with no royalties) or do whatever
they like until you or they delete them. Yahoo doesn't really care (much)
about a 3rd party setting up a database, so long as they don't pretend to be
Yahoo, claim affiliation etc. The copyright & TOS (no, not Star Trek) pages
are linked off the main groups page.

If a poster has a problem with the 3rd party database, then it's between
them. Personally, if you feel that your messages are so valuable that you'd
be willing to fire off C&D letters or start lawsuits, perhaps you should
stop posting. 'rroll99' has exactly 3 messages in my inbox, the one
complaining about copyright, one asking for a book suggestion, and one
saying thanks re the book. Not worth getting excited about. Perhaps I can
sue all the other members of this group for having my copyrighted messages
on their computer systems. You can all sue me in return.

Besides, the whole point is spreading knowledge, and anything on this lists
would be fairly well known anyway. I doubt anything new & earthshattering
would appear on a message board that is mainly "I'm a newbie, how do I..."
posts. There a few websites that have cherrypicked lists for useful
messages, see for a example. It just
mangles the emails a bit.

Look at all the Usenet stuff, it eventually all ended up on Google. Useful?
Maybe.

Go write a book instead. Taking from many is called research, isn't it?
Plus you'll get a pat on the back, and not (as many) accusations of
copyright theft.

Tony

-----Original Message-----
From: 7x12minilathe@...
[mailto:7x12minilathe@...] On Behalf Of Druid Noibn
Sent: Monday, 16 April 2007 12:39 AM
To: 7x12minilathe@...
Subject: RE: [7x12minilathe] Re: Database of past messages

Hi Patrice L.,

Good points and well-taken. I am pleased to hear that you
removed the "copyright" from your site - however, as with the
best of intentions, this generates another problem and a
violation of the copyright law - your previous posting of
"copyright" was a also a violation, called theft.

The very issuance of the instrument is a copyright; however
the courts will not hear a case unless it is registered. By
not citing the copyright holder or the original author(s) you
are placing in public domain work in which you might not have
the authority to do so.

Next, has Yahoo released any and all copyrights to the
moderators and/or the original authors save for the logo and
possibly the "look and feel?"

Alternate view - The authors, by posting have gifted their
work as "public domain" in which case the public at-large
have full use of it. However, it does not grant the copyright.

As soon as any commercial benefit is made, the situation is
complicated. Commercial use is sometimes a fine hair to
split under the "Fair Use" principle. Most often restricted
to educational institutions - If one were to copy a document
for a class, a reasonable copying fee is permitted. A charge
greater than this is deemed commercial and would be seen as
unfair and potentially theft.

So while creating a compendium of postings is one of good
intentions, it does have ramifications due to the
ne're-do-wells who benefited from the work of others.

If you elect to otherwise post materials presented by
others, 1) permission is required and 2) full citation to the
copyright owner (saving this, the original author) must be
stated. Next disclosing information from a "members-only"
group (one needs to be a member to post) is not a good idea.

Your good intentions are appreciated, but your decision not
to proceed is likely the best.

Take care,
DBN


Patrice L <strempe4@...> wrote: Let me
address what I can.

1) I will add a reference to the Yahoo group. Not sure why I
did not do it but I see how that may be a good idea.
2) I removed the copyright at the bottom of these pages (a
couple of days ago actually). I had it on all my website.
Never thought to copyrights those for myself.
3) I've removed much of the identification as well as emails
for fear of revealing too much personal information.
4) I've added the adds recently to see if this was something
that could generate revenue to help with the cost of website
and to eventually upgrade so that I could add pictures on there.

Anyway, I am telling you that I wanted to do this to give
back, having received lots of help myself. But you don't know
me and I have no way to prove it to you or others.

I never had anything but good words from the Southbend group
and thought it would be a good idea. Guess not. SO don't
worry, I won't make it.

Patrice

-----Original Message-----
From: 7x12minilathe@...
[mailto:7x12minilathe@...]
On Behalf Of rroll99
Sent: Saturday, April 14, 2007 6:27 PM
To: 7x12minilathe@...
Subject: [7x12minilathe] Re: Database of past messages

I'm sorry, but I have to object.

What EXACTLY are you seeking permission to do?

I don't know what copyrights we give up to Yahoo Groups when
we post here, but I wish to retain any rights that I still
have and I don't want anything that I write on your web site.

I wouldn't care as much if you clearly identified on your web
site that the source of your content is the South Bend Lathe
Group, but you haven't done that. There isn't even a link to
the group. You've also stripped almost all information that
could identify the authors of the messages. And you've
prominently displayed your own copyright notices, which imply
that you own the copyrights to stuff that you don't have the
right to copyright.

Finally, you're displaying ads on your site, which means
you've at least considered trying to make money from other
people's writing.

Your web site also "cluttered up" a Google search that I did
the other day with multiple hits that were basically useless.
The answer that I was looking for might have been somewhere
on your site but it would have been difficult to find because
your "database" is more about quantity than quality. Quite
frankly, it's not very much of an improvement over the
group's built-in search function.

If you're wondering why this is an issue with me, it's
because I spent twelve years operating a web site/BBS as a
free public service to promote general aviation, and that
experience was ruined by those who felt that they could take
my work without my permission or without giving me credit as
the source.

I think that if you want to put what you learn here on your
web site, then you need to write it in your own words.

--- In 7x12minilathe@..., "borenson444"
<strempe4@...> wrote:

Hi

I am a Southbend lathe owner that created a database of
past messages
for the Southbend groups a while ago. Since the resource
seems to be
useful, I thought I'd maybe try and add one or two new
ones. Metalwork
being my hobby, this group seems interesting.

So I am asking permission from the administrator as well as from
members.

I hope that this message will be moderated to see if it's ok as I
would not want to post something I am not supposed to.

Thanks for your time.

Patrice


Re: Database of past messages

Druid Noibn
 

Hi Patrice L.,

Good points and well-taken. I am pleased to hear that you removed the "copyright" from your site - however, as with the best of intentions, this generates another problem and a violation of the copyright law - your previous posting of "copyright" was a also a violation, called theft.

The very issuance of the instrument is a copyright; however the courts will not hear a case unless it is registered. By not citing the copyright holder or the original author(s) you are placing in public domain work in which you might not have the authority to do so.

Next, has Yahoo released any and all copyrights to the moderators and/or the original authors save for the logo and possibly the "look and feel?"

Alternate view - The authors, by posting have gifted their work as "public domain" in which case the public at-large have full use of it. However, it does not grant the copyright.

As soon as any commercial benefit is made, the situation is complicated. Commercial use is sometimes a fine hair to split under the ¡°Fair Use¡± principle. Most often restricted to educational institutions - If one were to copy a document for a class, a reasonable copying fee is permitted. A charge greater than this is deemed commercial and would be seen as unfair and potentially theft.

So while creating a compendium of postings is one of good intentions, it does have ramifications due to the ne¡¯re-do-wells who benefited from the work of others.

If you elect to otherwise post materials presented by others, 1) permission is required and 2) full citation to the copyright owner (saving this, the original author) must be stated. Next disclosing information from a ¡°members-only¡± group (one needs to be a member to post) is not a good idea.

Your good intentions are appreciated, but your decision not to proceed is likely the best.

Take care,
DBN


Patrice L <strempe4@...> wrote: Let me address what I can.

1) I will add a reference to the Yahoo group. Not sure why I did not do it
but I see how that may be a good idea.
2) I removed the copyright at the bottom of these pages (a couple of days
ago actually). I had it on all my website. Never thought to copyrights those
for myself.
3) I've removed much of the identification as well as emails for fear of
revealing too much personal information.
4) I've added the adds recently to see if this was something that could
generate revenue to help with the cost of website and to eventually upgrade
so that I could add pictures on there.

Anyway, I am telling you that I wanted to do this to give back, having
received lots of help myself. But you don't know me and I have no way to
prove it to you or others.

I never had anything but good words from the Southbend group and thought it
would be a good idea. Guess not. SO don't worry, I won't make it.

Patrice

-----Original Message-----
From: 7x12minilathe@... [mailto:7x12minilathe@...]
On Behalf Of rroll99
Sent: Saturday, April 14, 2007 6:27 PM
To: 7x12minilathe@...
Subject: [7x12minilathe] Re: Database of past messages

I'm sorry, but I have to object.

What EXACTLY are you seeking permission to do?

I don't know what copyrights we give up to Yahoo Groups when we post
here, but I wish to retain any rights that I still have and I don't
want anything that I write on your web site.

I wouldn't care as much if you clearly identified on your web site
that the source of your content is the South Bend Lathe Group, but you
haven't done that. There isn't even a link to the group. You've also
stripped almost all information that could identify the authors of the
messages. And you've prominently displayed your own copyright
notices, which imply that you own the copyrights to stuff that you
don't have the right to copyright.

Finally, you're displaying ads on your site, which means you've at
least considered trying to make money from other people's writing.

Your web site also "cluttered up" a Google search that I did the other
day with multiple hits that were basically useless. The answer that I
was looking for might have been somewhere on your site but it would
have been difficult to find because your "database" is more about
quantity than quality. Quite frankly, it's not very much of an
improvement over the group's built-in search function.

If you're wondering why this is an issue with me, it's because I spent
twelve years operating a web site/BBS as a free public service to
promote general aviation, and that experience was ruined by those who
felt that they could take my work without my permission or without
giving me credit as the source.

I think that if you want to put what you learn here on your web site,
then you need to write it in your own words.

--- In 7x12minilathe@..., "borenson444" <strempe4@...> wrote:

Hi

I am a Southbend lathe owner that created a database of past messages
for the Southbend groups a while ago. Since the resource seems to be
useful, I thought I'd maybe try and add one or two new ones. Metalwork
being my hobby, this group seems interesting.

So I am asking permission from the administrator as well as from
members.

I hope that this message will be moderated to see if it's ok as I
would not want to post something I am not supposed to.

Thanks for your time.

Patrice
Be sure to check out for small mills and
lathes.
Yahoo! Groups Links

__________ NOD32 2188 (20070414) Information __________

This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system.







---------------------------------
Ahhh...imagining that irresistible "new car" smell?
Check outnew cars at Yahoo! Autos.

---------------------------------
Ahhh...imagining that irresistible "new car" smell?
Check outnew cars at Yahoo! Autos.


Re: Database of past messages

 

G'day Patrice.

Thanks for getting on top of the problems. I have no objection to
your copyrighting the data base but not the content, that belongs to
the writers. You need to protect yourself and the writers from
unscrupulous opportunists.
It is up to this groups MODERATORS to comment. They are the persons
who hold this group together so that discussions on machining are not
diluted with pseudo polital debate? or adverts for ladies of doubtful
vitue or products not needed by those in a healthy sexual
relationship. The moderation means that the pearls of wisdom are
reasonably accessible. Please get the moderators response.

One good turn deserves another.
Regards,
Ian


--- In 7x12minilathe@..., Patrice L <strempe4@...> wrote:

Let me address what I can.

1) I will add a reference to the Yahoo group. Not sure why I did
not do it
but I see how that may be a good idea.
2) I removed the copyright at the bottom of these pages (a couple
of days
ago actually). I had it on all my website. Never thought to
copyrights those
for myself.
3) I've removed much of the identification as well as emails for
fear of
revealing too much personal information.
4) I've added the adds recently to see if this was something that
could
generate revenue to help with the cost of website and to eventually
upgrade
so that I could add pictures on there.

Anyway, I am telling you that I wanted to do this to give back,
having
received lots of help myself. But you don't know me and I have no
way to
prove it to you or others.

I never had anything but good words from the Southbend group and
thought it
would be a good idea. Guess not. SO don't worry, I won't make it.

Patrice


Re: Database of past messages

 

Let me address what I can.

1) I will add a reference to the Yahoo group. Not sure why I did not do it
but I see how that may be a good idea.
2) I removed the copyright at the bottom of these pages (a couple of days
ago actually). I had it on all my website. Never thought to copyrights those
for myself.
3) I've removed much of the identification as well as emails for fear of
revealing too much personal information.
4) I've added the adds recently to see if this was something that could
generate revenue to help with the cost of website and to eventually upgrade
so that I could add pictures on there.

Anyway, I am telling you that I wanted to do this to give back, having
received lots of help myself. But you don't know me and I have no way to
prove it to you or others.

I never had anything but good words from the Southbend group and thought it
would be a good idea. Guess not. SO don't worry, I won't make it.

Patrice

-----Original Message-----
From: 7x12minilathe@... [mailto:7x12minilathe@...]
On Behalf Of rroll99
Sent: Saturday, April 14, 2007 6:27 PM
To: 7x12minilathe@...
Subject: [7x12minilathe] Re: Database of past messages

I'm sorry, but I have to object.

What EXACTLY are you seeking permission to do?

I don't know what copyrights we give up to Yahoo Groups when we post
here, but I wish to retain any rights that I still have and I don't
want anything that I write on your web site.

I wouldn't care as much if you clearly identified on your web site
that the source of your content is the South Bend Lathe Group, but you
haven't done that. There isn't even a link to the group. You've also
stripped almost all information that could identify the authors of the
messages. And you've prominently displayed your own copyright
notices, which imply that you own the copyrights to stuff that you
don't have the right to copyright.

Finally, you're displaying ads on your site, which means you've at
least considered trying to make money from other people's writing.

Your web site also "cluttered up" a Google search that I did the other
day with multiple hits that were basically useless. The answer that I
was looking for might have been somewhere on your site but it would
have been difficult to find because your "database" is more about
quantity than quality. Quite frankly, it's not very much of an
improvement over the group's built-in search function.

If you're wondering why this is an issue with me, it's because I spent
twelve years operating a web site/BBS as a free public service to
promote general aviation, and that experience was ruined by those who
felt that they could take my work without my permission or without
giving me credit as the source.

I think that if you want to put what you learn here on your web site,
then you need to write it in your own words.


--- In 7x12minilathe@..., "borenson444" <strempe4@...> wrote:

Hi

I am a Southbend lathe owner that created a database of past messages
for the Southbend groups a while ago. Since the resource seems to be
useful, I thought I'd maybe try and add one or two new ones. Metalwork
being my hobby, this group seems interesting.

So I am asking permission from the administrator as well as from
members.

I hope that this message will be moderated to see if it's ok as I
would not want to post something I am not supposed to.

Thanks for your time.

Patrice



Be sure to check out for small mills and
lathes.
Yahoo! Groups Links




__________ NOD32 2188 (20070414) Information __________

This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system.


cnc 8x12/14 lathe up and running!

 

hi all-

the cnc 8x12/14 prototype's finished and working under power. we still need to familiarlize ourselves with the control software, but so far so good. we started turning some acetal/delrin rod as a start. we're now off to getting the spindle controlled via software as well :)

<>
or
<>

thanks for listening!
david

--

Free photo storage for hobbyists - share pics! <>
MetalWorkingFAQ.NET - Over 50 content sites! <>
CNC, Plans/Kits, 8x12 Lathe, Mini-Mill, How-Tos <>
Sieg X3/Super X3 Mill Information, HF/Enco Coupons <>


Re: basic lathe tooling queston

 

G'day Harley.
I suggest you look up minilathe.com and the article on tools and tool
grinding. This wil give you an insight into tool shapes, things like
rakes and clearance angles. Armed with this knowledge you can fit each
tool in your tool post and see what it provides for rake, clearance and
cutting angle, then you will know what they do and how to use them.
I am not into weaponry but I would hesitate to machine material off a
barrel. It most likely been forged and the outer surface will be tough
to cut into. Your machining it will release stresses which may warp it.
My Father was into competition target shooting and used to spend lots
of time making sure the casing etc didn't foul the barrel as it flexed
whilst firing. If I recall "grouping" of shots was most important.

One good turn deserves another.
Regards,
Ian


Re: First prototype of the laser edge/center finder done!

tbarker_xxx
 

There seems to be some engineering/physicists following this thread
so maybe somebody can answer a question I've had about laser edge
locators. I understand that they are just producing a small spot and
depending upon the user's eye to do the alignment, but that does not
seem to take full advantage of the characteristics of a laser. Why
are these units not taking the reflected image and splitting it so
that they can form an interference pattern from the two sides of the
beam? Since the travel distance as the beam moves onto an edge would
be different the split beam should show very noticable interference
(assuming of course that the difference in travel distance is not a
multiple of the wavelenght and that seems unlikely).

To me it seems like that approach would lead to a highly repeatable
precision-edge- detection. I've thought a bit about what optics
might be required and it does not seem like it would be too hard to
mass produce, although it is probable something that would a bit hard
to prototype in a home shop.

--- In 7x12minilathe@..., Victoria Welch <wrlabs@...>
wrote:

On Saturday 14 April 2007, born4something wrote:
--- In 7x12minilathe@..., Victoria Welch <wrlabs@>

wrote:
Please don't laugh too hard :).
Not laughing Vikki. Handles are seriously useful from an OH&S
viewpoint as well as comfort. But make sure they fit solidly. Just
imagine filing energetically and dislodging a handle such that the
tang is driven up inside your wrist on the next power stroke.
Similarly when using in the lathe and something grabs
unexpectedly.
With that in mind, I need a few more handles and to refit some
more
securely!
I drilled out the shank in two steps, deep for the thin end and
another
at the top for the big end near the file itself. I don't know if
that
helped or that cheap wood is just so springy that it comes down on
the
shank tightly?!? Short of pounding it off with a hammer of some
sort,
I think it is there to stay.

Just put it over the file shank and popped it down on the
workbench.
Maybe there is a place for crap wood ;-)?

Take care, Vikki (pleased not be be laughed at :-).
--
Victoria Welch, WV9K/7
If you think education is expensive, try ignorance" --Andy McIntyre
and
Derek Bok


basic lathe tooling queston

harleyknall
 

I am new, I beleive bit C is fo threading, what are the other bits
for?
I with to turn down the outside diameter of some rifle barrels.
I assume one and is for cutting left to right, and the other is for
right to left.
Which is which? And what is the diferance between the steep and
shallow anle bits?

Please use the labeled piture to explain in detail.
THANKS!!!


action=view&current=lathebits.jpg


Re: Database of past messages

 

G'day Patrice & rroll99.
Whilst I embrace Patrice's idea rroll99's post brings to the surface
some latent concerns I felt when looking atr the data base.
To get something off my chest. Patrice if you are looking to profit
from the collective "wisdom" of these groups then I direct you
to "depart, urinating as you go".
That said; if Patrice is genuinely trying to provide the lathe
community a service then his copyrighting of the data base is a
necessary protection from those with less scruples putting the
efforts on a CD and hawking them around eBay; it is happening.
The source of material must be acknowledged, it is not too much for a
community "Cook Book". The material must remain where it began, free
in the PUBLIC DOMAIN.

Regarding acknowledgement, some of our handles are a bit impersonal.
Who are you "rroll99"?

One good turn deserves another.
Regards,
Ian


--- In 7x12minilathe@..., "rroll99" <rroll99@...> wrote:

I don't know what copyrights we give up to Yahoo Groups when we post
here, but I wish to retain any rights that I still have and I don't
want anything that I write on your web site.

I wouldn't care as much if you clearly identified on your web site
that the source of your content is the South Bend Lathe Group, but
you
haven't done that. There isn't even a link to the group. You've
also
stripped almost all information that could identify the authors of
the
messages. And you've prominently displayed your own copyright
notices, which imply that you own the copyrights to stuff that you
don't have the right to copyright.


Re: First prototype of the laser edge/center finder done!

Malcolm Parker-Lisberg
 

Synthetic sapphire balls are used for precision ball bearings. For one example see <>
They are not expensive only $1 to $2 each.

Victoria Welch <wrlabs@...> wrote: On Saturday 14 April 2007, Malcolm Parker-Lisberg wrote:
> The saphire ball bearing makes an excellent lens for a diode laser.

I suppose so, but outside of my roomie and her bead mill I have no idea
were to even start looking for something like that.

Would probably also add considerable value to a $1 laser pointer
too :-)!

Thanks & take care, Vikki.
--
Victoria Welch, WV9K/7
"Experience should teach us to be most on our guard to protect liberty
when the government's purposes are beneficient . . . the greatest
dangers to liberty lurk in insidious encroachment by men of zeal, well
meaning but without understanding." -- Justice Louis Brandeis






---------------------------------
Ahhh...imagining that irresistible "new car" smell?
Check outnew cars at Yahoo! Autos.


Re: Database of past messages

 

I'm sorry, but I have to object.

What EXACTLY are you seeking permission to do?

I don't know what copyrights we give up to Yahoo Groups when we post
here, but I wish to retain any rights that I still have and I don't
want anything that I write on your web site.

I wouldn't care as much if you clearly identified on your web site
that the source of your content is the South Bend Lathe Group, but you
haven't done that. There isn't even a link to the group. You've also
stripped almost all information that could identify the authors of the
messages. And you've prominently displayed your own copyright
notices, which imply that you own the copyrights to stuff that you
don't have the right to copyright.

Finally, you're displaying ads on your site, which means you've at
least considered trying to make money from other people's writing.

Your web site also "cluttered up" a Google search that I did the other
day with multiple hits that were basically useless. The answer that I
was looking for might have been somewhere on your site but it would
have been difficult to find because your "database" is more about
quantity than quality. Quite frankly, it's not very much of an
improvement over the group's built-in search function.

If you're wondering why this is an issue with me, it's because I spent
twelve years operating a web site/BBS as a free public service to
promote general aviation, and that experience was ruined by those who
felt that they could take my work without my permission or without
giving me credit as the source.

I think that if you want to put what you learn here on your web site,
then you need to write it in your own words.


--- In 7x12minilathe@..., "borenson444" <strempe4@...> wrote:

Hi

I am a Southbend lathe owner that created a database of past messages
for the Southbend groups a while ago. Since the resource seems to be
useful, I thought I'd maybe try and add one or two new ones. Metalwork
being my hobby, this group seems interesting.

So I am asking permission from the administrator as well as from
members.

I hope that this message will be moderated to see if it's ok as I
would not want to post something I am not supposed to.

Thanks for your time.

Patrice


Re: First prototype of the laser edge/center finder done!

Victoria Welch
 

On Saturday 14 April 2007, Malcolm Parker-Lisberg wrote:
The saphire ball bearing makes an excellent lens for a diode laser.
I suppose so, but outside of my roomie and her bead mill I have no idea
were to even start looking for something like that.

Would probably also add considerable value to a $1 laser pointer
too :-)!

Thanks & take care, Vikki.
--
Victoria Welch, WV9K/7
"Experience should teach us to be most on our guard to protect liberty
when the government's purposes are beneficient . . . the greatest
dangers to liberty lurk in insidious encroachment by men of zeal, well
meaning but without understanding." -- Justice Louis Brandeis


Re: First prototype of the laser edge/center finder done!

Malcolm Parker-Lisberg
 

The saphire ball bearing makes an excellent lens for a diode laser.

Victoria Welch <wrlabs@...> wrote: On Saturday 14 April 2007, born4something wrote:
> --- In 7x12minilathe@..., Victoria Welch <wrlabs@...>
>
> wrote:
> > Just wondering if thinking of this as a waveguide (as in microwave
> > radio) might be appropriate?!? Hummm....
>
> Hi Vikki,
>
> It is a waveguide but I doubt you'll drill a hole fine enough that
> you need to design it as such. While ever your tolerances exceed a
> wavelength you won't be in the race!

:-) I was wondering just how to drill something out to ~650nM :-). I've
got some *tiny* PCB drils but I don't think those are even in the
running :-).

> Your comments about being able to achieve a very good pin spot at any
> given distance but circles elsewhere make me think your source is off
> axis and you are projecting cones of light. You can set the
> convergent apex of the cone but it's still a cone. I haven't been
> following all of this thread in detail but does that gel?

Yes Sir, it does.

For $1 each including batteries (some ~$4, some ~$7) they are all crappy
in terms of beam and every one is noticeably different in the spot it
produces. Just how good those little plastic collimating lenses are is
a whole different story. I'd bet that the laser LEDs that go into
those thing are not pick of the production run and the most that can be
said about them is that they do emit from someplace on the device and
at varying intensity as well.

Sorta like antenna work, So many variables :-).

Will be interesting to see what this one from Micro-Mark is like.

Take care, Vikki.
--
Victoria Welch, WV9K/7
"Certainly the game is rigged. Don't let that stop you; if you don't
bet, you can't win." --Lazarus Long






---------------------------------
Ahhh...imagining that irresistible "new car" smell?
Check outnew cars at Yahoo! Autos.


Re: First prototype of the laser edge/center finder done!

Victoria Welch
 

On Saturday 14 April 2007, born4something wrote:
--- In 7x12minilathe@..., Victoria Welch <wrlabs@...>

wrote:
Just wondering if thinking of this as a waveguide (as in microwave
radio) might be appropriate?!? Hummm....
Hi Vikki,

It is a waveguide but I doubt you'll drill a hole fine enough that
you need to design it as such. While ever your tolerances exceed a
wavelength you won't be in the race!
:-) I was wondering just how to drill something out to ~650nM :-). I've
got some *tiny* PCB drils but I don't think those are even in the
running :-).

Your comments about being able to achieve a very good pin spot at any
given distance but circles elsewhere make me think your source is off
axis and you are projecting cones of light. You can set the
convergent apex of the cone but it's still a cone. I haven't been
following all of this thread in detail but does that gel?
Yes Sir, it does.

For $1 each including batteries (some ~$4, some ~$7) they are all crappy
in terms of beam and every one is noticeably different in the spot it
produces. Just how good those little plastic collimating lenses are is
a whole different story. I'd bet that the laser LEDs that go into
those thing are not pick of the production run and the most that can be
said about them is that they do emit from someplace on the device and
at varying intensity as well.

Sorta like antenna work, So many variables :-).

Will be interesting to see what this one from Micro-Mark is like.

Take care, Vikki.
--
Victoria Welch, WV9K/7
"Certainly the game is rigged. Don't let that stop you; if you don't
bet, you can't win." --Lazarus Long


Re: First prototype of the laser edge/center finder done!

Victoria Welch
 

On Saturday 14 April 2007, born4something wrote:
--- In 7x12minilathe@..., Victoria Welch <wrlabs@...>

wrote:
Please don't laugh too hard :).
Not laughing Vikki. Handles are seriously useful from an OH&S
viewpoint as well as comfort. But make sure they fit solidly. Just
imagine filing energetically and dislodging a handle such that the
tang is driven up inside your wrist on the next power stroke.
Similarly when using in the lathe and something grabs unexpectedly.
With that in mind, I need a few more handles and to refit some more
securely!
I drilled out the shank in two steps, deep for the thin end and another
at the top for the big end near the file itself. I don't know if that
helped or that cheap wood is just so springy that it comes down on the
shank tightly?!? Short of pounding it off with a hammer of some sort,
I think it is there to stay.

Just put it over the file shank and popped it down on the workbench.
Maybe there is a place for crap wood ;-)?

Take care, Vikki (pleased not be be laughed at :-).
--
Victoria Welch, WV9K/7
If you think education is expensive, try ignorance" --Andy McIntyre and
Derek Bok


Re: First prototype of the laser edge/center finder done!

Victoria Welch
 

On Saturday 14 April 2007, born4something wrote:
--- In 7x12minilathe@..., Victoria Welch <wrlabs@...>

wrote:
Shipping isn't real bad, it is costing me almost $30 here :-).
Hi Vikki,

Are you being ripped off on freight? I just ordered one from Micro-
Mark and it came to $US30.88 (19.95+10.93 freight). I'm in Oz too so
when Ian said $40 total that would be Aussie dollars. If you're
paying the same as us I sure hope it's express delivery. M-M say 4 -
12 weeks for international. :-(
Dunno, apparently not $28.90 ($19.95+$8.95 shipping). They are in New
Jersey so WA state is not all that much closer than Oz ;-).

Never mind, you'll have posted all the neat extra tricks by the time
we get ours (and ours will have flat batteries by the time they
arrive, LOL). Thanks for the link - and the discount Ian spotted!
Hopefully it will be simple enough that there won't be any ;-).

Probably the one I am most interested in with this thing is setting the
lathe tools on center and using it to adjust the tailstock. The mill
stuff is just gravy :-).

Should be a lot of fun and if it works at all, a lot quicker.
Fortunately I just ordered a full set of MT2 collets so I won't have to
depend on the supplied drill chuck for the mill.

Should be fun under any conditions, plus it might give me ideas!

Take care, Vikki.
--
Victoria Welch, WV9K/7
"The best minds are not in government. If any were, business would hire
them away." - Ronald Reagan


Re: First prototype of the laser edge/center finder done!

Victoria Welch
 

On Saturday 14 April 2007, Ian Foster wrote:
G'day John & Vikki et al.

I hope Micro Mark have container load of these things; I think I've
started a rush.
If some one for MicroMark is reading this, I would like a commission!

One good turn deserves another (Commission?).
Hey! I found the link, I want my cut too </politician> :-). LOL!

Take care, Vikki.
--
Victoria Welch, WV9K/7
"Life has meaning only in the struggle. Triumph or defeat is in the
hands of the gods...so let us celebrate the struggle!" -- Swahili
Warrior Song


Re: First prototype of the laser edge/center finder done!

Victoria Welch
 

On Saturday 14 April 2007, Clint D wrote:
Vickie

Thank you, I had look thru their site and never found it till you
provided the info.
Clint
Glad to help!

I knew I had seen two different ones of these things, but I wasn't sure
where, I thought it was MM, but I spent some time rooting around
different sites and then at MM and am still not sure how I found
it :-). Glad I persisted though :-)!

Take care, Vikki.
--
Victoria Welch, WV9K/7
'Never argue with an idiot. They drag you down to their level then beat
you with experience.' --Cecil Bayona